Cilt 6 Sayı 4 (2018): BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT STUDIES: AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL
Makaleler

İŞ TATMİNİ ÖRGÜTSEL KİMLİK VE İŞE TUTKUNLUK ARASINDA ARACI DEĞİŞKEN OLARAK MI DÜZENLEYİCİ DEĞİŞKEN OLARAK MI ROL ALMAKTADIR?

PDF (English)
  • Sevcan KILIÇ AKINCI
Sevcan KILIÇ AKINCI
Erzurum Teknik Üniversitesi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v6i4.353

Yayınlanmış 2019-01-03

Anahtar Kelimeler

  • İşe Tutkunlık,
  • İş Tatmini,
  • Örgütsel Kimlik,
  • Sosyal Kimlik Teorisi,
  • Türkiye

Nasıl Atıf Yapılır

KILIÇ AKINCI, S. (2019). İŞ TATMİNİ ÖRGÜTSEL KİMLİK VE İŞE TUTKUNLUK ARASINDA ARACI DEĞİŞKEN OLARAK MI DÜZENLEYİCİ DEĞİŞKEN OLARAK MI ROL ALMAKTADIR?. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 6(4), 1322–1335. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v6i4.353

Özet

Bu çalışma, artan iş doyumunun örgütsel kimlik ve işe tutkunluk arasındaki ilişkiye etkisiniSosyal Kimlik Teorisi bağlamında incelemekte ve bu ilişkiyi ABD dışında bir çevrede test ederek literatüre katkı sunmaktadır. Çalışma 10 farklı endüstride faaliyet gösteren 15 işletmeden beyaz ve mavi yakalı toplam 527çalışanı kapsayan geniş bir örneklem üzerinde test edilmiş ve veriler Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi ile analiz edilmiştir. Bulgular, örgütsel kimliğin işe adanma ile pozitif ilişkili olduğunu göstermiştir. İş doyumu örgütsel kimlik ile işe adanma arasındaki ilişkiyi düzenleyici değişken olarak yer almamış, aracı değişken olarak ilişkinin %54’ünü açıklamış ve böylece Sosyal Kimlik Teorisinin Türkiye’deki bir örneklem üzerinde geçerli olduğunu ispatlamıştır. Sonuçlar, kimlik hissinin işe adanma konusunda bir ön koşul olduğunu fakat bunu güçlendiren değişkenin iş doyumu olduğunu göstermiştir. 

PDF (English)

İndirmeler

İndirme verileri henüz mevcut değil.

Referanslar

  1. Abraham; S. (2012). Job Satisfaction as an Antecedent to Employee Engagement. SIES Journal of Management; 8(2); 27–36.
  2. Ashforth; B. E.; & Mael; F. (1989). Social Identity Theory and the Organization. Academy of Management Review; 14(1); 20–39. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4278999
  3. Avery; D. R.; McKay; P. F.; & Wilson; D. C. (2007). Engaging the Aging Workforce: The Relationship Between Perceived Age Similarity; Satisfaction With Coworkers; and Employee Engagement. Journal of Applied Psychology; 92(6); 1542–1556. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1542
  4. Bakker; A. B.; & Schaufeli; W. B. (2008). Positive Organizational Behavior: Engaged Employees in Flourishing Organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior; 29(2); 147–154. https://doi.org/doi:10.1002/job.515
  5. Baumruk; R. (2004). The Missing Link : The Role of Employee Engagement in Business Success. Workspan; ABI/ INFORM; 47; 48–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2
  6. Bernstein; D. A.; & Nash; P. W. (2008). Essentials of Psychology. Boston; MA: Houghton Mifflin.
  7. Boroş; S. (2008). Organizational Identification : Theoretical and Empirical Analyses of Competing Conceptualizations. Cognitie; Creier; Comportament / Cognition; Brain; Behavior; 12(1); 1–27.
  8. Cartwright; S.; & Holmes; N. (2006). The Meaning of Work: The Challenge of Regaining Employee Engagement and Reducing Cynicism. Human Resource Management Review; 16(2); 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2006.03.012
  9. Cohen; J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale; N.J.; US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  10. Dutton; J. E.; Dukerich; J. M.; & Harquail; C. V. (1994). Organizational Images and Member Identification. Administrative Science Quarterly; 39(2); 239. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393235
  11. Edwards; M. R.; & Peccei; R. (2007). Organizational Identification: Development and Testing of a Conceptually Grounded Measure. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology; 16(1); 25–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320601088195
  12. Frank; F.; Finnegan; R.; & Taylor; C. (2004). The Race for Talent: Retaining and Engaging Workers in the 21st Century. Human Resource Planning; 27(3); 12–25.
  13. Gottfredson; G. D.; & Holland; J. L. (1990). A Longitudinal Test of the Influence of Congruence: Job Satisfaction; Competency Utilization; and Counterproductive Behavior. Journal of Counseling Psychology; 37(4); 389–398. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.37.4.389
  14. Gümüş; M.; Hamarat; B.; Çolak; E.; & Duran; E. (2012). Organizational and Occupational Identification: Relations to Teacher Satisfaction and Intention to Early Retirement. Career Development International; 17(4); 300–313. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620431211255806
  15. Harter; J. K.; Schmidt; F. L.; & Hayes; T. L. (2002). Business-Unit-Level Relationship between Employee Satisfaction; Employee Engagement; and Business Outcomes A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology; 87(2); 268–279. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.268
  16. Hulin; C. L.; & Judge; T. A. (2003). Job Attitudes. In W. C. Borman; D. R. Ilgen; & R. Klimoski (Eds.); Handbook of Psychology; Volume 12: Industrial and Organizational Psychology (pp. 255–276). New Jersey; US: John Wiley & Sons Inc. https://doi.org/doi:10.1002/0471264385.wei1211
  17. Kahn; W. A. (1990). Psychological Conditions of Personal Engagement and Disengagement at Work. Academy of Management Journal; 33(4); 692–724. https://doi.org/10.2307/256287
  18. Kaiser; H. F. (1974). An Index of Factorial Simplicity. Psychometrika; 39(1); 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291575
  19. Karanika-Murray; M.; Duncan; N.; Pontes; H. M.; & Griffiths; M. D. (2015). Organizational Identification; Work engagement; and Job Satisfaction. Journal of Managerial Psychology; 30(8); 1019–1033. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-11-2013-0359
  20. Locke; E. A. (1976). The Nature and Causes of Job Satisfaction. In Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (pp. 1297–1350). Chicago; US: Rand McNally College Pub. Co.
  21. Mael; F.; & Ashforth; B. E. (1992). Alumni and Their Alma Mater: a Partial Test of the Reformulated Model of Organizational Identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior; 13(2); 103–123. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030130202
  22. March; J. G.; & Simon; H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York; US: Wiley.
  23. Mauno; S.; Kinnunen; U.; & Ruokolainen; M. (2006). Exploring Work- and Organization-Based Resources as Moderators Between Work–Family Conflict; Well-Being; and Job Attitudes. Work & Stress; 20(3); 210–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678370600999969
  24. Maylett; T. M.; & Riboldi; J. M. (2008). The Three Essential Components of Employee Engagement (Whitepaper). Retrieved from https://tr.scribd.com/document/66411061/Decision-Wise-Whitepaper-3-Essential-Components-of-Employee-Engagemen
  25. Ötken; A. B.; & Erben; G. S. (2010). Investigating the Relationship Between Organizational Identification and Work Engagement and the Role of Supervisor Support. Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi; 12(2); 93–118.
  26. Penna. (2005). Meaning at Work (Research Report - Coord. Trevor Lambert). London; UK. Retrieved from https://www.ciodevelopment.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/2006-10-08-08-36-31_Penna-Meaning-at-Work-Report.pdf
  27. R Core Team. (2018). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna; Austria. Retrieved from http://www.r-project.org/
  28. Revelle; W. (2018). psych: Procedures for Psychological; Psychometric; and Personality Research. Northwestern University. Evanston; Illinois; US. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/package=psych
  29. Rich; B. L.; Lepine; J. A.; & Crawford; E. R. (2010). Job Engagement: Antecedents and Effects on Job Performance. Academy of Management Journal; 53(3); 617–635. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.51468988
  30. Richman; A. (2006). Everyone Wants an Engaged Workforce How Can You Create It. Workspan; 49(1); 36–39.
  31. Riketta; M. (2005). Organizational identification: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior; 66(2); 358–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JVB.2004.05.005
  32. Ringle; C. M.; Wende; S.; & Will; A. (2015). Smart PLS. SmartPLS GmbH. Bönningstedt; DE. Retrieved from http://www.smartpls.de
  33. Robinson; D.; Perryman; S. P.; & Hayday; S. (2004). IES Report 408: The Drivers of Employee Engagement. . Institute for Employment Studies Report. Brighton; UK : Institute for Employment Studies. Retrieved from https://www.employment-studies.co.uk/system/files/resources/files/408.pdf
  34. Salanova; M.; Agut; S.; & Peiró; J. M. (2005). Linking Organizational Resources and Work Engagement to Employee Performance and Customer Loyalty: The Mediation of Service Climate. Journal of Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1217
  35. Salanova; M.; Llorens; S.; & Schaufeli; W. B. (2011). “Yes; I Can; I Feel Good; and I Just Do It!” On Gain Cycles and Spirals of Efficacy Beliefs; Affect; and Engagement. Applied Psychology; 60(2); 255–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2010.00435.x
  36. Schaufeli; W. B.; & Bakker; A. B. (2010). Defining and Measuring Work Engagement: Bringing Clarity to the Concept. In A. B. Bakker & M. P. Leiter (Eds.); Work Engagement: A Handbook of Essential Theory and Research (pp. 10–24). New York; NY; US: Psychology Press; Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203853047
  37. Schaufeli; W. B.; Salanova; M.; González-Romá; V.; & Bakker; A. B. (2002). The Measurement of Engagement and Burnout: A Two Sample Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach. Journal of Happiness Studies: An Interdisciplinary Forum on Subjective Well-Being; 3(1); 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326
  38. Shaw; K. (2005). An Engagement Strategy Process for Communicators. Strategic Communication Management; 9(3); 26–29.
  39. Simpson; M. R. (2009). Predictors of Work Engagement Among Medical-Surgical Registered Nurses. Western Journal of Nursing Research; 31(1); 44–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945908319993
  40. Spector; P. E. (1997). Job Satisfaction: Application; Assessment; Causes; and Consequences. California; US: SAGE Publications; Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452231549
  41. Spector; P. E. (2006). Method Variance in Organizational Research. Organizational Research Methods; 9(2); 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428105284955
  42. Tajfel; H. (1982). Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Annual Review of Psychology; 33(1); 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.000245
  43. Tajfel; H.; & Turner; J. C. (2004). The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. In J. T. Jost & J. Sidanius (Eds.); Political Psychology (In Series of Key Readings in Social Psychology) (pp. 276–293). New York; NY; US: Psychology Press.
  44. Tiwari; S. (2011). Employee Engagement - The Key to Organizational Success. In 10th International Conference on Operations and Quantitative Management (pp. 311–328). Nashik; India.
  45. Van Bogaert; P.; Clarke; S.; Willems; R.; & Mondelaers; M. (2013). Staff Engagement as a Target for Managing Work Environments in Psychiatric Hospitals: Implications for Workforce Stability and Quality of Care. Journal of Clinical Nursing; 22(11–12); 1717–1728. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04341.x
  46. Van Dick; R.; Christ; O.; Stellmacher; J.; Wagner; U.; Ahlswede; O.; Grubba; C.; … Tissington; P. A. (2004). Should I Stay or Should I Go? Explaining Turnover Intentions with Organizational Identification and Job Satisfaction. British Journal of Management; 15(4); 351–360. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2004.00424.x
  47. Weiss; H. M. (2002). Deconstructing Job Satisfaction: Separating Evaluations; Beliefs and Affective Experiences. Human Resource Management Review; 12(2); 173–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4822(02)00045-1
  48. Wright; T. A.; & Cropanzano; R. (2000). Psychological Well-Being and Job Satisfaction as Predictors of Job Performance. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology; 5(1); 84–94. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.5.1.84
  49. Yalabik; Z. Y.; Popaitoon; P.; Chowne; J. A.; & Rayton; B. A. (2013). Work Engagement as a Mediator Between Employee Attitudes and Outcomes. The International Journal of Human Resource Management; 24(14); 2799–2823. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2013.763844