Cilt 4 Sayı 1 (2016): BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT STUDIES: AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL
Makaleler

KÜLTÜR ETKİSİ BAĞLAMINDA GİRİŞİMCİLERİN KİŞİSEL ÖZELLİKLERİ HAKKINDA BİR TARTIŞMA

Yayınlanmış 2016-04-17

Anahtar Kelimeler

  • Girişimcilik,
  • Girişimci,
  • Kişisel Özellikler

Nasıl Atıf Yapılır

Mayatürk Akyol, E. (2016). KÜLTÜR ETKİSİ BAĞLAMINDA GİRİŞİMCİLERİN KİŞİSEL ÖZELLİKLERİ HAKKINDA BİR TARTIŞMA. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 4(1), 63–83. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v4i1.133

Özet

Küreselleşen dünyadaki ekonomik, sosyal, kültürel ve teknolojik değişimler; gelişim bakımından tüm ekonomilerde önemli bir yeri olan üretime ve girişimciliğe duyulan ihtiyacı artırmıştır. Söz konusu girişimleri gerçekleştirecek olan kişiler ise; girişimci özelliklere sahip olan bireylerdir. Zira girişimcilerin kişisel özelliklerinin belirlenmesinin, girişimci adaylarının belirlenmesine ve yönlendirilmesine katkı sağlayabileceği düşünülmektedir. Girişimci özelliklerinin tespiti ayrıca, eksiklerin saptanması ve giderilmesine de fayda sağlayabilecektir. Bu bağlamda söz konusu çalışmada, çeşitli kültürler açısından girişimcilere özgü farklı özelliklerin açıklanması ve değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmaktadır.   

İndirmeler

İndirme verileri henüz mevcut değil.

Referanslar

  1. Ahl, H. (2006). Why research on women entrepreneurs needs new directions.
  2. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(5), 595-621.
  3. Ahlstrom, D., Young, M. N., Chan, E. S., & Bruton, G. D. (2004). Facing constraints
  4. to growth? Overseas Chinese entrepreneurs and traditional business practices in East Asia. Asia Pasific Journal of Management, 21, 263-285.
  5. Baron, R. A. (2000). Counterfactual thinking and venture formation: The potential
  6. effects of thinking about "what might have been". Journal of Business Venturing, 15(1), 79-91.
  7. Baron, R. A., & Markman, G. D. (2003). Beyond social capital: The role of
  8. entrepreneurs' social competence in their financial success. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 41-60.
  9. Begley, T. M. (1995). Using founder status, age of firm, and company growth rate as
  10. the basis for distinguishing entrepreneurs from managers of smaller businesses. Journal of Business Venturing, 10, 249- 263.
  11. Beugelsdijk, S., & Noorderhaven, N. (2005). Personality characteristics of selfemployed; an empirical study. Small Business Economics, 24, 159-167.
  12. Brockhaus, R. H. (1980). Risk taking propensity of entrepreneurs. Academy of Management Journal, 23(3), 509-520.
  13. Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Obloj, K. (2008). Entrepreneurship in emerging economies: Where are we today and where should the research go in the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(1), 1-14.
  14. Busenitz, L. W., & Barney, J. B. (1997). Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: Biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(1), 9-30.
  15. Bygrave, W. D., & Hofer, C. W. (1991). Theorizing about entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16(2), 13-22.
  16. Chu, P. (2000). The characteristics of Chinese female entrepreneurs: Motivation and Personality. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 8(1), 67-84.
  17. Cooper, A. C., Woo, C. Y., & Dunkelberg, W. C. (1988). Entrepreneurs’ perceived chances for success. Journal of Business Venturing, 3, 97-108.
  18. Cunningham, J. B., & Lischeron, J. (1991). Defining entrepreneurship. Journal of Small Business Management, 29(1), 45-61.
  19. Duchesneau, D. A., & Gartner, W. B. (1990). A profile of new venture success and failure in an emerging industry. Journal of Business Venturing, 5(5), 297-312.
  20. Eckhardt, J. T., & Shane, S. A. (2003). Opportunities and entrepreneurship. Journal of Management, 29(3), 333-349.
  21. Gartner, W. B. (1985). A conceptual framework for describing the phenomenon of new venture creation. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 696-706.
  22. Gartner, W. B. (1989). “Who is an entrepreneur?” is the wrong question. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 13(4), 47-68.
  23. Gartner, W. B. (1990). What are we talking about when we talk about entrepreneurship?. Journal of Business Venturing, 5(1), 15-28.
  24. Gedeon, S. (2010). What is entrepreneurship?. Entrepreneurial Practice Review, 1(3),
  25. -35.
  26. The Global Entrepreneurship and Development Institute (GEDI). (2016). Retrieved
  27. from https://thegedi.org/global-entrepreneurship-and-development-index/
  28. George, G., & Zahra, S. A. (2002). Culture and its consequences for entrepreneurship.
  29. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26(4), 5-8.
  30. Gupta, V., & Fernandez, C. (2009). Cross-cultural similarities and differences in characteristics attributed to entrepreneurs: A three-nation study. Journal of Leadership &
  31. Organizational Studies, 15, 304-318.
  32. Hayton, J. C., George, G., & Zahra, S. A. (2002). National culture and entrepreneurship: A review of behavioral research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,
  33. (4), 33-52.
  34. Hisrich, R. D. (1988). Entrepreneurship: Past, present, and future. Journal of Small
  35. Business Management, 26(4), 1-4.
  36. Johnson, B. R. (1990). Toward a multidimensional model of entrepreneurship: The case of achievement motivation and the entrepreneur. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,
  37. , 39-54.
  38. Koh, H. C. (1996). Testing hypotheses of entrepreneurial characteristics: A study of Hong Kong MBA students. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 11(3), 12-25.
  39. Lachman, R. (1980). Toward measurement of entrepreneurial tendencies. Management
  40. International Review, 20(2), 108-116.
  41. Lafuente, A., & Salas, V. (1989). Types of entrepreneurs and firms: The case of new Spanish firms. Strategic Management Journal, 10, 17-30.
  42. Leibenstein, H. (1968). Entrepreneurship and development. The American Economic Review, 58(2), 72-83.
  43. Matlay, H. (2005). Researching entrepreneurship and education. Education + Training, 47(8-9), 665-677.
  44. Miner, J. B. (1990). Entrepreneurs, high growth entrepreneurs, and managers: Contrasting and overlapping motivational patterns. Journal of Business Venturing, 5(4), 221-234.
  45. Mueller, S. L., & Thomas, A. S. (2001). Culture and entrepreneurial potential: A nine country study of locus of control and innovativeness. Journal of Business Venturing, 16, 51-75.
  46. Naude, W., Szirmai, A., & Goedhuys, M. (2011). Innovation and entrepreneurship in developing countries. Policy Brief, 1, 1-7.
  47. Palmer, M. (1971). The application of psychological testing to entrepreneurial potential. California Management Review, 13(3), 32-38.
  48. Stewart, W. H., Watson, W. E., Carland, J. C., & Carland, J. W. (1999). A proclivity for entrepreneurship: A comparison of entrepreneurs, small business owners, and corporate
  49. managers. Journal of Business Venturing, 14(2), 189-214.
  50. Tamer, G. (2013). Women’s entrepreneurship in Turkey compared to the world. I. Genç Bilim Adamları Sempozyumu, November 28-29, 649-656.
  51. Thomas, A. S., & Mueller, S. L. (2000). A case for comparative entrepreneurship: Assessing the relevance of culture. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(2), 287-301.
  52. Turan, M., & Kara, A. (2007). An exploratory study of characteristics and attributes of Turkish entrepreneurs: A cross-country comparison to Irish entrepreneurs. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 5, 25-46.
  53. Venkataraman, S. (1997). The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research. In:
  54. Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence and growth (pp. 119-138), Vol. 3, JAI Press Inc.
  55. Webster, F. A. (1977). Entrepreneurs and ventures: An attempt to classification and clarification. The Academy of Management Review, 2(1), 54-61.
  56. West, G. P., Bamfort, C. E., & Marsden, J. W. (2008). Contrasting entrepreneurial economic development in emerging Latin American economies: Applications and extensions of resource-based theory. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32, 15-36.
  57. Yetim, N., & Yetim, U. (2006). The cultural orientations of entrepreneurs and employees’ job satisfaction: The Turkish Small and Medium Sized Enterprises (SMEs) case. Social Indicators Research, 77(2), 257-286.