Vol. 14 No. 1 (2026): Business & Management Studies: An International Journal
Articles

The relationship between university–industry collaboration, absorptive capacity, and technological innovation: Evidence from Turkey

PDF
  • Esra Ovalı
Esra Ovalı
Asst. Prof., Istanbul Okan University, Istanbul, Türkiye
Bio

Published 2026-03-25

Keywords

  • Collaborations, Absorptive Capacity, Technological Innovation
  • İş Birlikleri, Özümseme Kapasitesi, Teknolojik Yenilik

How to Cite

The relationship between university–industry collaboration, absorptive capacity, and technological innovation: Evidence from Turkey. (2026). Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 14(1), 370-388. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v14i1.2709

Copyright (c) 2026 Esra Ovalı

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

The relationship between university–industry collaboration, absorptive capacity, and technological innovation: Evidence from Turkey. (2026). Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 14(1), 370-388. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v14i1.2709

Abstract

University-Industry Collaborations (UICs) are a priority in the literature as significant research areas. However, the relationship between university-industry collaborations and technological innovation performance is still in its infancy in emerging countries, such as Turkey. This research aims to investigate the relationships among UICs, firms' absorptive capacity (both potential and realized), and technological innovations (exploitative and exploratory). The research gap in this area continues. Thus, drawing on a mediation analysis of 170 firms in Istanbul, this study finds a positive relationship between UICs and potential absorptive capacity (PACAP), realized absorptive capacity (RACAP), and exploitative technological innovation. RACAP positively affects exploitative and explorative technological innovations and mediates the relationship between UICs and exploitative technological innovation. PACAP positively influences RACAP. Based on these findings, the research discusses theoretical and practical implications.

PDF

References

  1. Ajmal, M., Helo, P., Kassem, R. (2017). Conceptualising trust with a cultural perspective in international business operations. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 24(4), 1099-1118.
  2. Alcalde, H., Guerrero, M. (2016). Open business models in entrepreneurial stages: Evidence from young Spanish firms during expansionary and recessionary periods. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 12 (2), 393–413.
  3. Akgün, A. E., Senturk, H. A., Keskin, H., & Onal, I. (2020). The relationships among nostalgic emotion, destination images and tourist behaviors: An empirical study of Istanbul. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 16, 100355.
  4. Aliasghar, O., Rose, E. L., Chetty, S. (2019). Where to search for process innovations? The mediating role of absorptive capacity and its impact on process innovation. Industrial Marketing Management, 82, 199-212.
  5. Al-Tabbaa, O., Ankrah, S. (2018). Engineered University-Industry Collaboration: A Social Capital Perspective. European Management Review, 1-23.
  6. Ankrah, S., Al-Tabbaa, O. (2015). University-industry collaborations: A systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 31, 387-408.
  7. Apa, R., Marchi, V., Grandinetti, R., Sedita, S. R. (2021). University-SME collaboration and innovation performance: the role of informal relationships and absorptive capacity. Journal of Technology Transfer, 46, 961-988.
  8. Asree, S., Cherikh, M., Gopalan, S. 2018. The Impact of Supply Chain Responsiveness and Strategic Supply Chain Collaboration on Innovation Performance. Business Performance and Supply Chain Modelling, 10(2), 131-145.
  9. Arza, V., Carattoli, M., 2017. Personal ties in university-industry linkages: a case-study from Argentina. Journal of Technology Transfer, 42 (4), 814-840.
  10. Bagozzi, R. P., Yi, Y., Phillips, L. W. (1991). Assessing Construct Validity in Organizational Research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 421-458.
  11. Baron, R. M., Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
  12. Belderbos, R., Gilsing, V.A., Suzuki, S., (2016). Direct and mediated ties to universities: "Scientific" absorptive capacity and innovation performance of pharmaceutical firms. Strategic Organization, 14 (1), 32–52.
  13. Belderbos, R., Carree, M., Lokshin, B., Veugelers, R. (2004). Heterogeneity in R&D cooperation strategies. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 22 (8-9), 1237-1263.
  14. Becker, J.-M., Klein, K., Wetzels, M. (2012). Hierarchical Latent Variable Models in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for Using Reflective-Formative Type Models. Long Range Planning, 45(5-6), 359-394.
  15. Bekkers, R., Bodas Freitas, I.M., 2008. Analysing knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: to what degree do sectors also matter? Research Policy, 37, 1837–1853.
  16. Benner, M. J., Tushman, M. L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: the productivity Dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28, 238–256.
  17. Bower, D. J. (1992). Company and Campus Partnership. London, U.K.: Routledge.
  18. Bruneel, Johan, Pablo D'Este, and Ammon Salter. (2010). Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university–industry collaboration. Research Policy. 39 (7), 858–868.
  19. Camison, C., Forés, F. (2010). Knowledge absorptive capacity: New insights for its conceptualisation and measurement. Journal of Business Research, 63, 707-715.
  20. Chang, C., Chang, Y.Y., Tsao, Y.C., Kraus, S. (2022). The power of knowledge management: how top management team bricolage boosts ambidexterity and performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 26(11), 188-213.
  21. Chang, Y., Wong, S.F., Eze, U., Lee, H. (2019). The effect of IT ambidexterity and cloud computing absorptive capacity on competitive advantage. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 119(3), 613-638.
  22. Chin, W. W. (1998). Commentary: Issue and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling. MIS Quarterly, 22(1), 1-10.
  23. Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., Newsted, P. R. A. (2003). Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic-Mail Emotion/Adoption Study. Information Systems Research, 14(2), 189-217.
  24. Cho, H.E., Jeong, I., Kim, E., and Cho, J. (2022). Achieving superior performance in international markets: the roles of organisational agility and absorptive capacity. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print.
  25. Cohen, W. M., Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (1), 128-152.
  26. Cohen, W. M., Levinthal, D. A. (1994). Fortune Favors the Prepared Firm. Management Science, 40(2), 169-284.
  27. Daft, Richard L., Weick, K. E. (1984). Toward a Model of Organization as Interpretation Systems. The Academy of Management Review, 9(2),284-295.
  28. Do, H., Pawan, B., Shipton, H., Nguyen, H-D, Nguyen, B. (2022). Building organisational resilience, innovation through resource-based management initiatives, organisational learning, and environmental dynamism. Journal of Business Research, 141, 808-821.
  29. Dyer, J. H., Kale, P., Singh, H. (2001). How to make strategic alliances work. MIT Sloan Management Review, 42, 37–43.
  30. Ebers, M., Maurer, I. (2014). Connections count: how relational embeddedness and relational empowerment foster absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 43 (2), 318–332.
  31. Enkel, E., Heil, S., Hengstler, M., Wirth, H. (2017). Exploratory and exploitative innovation: To what extent do the dimensions of individual-level absorptive capacity contribute? Technovation, 60-61, 29-38.
  32. Enkel, E., Karoline B. (2016). Why do experts contribute to cross-industry innovation? A structural model of motivational factors, intention, and behavior, 46(S1),207-226.
  33. Escribano, A., Fosfuri, A., Tríbolo, J. A. (2009). Managing external knowledge flows: the moderating role of absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 38 (1), 96–105.
  34. Eun, J. H., Lee, K., Wu, G. (2006). Explaining the University-rub enterprises in China: A theoretical framework for university-industry relationship in developing countries and its application to China. Research Policy, 35, 1329-1346.
  35. Ferreras-Méndez, J.L., Newell, S., Fernández-Mesa, A., Alegre, J., (2015). Depth and breadth of external knowledge search and performance: the mediating role of absorptive capacity. Industrial Marketing Management, 47, 86–97.
  36. Floyd, S. W., Wooldridge, B. J. (1992). Middle management involvement in strategy and its association with strategic type: A research note. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 153–167.
  37. Fornell, C., Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382-388.
  38. Fritsch, M., Kauffeld-Monz, M. (2010). The impact of network structure on knowledge transfer: An application of social network analysis in the context of regional innovation networks. The Annals of Regional Science, 44(1), 21–38.
  39. Flor, M. L., Cooper, S. Y., Oltra, M. J. (2018). External knowledge search, absorptive capacity, and radical innovation in high-technology firms. European Management Journal. 36 (2), 183-194.
  40. García-Morales, V. J., Ruiz-Moreno, A., Llorens-Montes, F. J. (2007). Effects of Technology Absorptive Capacity and Technology Proactivity on Organizational Learning, Innovation, and Performance: An Empirical Examination. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 19(4), 527-558.
  41. George, G., Zahra, S.A., Wood, D.R. (2002). The effects of business–university alliances on innovative output and financial performance: a study of publicly traded biotechnology companies. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(6), 577–609.
  42. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology. 78 (6): 1360–80.
  43. Grimpe, C., Sofka, W. (2009). Search patterns and absorptive capacity: Low-and high-technology sectors in European countries. Research Policy, 38 (3), 495–506.
  44. Gudergan, S. P., Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., Will, A. (2008). Confirmatory tetrad analysis in PLS path modeling. Journal of Business Research, 61(12), 1238-1249.
  45. Gupta, A.K., Smith, K.G., Shalley, C.E. (2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 693–706.
  46. Hagedoorn, J., Duysters, G. Learning in dynamic inter-firm networks: the efficacy of multiple contacts. (2002). Organization Studies, 23 (4), 525–548.
  47. Harhoff, D., Mueller, E., Van Reenen, J. (2014). What are the channels for technology sourcing? Panel data evidence from German companies. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 23, 204–224.
  48. Holsapple, C. W., Singh, M. (2005). Performance Implications of the Knowledge Chain. International Journal of Knowledge Management, 1(4), 1-22.
  49. Hayton, J. C., Zahra, S. A. (2005). Venture team human capital and absorptive capacity in high technology new ventures. International Journal of Technology Management, 31 (3/4), 256–274.
  50. Henseler, J., Srarstedt, M. (2013). Goodness-of-Fit Indicators for Partial Least Squares Path Modeling. Computational Statistics, 28(2), 565-580.
  51. Hemmert, M., Bstieler, L., Okamuro, H. (2014). Bridging the cultural divide: Trust formation in university-industry research collaborations in the US, Japan, and South Korea. Technovation, 34 (10), 605-616.
  52. Hurley, R. F., G. Hult, G. T. M. (1998). Innovation, Market Orientation, and Organizational Learning: An Integration and Empirical Examination. Journal of Marketing, 62(3),42-54.
  53. Ireland, R. D., Hitt, M. A., Vaidyanath, D. (2002). Alliance management as a source of competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 28 (3), 413-46.
  54. Jiang, W., Zhao, X. (2021), Trust and the intent to cooperate in energy performance contracting for public buildings in China. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 28(1), 372-396.
  55. Jansen, J.P., Van Den Bosch, F., Volberda, H.W., (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: effects of organisational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, 52(11), 1661–1674.
  56. Kafouros, M., Love, J. H., Ganotakis, P., Konara, P. (2020). Experience in R&D collaborations, innovative performance and the moderating effect of different dimensions of absorptive capacity. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 150, 1-14.
  57. Khan, S. N., Hussain, R. I., Rehman, S. U., Maqbool, M. Q., Ali E. I. E., Numan, M., Ntim, C. G. (2019). The mediating role of innovation between corporate governance and organisational performance: Moderating role of innovative culture in Pakistan textile sector. Cogent Business & Management, 6(1),1-23.
  58. Kleiner-Schaefer, T., & Schaefer, K. J. (2022). Barriers to university–industry collaboration in an emerging market: Firm-level evidence from Turkey. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 47(3), 872-905.
  59. Kumar, N., Stern, L. W., Anderson, J. C. (1993). Conducting Interorganizational Research Using Key Informants. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1633-1651.
  60. Kunz, W., Schmitt, B., Meyer, A. (2011). How does perceived firm innovativeness affect the consumer? Journal of Business Research, 64 (8), 816–822.
  61. Lane, P. J., Koka, B. R., Pathak, S. (2006). The Reification of Absorptive Capacity: A Critical Review and Rejuvenation of the Construct. Academy of Management Review, 31 (4), 833-863.
  62. Leiponen, A., Helfat, C. E. (2010). Innovation objectives, knowledge sources, and the benefits of breadth. Strategic Management Journal, 31 (2), 224–236.
  63. Lichtenthaler, U., Lichtenthaler,E. (2009). A Capability-Based Framework for Open Innovation: Complementing Absorptive Capacity. Journal of Management Studies, 46(8),1315-1338.
  64. Li, D., Eden, L., Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D. (2008). Friends, acquaintances, or strangers? Partner selection in R&D alliances. Academy of Management Journal, 51(2), 315–334.
  65. Liu, S., Moizer, J., Megicks, P., Kasturiratne, D., Jayawickrama, U. (2014). A knowledge chain management framework to support integrated decisions in global chains. Production Planning & Control, 25 (8), 639-649.
  66. Lu, C., Yu, B., Zhang, J., Xu, D. (2021). Effects of open innovation strategies on innovation performance of SMEs: evidence from China. Chinese Management Studies, 15(1), 24-43.
  67. Luo, Y., Sun, J., Wang, L. S. (2011). Emerging economy copycats: Capability, environment, and strategy. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(2), 37–56.
  68. Makri, M., Hitt, M.A., Lane, P.J., (2010). Complementary technologies, knowledge relaedness, and invention outcomes in high technology mergers and acquisitions. Strategic Management Journal. 31 (6), 602–628.
  69. Mention, A.L. (2011). Co-operation and co-opetition as open innovation practices in the service sector: which influence on innovation novelty?. Technovation, 31 (1), 44-53.
  70. Motohashi, K. (2005). University-industry collaborations in Japan: The role of new technology-based firms in transforming the National Innovation System. Research Policy, 34(5),583-594.
  71. Muraliraj, J., Kuppusamy, S., Zailani, S., Santha, C. Lean, (2018). Six Sigma and its influence on potential and realized absorptive capacity. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 11(1), 1-42.
  72. Minbaeva, D. B., Pedersen, T., Björkman, I., Fey, C. F., Park, H. J. (2003). MNC knowledge transfer, subsidiary absorptive capacity and HRM. Journal of International Business Studies. 34 (6), 586-599.
  73. Nijssen, E. J., Hillebrand, B., Jong, J. P. J., Kemp, R.G. M. (2012). Strategic value assessment and explorative learning opportunities with customers. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(S1), 91–102.
  74. Nooteboom, B., (2000). Learning and Innovation in Organisations and Economies. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  75. Nsanzumuhire, S.U., Groot, W. (2020). Context perspective on University-Industry Collaboration processes: A systematic review of literature. Journal of Cleaner Production, 258, 120861.
  76. Okuyama, R. (2017). Importance of tacit knowledge in incremental innovations: implications from drug discovery cases. Journal of Strategy and Management, 10 (1), 118-130.
  77. Patel, P.C., Kohtamäki, M., Parida, V., Wincent, J. (2015). Entrepreneurial orientation‐as experimentation and firm performance: the enabling role of absorptive capacity. Strategic Management Journal, 36(11), 1739-1749.
  78. Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D'Este, P., Fini, R., Geuna, A., Grimaldi, R., Hughes, A., Krabel, S., Kitson, M., Llerena, P., Lissoni, F., Salter, A., Sobrero, M. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: a review of the literature on university–industry relations. Research Policy, 42 (2), 423–442.
  79. Petruzzelli, A. M., Rotolo, D. (2015). Institutional diversity, internal search behaviour, and joint-innovations: Evidence from the US biotechnology industry. Management Decision, 53(9), 2088-2106.
  80. Protogerou, A., Caloghirou, Y., Vonortas, N. S. (2017). Determinants of young firms' innovative performance: Empirical evidence from Europe, 46(7),1312-1326.
  81. Podsakoff, P. M., Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organisational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531-544.
  82. Podsakoff, P., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common Methon Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
  83. Radosevic, S., (2011). Science–industry links in central and Eastern Europe and the commonwealth of independent states: conventional policy wisdom facing reality. Science and Public Policy, 38 (5), 365–378.
  84. Rapini, M. S., Albuquerque, E. M., Chave, C. V., Silva, L. A., L. A., Souza, S. G. A., Righi, H. M., Wellington, M. S. C. (2009). University-industry interactions in an immature system of innovation: evidence from Minas Gerais, Brazil. Science and Public Policy, 36 (5), 373-386.
  85. Santoro, M.D., Chakrabarti, A.K., (2002). Firm size and technology centrality in industry–university interactions. Research Policy, 31, 1163–1180.
  86. Santoro, M.D., Betts, S. (2002). Making Industry-University Partnerships Work. Research TechnologyManagement, 45(3), 42-46.
  87. Santoro, M. D., Saparito, P. (2003). The firm's trust in its university partner as a key mediator in advancing knowledge and new technologies. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 50 (3), 362-373.
  88. Santoro, M. D., Bierly, P.E.(2006). Facilitators of Knowledge Transfer in University-Industry Collaborations: A Knowledge-Based Perspective, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 53 (4), 495-507.
  89. Santoro, G., Bresciani, S., Papa, A. (2018). Collaborative modes with cultural and creative industries and innovation performance: The moderating role of heterogenous sources of knowledge and absorptive capacity. Technovation, 92-93, 102040.
  90. Schweisfurth, T. G., Raasch, C. (2018). Absorptive capacity for need knowledge: Antecedents and effects for employee innovativeness. Research Policy, 47(4), 687-699.
  91. Slavova, K., Jong, S., (2021). University alliances and firm exploratory innovations: Evidence from therapeutic product development. Technovation, 107, 102310.
  92. Steinmo, M., Rasmussen, E. (2018). The interplay of cognitive and relational social capital dimensions in university-industry collaboration: Overcoming the experience barrier. Research Policy, 47(10),1964-1974.
  93. Subramaniam, M., Youndt, M. A. (2005). The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Academy of Management Journal. 48(3), 450–463.
  94. Suzigan, W., Albuquerque, E., Garcia, R., Rapini, M. (2009). University and industry linkages in Brazil: some preliminary and descriptive results. Seoul Journal of Economics, 22 (4), 591-611.
  95. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., Shuen, A. (1998). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal. 18(7), 509–533.
  96. Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities:the nature and microfoundations of(sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350.
  97. Thrane, S., Blaabjerg, S., Moller, R.H., (2010). Innovative path dependence: making sense of product and service innovation in path dependent innovation processes. Research Policy, 39 (7), 932–944.
  98. Tsai, K-H. (2009). Collaborative networks and product innovation performance: Toward a contingency perspective. Research Policy, 38(5), 765-778.
  99. Tsai,K. (2001). Knowledge Transfer in Intraorganizational Networks:Effects of Network Position and Absorptive Capacity on Business Unit Innovation and Performance. The Academy of Management Journal,44(5),996-1004.
  100. Temel, S., Scholten, V., Akdeniz, R. C., Fortuin, F., & Omta, O. (2013). University–industry collaboration in Turkish SMEs: Investigation of a U-shaped relationship. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 14(2), 103-115.
  101. Usunier, J.-C. (2011). The shift from manufacturing to brand origin: Suggestions for improving COO relevance. International Marketing Review, 28(5), 486-496.
  102. Veugelers, R., Cassiman, B. (2005). R&D cooperation between firms and universities. Some empirical evidence from Belgian manufacturing. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 23 (5-6), 355–379.
  103. Voudouris, I., Lioukas, S., Iatrelli, M., Caloghirou, Y., (2012). Effectiveness of technology investment: Impact of internal technological capability, networking and investment's strategic importance. Technovation, 32 (6), 400–414.
  104. Wang, Z., Ling, J., Chok, J. I. (2020). Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 57, 1-14.
  105. Wu, J., Harrigan, K. R., Ang, S. H., Wu, Z. (2019). The impact of imitation strategy and R&D resources on incremental and radical innovation: evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms. Journal of Technology Transfer, 44, 210-230.
  106. Wang, Y., Sun, H., Jia, T., Chen, J. (2021). The impact of buyer–supplier interaction on ambidextrous innovation and business performance: the moderating role of competitive environment. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 32(2),673-695.
  107. Williams, J., MacKinnon, D. (2008). Resampling and Distribution of the Product Methods for Testing Indirect Effects in Complex Models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 15(1), 23-51.
  108. Wright, M., Clarysseb, B., Lockett, A., Knockaertd, M. (2008). Mid-range universities' linkages with industry: Knowledge types and the role of intermediaries. Research Policy, 37(8), 1205-1223.
  109. Zahra, S.A., George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualisation, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27 (2), 185–203.
  110. Zhang, Z., Luo, T. (2020). Network capital, exploitative and exploratory innovations-from the perspective of network dynamics. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 152, 119910.
  111. Zhang, S., Han, C., Chen, C. (2022). Repeated partnership in university-industry collaboration portfolio and firm innovation performance: roles of absorptive capacity and political connections. R&D Management.
  112. Zhang, F., Zhu, L. (2021). Social media strategic capability, organisational unlearning, and disruptive innovation of SMEs: The moderating roles of TMT heterogeneity and environmental dynamism. Journal of Business Research, 133, 183-193.
  113. Zou, T., Ertug, G., George, G. (2018). The capacity to innovate: a meta-analysis of absorptive capacity. Organization & Management, 1-35.
  114. Zucker, L.G., Darby, M.R., Armstrong, J. (2002). Commercialising Knowledge: University Science, Knowledge Capture, and Firm Performance in Biotechnology. Management Science, 48(1), 138–153.