Vol. 14 No. 3 (2026): Business & Management Studies: An International Journal
Articles

A methodological look at international student (IS) satisfaction from the perspective of international student office (ISO) staff: The balance between the hook and the fishing rod

PDF (Turkish)
  • Ahmet Turalı,
  • Gonca Akkartal,
  • Mehmet Saim Aşçı
Ahmet Turalı
Istanbul Medipol University Institute of Social Sciences, Istanbul, Türkiye
Bio
Gonca Akkartal
Assoc. Prof. Dr., Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Türkiye
Bio
Mehmet Saim Aşçı
Assoc. Prof. Dr., Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Türkiye
Bio

Published 2026-09-25

Keywords

  • Yükseköğretim, Uluslararası Öğrenci (IS), Uluslararası Öğrenci Ofisi (ISO), Uluslararası Öğrenci Hareketliliği
  • Higher Education, International Student, International Student Office (ISO), International Student Mobility

How to Cite

A methodological look at international student (IS) satisfaction from the perspective of international student office (ISO) staff: The balance between the hook and the fishing rod. (2026). Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 14(3), 1719-1748. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v14i3.2832

Copyright (c) 2026 Ahmet Turalı- Gonca Akkartal- Mehmet Saim Aşçı

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

A methodological look at international student (IS) satisfaction from the perspective of international student office (ISO) staff: The balance between the hook and the fishing rod. (2026). Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 14(3), 1719-1748. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v14i3.2832

Abstract

This study examines priorities affecting international student (IS) satisfaction, and related challenges, from the perspective of International Student Office (ISO) staff at Turkish foundation universities. It rests on a "hook and fishing rod" analogy: prestige attracts students, service quality retains them. Ten ISO staff completed an AHP questionnaire of four pairwise comparisons and were then interviewed; interviews were analyzed thematically in MAXQDA (inter-coder agreement: Cohen's Kappa κ=0.84). In pairwise comparisons, image/prestige was preferred over service professionalism (0.67 vs. 0.33); academic quality over administrative speed (0.61 vs. 0.39); and career services over social activities (0.60 vs. 0.40). Affordability and brand prestige were nearly balanced (0.49 vs. 0.51). These are pairwise results, not a global ranking. Price-focused strategies risk an "influx of unqualified students". The burnout- and strain-related theme made up 12.97% of codings, linked to bureaucracy, unregulated agencies, and lack of vision. Satisfaction appears to require balancing prestige, career, and administrative processes. Findings rest on ISO staff views from an Istanbul-Ankara sample and cannot be generalized nationally.

PDF (Turkish)

References

  1. Bamford, D., Moschini, R., & Tschirhart, C. (2022). Understanding and improving the student experience in higher education: Navigating the third space. Routledge.
  2. Boduroğlu, G. (2025). Uluslararası öğrencilerin akademik ve sosyal hayata uyum sorunlarının incelenmesi: Çorum ili örneği. Üniversite Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8(1), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.32329/uad.1606764
  3. Bulut-Şahin, B., & Eriçok, B. (2023). Türkiye'de yükseköğretimin uluslararasılaşmasında ulusal stratejiler ve kurumsal yönetim. Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi, 13(3), 1915–1937. https://doi.org/10.30783/nevsosbilen.1341529
  4. Child, J. (1972). Organizational structure, environment and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology, 6(1), 1–22.
  5. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
  6. Gonultas, M., Kul, A., & Al-Khatib, A. (2023). International students' adaptation problems and strategies for coping with these problems: A case study. Journal of Mugla Sitki Kocman University Faculty of Education, 10(1), 60–69. https://doi.org/10.21666/muefd.1096957
  7. Herget, A. (2016, August 18). Foreign-born faculty face challenges. HigherEdJobs. https://www.higheredjobs.com/articles/articleDisplay.cfm?ID=1012
  8. Hrebiniak, L. G., & Joyce, W. F. (1985). Organizational adaptation: Strategic choice and environmental determinism. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 30, 336–349. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392666
  9. Maslach, C. (1982). Burnout: The cost of caring. Prentice-Hall.
  10. Mazzarol, T., & Soutar, G. N. (2002). The "push-pull" factors influencing international student selection of education destination. International Journal of Educational Management, 16(2), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540210418403
  11. Mete, M., & Özgenel, M. (2021). Uluslararası yükseköğretim öğrencilerinin Türkiye'yi tercih etme nedenlerinin ve beklentilerinin incelenmesi. Stratejik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 5(3), 739–753. https://doi.org/10.30692/sisad.936010
  12. Nguyen, B., Melewar, T. C., & Hemsley-Brown, J. (Eds.). (2019). Strategic brand management in higher education. Routledge.
  13. Özoğlu, M., Gur, B., & Coşkun, İ. (2012). Küresel eğilimler ışığında Türkiye’de uluslararası öğrenciler. SETA Yayınları.
  14. Porter, M. E. (1996). What is strategy? Harvard Business Review, 74(6), 61–78.
  15. Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process: Planning, priority setting, resource allocation. McGraw-Hill.
  16. Saaty, T. L. (2003). Decision-making with the AHP: Why is the principal eigenvector necessary. European Journal of Operational Research, 145(1), 85–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00227-8
  17. Safawi, S. S. (2025). Türkiye’deki uluslararası öğrencilerin yükseköğretime uyumları: Bir meta-sentez çalışması. Mersin Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü. https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=tr&user=vvJ6xNAAAAAJ&citation_for_view=vvJ6xNAAAAAJ:eQOLeE2rZwMC
  18. Uğurlu, C., & Deniz, O. (2022). Uluslararası öğrenciler için uzaktan eğitimin sürdürülebilirliği ve fırsat eşitliği: Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi örneği. Van İnsani ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 3, 116–134.
  19. Woodruff, R. B. (1997). Customer value: The next source for competitive advantage. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25(2), 139–153.
  20. Yükseköğretim Kurulu Başkanlığı. (2025). Yükseköğretim Bilgi Yönetim Sistemi İstatistikleri. https://istatistik.yok.gov.tr/
  21. Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2–22.