Cilt 14 Sayı 3 (2026): Business & Management Studies: An International Journal
Makaleler

KOBİ’lerin küresel risk algısı ve sürdürülebilir inovasyon ilişkisi: Türkiye örneği

Şenay Şener
İstanbul Gedik Üniversitesi, İstanbul, Turkiye

Yayınlanmış 25.09.2026

Anahtar Kelimeler

  • Institutional Theory, Sustainable Innovation, Global Risk Perception
  • Kurumsal Teori, Sürdürülebilir İnovasyon, Küresel Risk Algısı

Nasıl Atıf Yapılır

KOBİ’lerin küresel risk algısı ve sürdürülebilir inovasyon ilişkisi: Türkiye örneği. (2026). Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 14(3), 1765-1784. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v14i3.2828

Nasıl Atıf Yapılır

KOBİ’lerin küresel risk algısı ve sürdürülebilir inovasyon ilişkisi: Türkiye örneği. (2026). Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 14(3), 1765-1784. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v14i3.2828

Öz

Bu çalışma, uluslararası ticaret yapan Türkiye’deki KOBİ’lerin küresel risk algıları, kurumsal baskılar ve sürdürülebilir inovasyon arasındaki ilişkileri incelemektedir. Veriler, 7 Aralık 2024 ile 20 Mart 2025 tarihleri arasında çevrim içi anket yoluyla toplanmış ve 342 eksiksiz yanıt analiz edilmiştir. Ölçüm modeli doğrulayıcı faktör analiziyle değerlendirilmiş; paralel çoklu aracılık analizi jamovi’de 5.000 yanlılığı düzeltilmiş bootstrap örneklemi kullanılarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bootstrap güven aralıkları, sosyal ve çevresel risk algılarının normatif baskı üzerinden sürdürülebilir inovasyonla dolaylı ilişkileri için sıfırı dışlamıştır. Düzenleyici ve bilişsel baskı üzerinden dolaylı etkiler istatistiksel olarak anlamlı değildir. Sosyal ve çevresel risk algılarının sürdürülebilir inovasyonla toplam ilişkileri pozitifken jeopolitik risk algısının toplam ilişkisi anlamlı değildir. Jeopolitik risk en yüksek, çevresel risk ise en düşük ortalamaya sahiptir. Bulgular, normatif baskının dolaylı rolüyle uyumlu sınırlı kanıt sunmakta; kesitsel tasarım nedensel mekanizmalar kurulmasına izin vermemektedir. Sonuçlar, KOBİ’lerde sürdürülebilir inovasyona yönelik kurumsal desteklerin dikkatle değerlendirilmesi gerektiğine işaret etmektedir.

Referanslar

  1. Adeseun, M. A., Anosike, A. I., Reyes, J. A. G., & Al-Talib, M. (2018). Supply chain risk perception: Understanding the gap between theory and practice. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 51(11), 1701–1706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.211
  2. Ahi, P., & Searcy, C. (2013). A comparative literature analysis of definitions for green and sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 52, 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.02.018
  3. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
  4. Aragón-Correa, J. A., Hurtado-Torres, N., Sharma, S., & García-Morales, V. J. (2008). Environmental strategy and performance in small firms: A resource-based perspective. Journal of Environmental Management, 86(1), 88–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.11.022
  5. Asgary, A., Ozdemir, A. I., & Özyürek, H. (2020). Small and medium enterprises and global risks: Evidence from manufacturing SMEs in Turkey. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 11(1), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-020-00247-0
  6. Bach, T. N., Hoang, K., & Le, T. (2025). Biodiversity risk and firm performance: Evidence from US firms. Business Strategy and the Environment, 34(1), 1113–1132. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4039
  7. Baldermann, S., Coeurderoy, R., Duplat, V., Oberhauser, M., & Schmid, S. (2026). After globalisation? The future of European multinationals in an era of geopolitical uncertainty. European Management Journal, 44(1), 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2025.09.006
  8. Bao, X., & Zhang, X. (2026). Climate risk perception and corporate green innovation: From cognitive awareness to behavioral response. Sustainability, 18(2), Article 752. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18020752
  9. Baur, A., & Flach, L. (2023). Protectionism on the rise? New challenges for EU trade policy. EconPol Forum, 24(5), 32–35. https://www.ifo.de/en/econpol/publications/2023/article-journal/protectionism-rise-new-challenges-eu-trade-policy
  10. Beets, G., & Willekens, F. (2009). The global economic crisis and international migration: An uncertain outlook. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 7, 19–37. https://doi.org/10.1553/populationyearbook2009s19
  11. Boons, F., Montalvo, C., Quist, J., & Wagner, M. (2013). Sustainable innovation, business models and economic performance: An overview. Journal of Cleaner Production, 45, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.08.013
  12. Bos-Brouwers, H. E. J. (2010). Sustainable innovation processes within small and medium-sized enterprises [Doctoral dissertation, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam]. VU Research Portal. https://research.vu.nl/en/publications/sustainable-innovation-processes-within-small-and-medium-sized-en/
  13. Çalık, E. (2021). Türkiye’deki imalat işletmelerinin sürdürülebilir inovasyon faaliyetleri. Verimlilik Dergisi, (3), 185–201. https://doi.org/10.51551/verimlilik.739778
  14. Calik, E. (2024). A validated measurement scale for sustainable product innovation performance. Technovation, 129, Article 102882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102882
  15. Calik, E., & Badurdeen, F. (2016). A measurement scale to evaluate sustainable innovation performance in manufacturing organizations. Procedia CIRP, 40, 449–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.01.091
  16. Carfora, A., Scandurra, G., & Thomas, A. (2021). Determinants of environmental innovations supporting small- and medium-sized enterprises sustainable development. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(5), 2621–2636. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2767
  17. Chatterjee, S., Chaudhuri, R., Shah, M., & Maheshwari, P. (2022). Big data driven innovation for sustaining SME supply chain operation in post COVID-19 scenario: Moderating role of SME technology leadership. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 168, Article 108058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2022.108058
  18. Chen, X., Yi, N., Zhang, L., & Li, D. (2018). Does institutional pressure foster corporate green innovation? Evidence from China’s top 100 companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 188, 304–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.257
  19. Chu, Z., Xu, J., Lai, F., & Collins, B. J. (2018). Institutional theory and environmental pressures: The moderating effect of market uncertainty on innovation and firm performance. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 65(3), 392–403. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2018.2794453
  20. Daddi, T., Bleischwitz, R., Todaro, N. M., Gusmerotti, N. M., & De Giacomo, M. R. (2020). The influence of institutional pressures on climate mitigation and adaptation strategies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 244, Article 118879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118879
  21. Deirmentzoglou, G. A., Anastasopoulou, E. E., & Theodorakopoulos, N. (2025). Geopolitical risks: Threats or opportunities in shaping entrepreneurial intentions? European Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 20(1), 184–190. https://doi.org/10.34190/ecie.20.1.3660
  22. Demirel, E. (2024). İşletme ve yönetim perspektifinden görsel haritalama tekniğiyle sürdürülebilir inovasyonun incelenmesi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Akşehir Meslek Yüksekokulu Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, (18), 139–154. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/akmyosb/issue/89878/1599434
  23. Dillard, J. F., Rigsby, J. T., & Goodman, C. (2004). The making and remaking of organization context: Duality and the institutionalization process. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 17(4), 506–542. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570410554542
  24. D’Ingiullo, D., & Evangelista, V. (2020). Institutional quality and innovation performance: Evidence from Italy. Regional Studies, 54(12), 1724–1736. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1765230
  25. Durst, S., & Leyer, M. (2022). The influence of institutional conditions on firms’ process innovation – Evidence from firms based on a multi-country analysis. The Bottom Line, 35(4), 161–184. https://doi.org/10.1108/BL-11-2021-0105
  26. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
  27. Gelmez, E., & Ergen Işıklar, Z. (2025). Yeşil inovasyon uygulamalarının işletme performansı üzerine etkisi. Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi Dergisi, 60(3), 2295–2309. https://doi.org/10.63556/tisej.2025.1477
  28. Günay, D., & Çalık, A. (2019). İnovasyon, icat, teknoloji ve bilim kavramları üzerine. Journal of University Research, 2(1), 1–11. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/uad/article/549654
  29. Hair, J. F., Jr., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.
  30. Hair, J. F., Jr., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
  31. Hauser, C. (2022). Trade-control compliance in SMEs: Do decision-makers and supply chain position make a difference? Journal of Business Ethics, 179(2), 473–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04825-0
  32. Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.
  33. Herold, D. M., & Marzantowicz, Ł. (2023). Supply chain responses to global disruptions and its ripple effects: An institutional complexity perspective. Operations Management Research, 16(4), 2213–2224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-023-00404-w
  34. Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  35. Kazan, G., & Uzun Kocamış, T. (2024). Tedarik zincirlerinde sürdürülebilir risk yönetimi: Çevresel, sosyal ve jeopolitik riskleri azaltma stratejileri. Bilgi Ekonomisi ve Yönetimi Dergisi, 19(1), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.54860/beyder.1482356
  36. Kazdal, Ö. S., Çelik, D., & Tenderis, A. (2025). Yeşil inovasyon ve kurumsal sürdürülebilirliğin firma performansına etkisi: Örgütsel değişime açıklığın aracılık rolü. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (68), 351–380. https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.1611291
  37. Ketata, I., Sofka, W., & Grimpe, C. (2015). The role of internal capabilities and firms’ environment for sustainable innovation: Evidence for Germany. R&D Management, 45(1), 60–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12052
  38. Klewitz, J., & Hansen, E. G. (2014). Sustainability-oriented innovation of SMEs: A systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.017
  39. KOSGEB. (2023, 22 Aralık). Küçük ve orta büyüklükteki girişim istatistikleri, 2022. https://www.kosgeb.gov.tr/site/tr/genel/detay/9057/kucuk-ve-orta-buyuklukteki-girisim-istatistikleri-2022
  40. KOSGEB. (2024). KOSGEB 2023 yılı faaliyet raporu [KOSGEB 2023 annual activity report]. https://webdosya.kosgeb.gov.tr/Content/Upload/Dosya/Mevzuat/2024/KOSGEB_2023_Y%C4%B1l%C4%B1_Faaliyet_Raporu.pdf
  41. Krammer, S. M. S., & Kafouros, M. I. (2022). Facing the heat: Political instability and firm new product innovation in sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 39(5), 604–642. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12623
  42. Kuzgun, Ş., & Gözükara, E. (2023). Örgütsel dayanıklılık kapasitesi, yeşil yenilik, algılanan yeşil örgütsel davranış ve sürdürülebilirlik performansı arasındaki ilişkiler: ISO 500 uygulaması. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 21(49), 399–432. https://doi.org/10.35408/comuybd.1230408
  43. Lam, L. W. (2012). Impact of competitiveness on salespeople’s commitment and performance. Journal of Business Research, 65(9), 1328–1334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.10.026
  44. Liao, Y., He, J., Zhang, X., & Zhao, J. (2026). Weathering the storm: Climate risk perception and digital innovation in firms with exposure to the grain sector. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 10, Article 1829332. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2026.1829332
  45. Liao, Z., Chen, K., & Ren, X. (2025). Star CEOs and firms’ environmental innovation: The role of interdependent self-construal and risk perception. Business Strategy and the Environment, 34(3), 2993–3007. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4146
  46. Mariotti, S. (2024). “Win-lose” globalization and the weaponization of economic policies by nation-states. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 20(5), 638–659. https://doi.org/10.1108/cpoib-09-2023-0089
  47. Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11(3), 320–341. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2
  48. Martínez-Román, J. A., Gamero, J., Delgado-González, M. de L., & Tamayo, J. A. (2019). Innovativeness and internationalization in SMEs: An empirical analysis in European countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 148, Article 119716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119716
  49. Minbaeva, D., Narula, R., Phene, A., & Fitzsimmons, S. (2025). Beyond global mobility: How human capital shapes the MNE in the 21st century. Journal of International Business Studies, 56(2), 136–150. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-024-00755-x
  50. Mirza, D., Der Sarkisian, R., & Zaki, C. (2021). Geographical exposure to conflicts and firm performance: Evidence from the MENA region (ERF Working Paper No. 1458). Economic Research Forum. https://erf.org.eg/publications/geographical-exposure-to-conflicts-and-firm-performance-evidence-from-the-mena-region/
  51. Nadeem, M. A., Liu, Z., Ali, H. S., Younis, A., Bilal, M., & Xu, Y. (2020). Innovation and sustainable development: Does aid and political instability impede innovation? SAGE Open, 10(4), Article 2158244020973021. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020973021
  52. Naradda Gamage, S. K., Ekanayake, E. M. S., Abeyrathne, G. A. K. N. J., Prasanna, R. P. I. R., Jayasundara, J. M. S. B., & Rajapakshe, P. S. K. (2019). Global challenges and survival strategies of the SMEs in the era of economic globalization: A systematic review (MPRA Paper No. 98419). Munich Personal RePEc Archive. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/98419/
  53. Oğul, B. (2022). Türkiye’de çevresel teknolojik inovasyonlar ekolojik ayak izini azaltıyor mu? ARDL sınır testi analizi. İnönü Üniversitesi Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11(2), 409–427. https://doi.org/10.54282/inijoss.1116874
  54. Piñera-Salmerón, J., Sanz-Valle, R., & Jiménez-Jiménez, D. (2023). Product and business process innovation, competitive advantage and export performance. Multinational Business Review, 31(4), 545–564. https://doi.org/10.1108/MBR-03-2022-0045
  55. Poot, J., & Strutt, A. (2010). International trade agreements and international migration. The World Economy, 33(12), 1923–1954. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2010.01299.x
  56. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
  57. Qian, X., & Qiu, S. (2023). Political risk and corporate international supply chain. Journal of International Money and Finance, 137, Article 102899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2023.102899
  58. Rehman, O. U., Liu, J., & Wu, K. (2023). Political uncertainty and corporate innovations: Does firm-level risk matter? [Preprint]. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4334441
  59. Romanello, R., Karami, M., Gerschewski, S., Evers, N., & He, C. X. (2022). International opportunity development of born global firms: The role of institutions. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 18(3), 303–337. https://doi.org/10.1108/cpoib-02-2020-0013
  60. Roscoe, S., Aktas, E., & Allen, R. (2022). Strategic decision-making logic in global supply chains under environmental ecosystems and geopolitical disruption. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 42(8), 1120–1145.
  61. Ruzzier, M., Hisrich, R. D., & Antoncic, B. (2006). SME internationalization research: Past, present, and future. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 13(4), 476–497. https://doi.org/10.1108/14626000610705705
  62. Saeed, M. A., & Kersten, W. (2019). Drivers of sustainable supply chain management: Identification and classification. Sustainability, 11(4), Article 1137. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041137
  63. Sarrakh, R., Renukappa, S., & Suresh, S. (2020, September 2–4). External drivers for embedding sustainability practices within the Qatar oil and gas industry: An institutional theory perspective [Conference paper]. BAM 2020 Conference in the Cloud, British Academy of Management. https://hdl.handle.net/2436/623361
  64. Scott, W. R. (2014). Unplugged – My own book review. M@n@gement, 17(2), 136–140. https://doi.org/10.3917/mana.172.0136
  65. Şenocak, B., & Bursalı, Y. (2018). İşletmelerde çevresel sürdürülebilirlik bilinci ve yeşil işletmecilik uygulamaları ile işletme başarısı arasındaki ilişki. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(1), 161–183. https://izlik.org/JA56MF63ZJ
  66. Sinani, E., & Zilja, F. (2025). International high-tech SMEs amid geopolitical pressures. British Journal of Management, 36(2), 867–884. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12875
  67. Singh, S., Dhir, S., Mukunda Das, V., & Sharma, A. (2025). Analyzing institutional factors influencing the national innovation system. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 16(8), 1445–1466. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-05-2023-0063
  68. Thakkar, J., Kanda, A., & Deshmukh, S. G. (2009). Supply chain management for SMEs: A research introduction. Management Research News, 32(10), 970–993. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409170910994178
  69. Tung, R. L., Zander, I., & Fang, T. (2023). The tech cold war, the multipolarization of the world economy, and IB research. International Business Review, 32(6), Article 102195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2023.102195
  70. Ünsal, S., & Gövdere, B. (2023). İşletmelerde çevresel sürdürülebilirliğin sağlanmasında sürdürülebilir ambalaj kullanımının önemi. Uygulamalı Sosyal Bilimler ve Güzel Sanatlar Dergisi, 5(11), 1–15. https://izlik.org/JA54RC38PZ
  71. Vasist, P. N., & Krishnan, S. (2023). Fake news and sustainability-focused innovations: A review of the literature and an agenda for future research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 388, Article 135933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.135933
  72. Vieira, J., Frade, R., Martinho, F., & Martinho, D. (2023). Does uncertainty boost exports? A study on the effect of innovation and marketing capabilities in a small and innovation-intensive sector. Economies, 11(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies11010001
  73. Wildnerova, L., Menon, C., Dehghan, R., Kinne, J., & Lenz, D. (2024). Which SMEs are greening? Cross-country evidence from one million websites (OECD SME and Entrepreneurship Papers No. 60). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/ddd00999-en
  74. Witt, M. A. (2019). De-globalization: Theories, predictions, and opportunities for international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(7), 1053–1077. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-019-00219-7
  75. Witt, M. A., Lewin, A. Y., Li, P. P., & Gaur, A. (2023). Decoupling in international business: Evidence, drivers, impact, and implications for IB research. Journal of World Business, 58(1), Article 101399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2022.101399
  76. World Economic Forum. (2024). The global risks report 2024 (19th ed.). https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_The_Global_Risks_Report_2024.pdf
  77. Yıldız Çankaya, S., & Sezen, B. (2015). Ekolojik yenilik ile sürdürülebilirlik performansı arasındaki ilişkide çevresel belirsizliğin moderatör etkisi. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 11(24), 111–134. https://doi.org/10.17130/ijmeb.2015.11.24.741
  78. Yorgancılar, F. N. (2011). Sürdürülebilir rekabet anlayışı olarak yenilik yeteneği. Sosyal Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 11(21), 379–426. https://izlik.org/JA34ZU47GS
  79. Zahoor, N., Wu, J., Khan, H., & Khan, Z. (2023). De-globalization, international trade protectionism, and the reconfigurations of global value chains. Management International Review, 63(5), 823–859. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-023-00522-4
  80. Zhang, Z., Zhu, H., Zhou, Z., & Zou, K. (2022). How does innovation matter for sustainable performance? Evidence from small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Business Research, 153, 251–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.08.034
  81. Zimon, D., Tyan, J., & Sroufe, R. (2020). Drivers of sustainable supply chain management: Practices to alignment with UN Sustainable Development Goals. International Journal for Quality Research, 14(1), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.24874/IJQR14.01-14