Cilt 13 Sayı 2 (2025): Business & Management Studies: An International Journal
Makaleler

Küreselleşme ve refah devleti: OECD ülkelerinde kamu sosyal harcamalarının ampirik analizi

PDF (İngilizce)
  • Dilara Çakmakoğlu,
  • Ali Tarkan Çavuşoğlu
Dilara Çakmakoğlu
Arş. Görv., Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Üniversitesi, Rize, Türkiye
Ali Tarkan Çavuşoğlu
Prof. Dr., Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara, Türkiye

Yayınlanmış 25.06.2025

Anahtar Kelimeler

  • Globalisation, Public Social Expenditures, Panel Regression, Random Effects
  • Küreselleşme, Kamu Sosyal Harcamaları, Panel Regresyon, Rassal Etkiler

Nasıl Atıf Yapılır

Küreselleşme ve refah devleti: OECD ülkelerinde kamu sosyal harcamalarının ampirik analizi. (2025). Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 13(2), 747-761. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v13i2.2579

Telif Hakkı (c) 2025 Dilara Çakmakoğlu- Ali Tarkan Çavuşoğlu

Creative Commons License

Bu çalışma Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License ile lisanslanmıştır.

Nasıl Atıf Yapılır

Küreselleşme ve refah devleti: OECD ülkelerinde kamu sosyal harcamalarının ampirik analizi. (2025). Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 13(2), 747-761. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v13i2.2579

Öz

Bu çalışma, 2008–2019 döneminde 17 OECD ülkesinde küreselleşmenin genel, ekonomik, ticari ve finansal boyutlarının kamu sosyal harcamaları üzerindeki etkilerini ampirik olarak incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Özellikle ekonomik küreselleşme boyutu ile onun alt bileşenleri olan ticaret ve finansal küreselleşme üzerinde durulmaktadır; zira bu boyutlar, refah politikalarını etkileyen en doğrudan piyasa baskılarını ve ölçülebilir aktarım kanallarını yansıtmaktadır. Analizlerde rassal etkiler panel veri modeli kullanılmış, tanısal testlerle kesitsel bağımlılık, heteroskedastisite ve otokorelasyon tespit edilmiştir. Bu ihlaller, Driscoll-Kraay standart hatalarıyla düzeltilmiştir. Bulgular, küreselleşmenin sosyal harcamaları artırdığını ve bu yönüyle telafi hipotezini desteklediğini göstermektedir. En güçlü etki ekonomik küreselleşmeden kaynaklanmakta olup, özellikle finansal küreselleşme belirleyici rol oynamaktadır. Ayrıca, ekonomik büyüme ve işsizlikle ters yönlü, yönetişim kalitesiyle ise negatif ilişkiler gözlemlenmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlar, küreselleşme karşısında devletlerin sosyal politika araçlarını kullanarak ekonomik güvenliği sağlamaya ve eşitsizlikleri hafifletmeye çalıştığını ortaya koymaktadır.

PDF (İngilizce)

Referanslar

  1. Anderson, E., & Obeng, S. (2021). Globalisation and government spending: Evidence for the "hyper-globalisation" of the 1990s and 2000s. The World Economy, 44(5), 1144–1176.
  2. Atkinson, T. (2002). Globalisation and the European welfare state at the opening and the closing of the twentieth century. In H. Kierzkowski (Ed.), Europe and globalisation (pp. 249–273). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403937674_13
  3. Bowles, P., & Wagman, B. (1997). Globalisation and the welfare state: Four hypotheses and some empirical evidence. Eastern Economic Journal, 23(3), 317-336.
  4. Bradford, S., & Lawrence, R. Z. (2004). Has globalisation gone far enough?: The costs of fragmented markets. Columbia University Press.
  5. Brady, D., Beckfield, J., & Seeleib-Kaiser, M. (2005). Economic globalisation and the welfare state in affluent democracies, 1975-2001. American Sociological Review, 70(6), 921-948. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240507000603
  6. Bretschger, L., & Hettich, F. (2002). Globalisation, capital mobility and tax competition: Theory and evidence for OECD countries. European Journal of Political Economy, 18(4), 695-716. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-2680(02)00115-5
  7. Cameron, D. R. (1978). The expansion of the public economy: A comparative analysis. American Political Science Review, 72(4), 1243–1261. https://doi.org/10.2307/1954537
  8. Castells, M. (1996). The information age: Economy, society and culture. Blackwell.
  9. Dreher, A., Gaston, N., & Martens, P. (2008). Measuring Globalisation: Gauging Its Consequences. Springer).
  10. Einhorn, E. S., & Logue, J. (2010). Can welfare states be sustained in a global economy? lessons from Scandinavia. Political Science Quarterly, 125(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-165X.2010.tb00666.x
  11. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). Three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton University Press.
  12. Evers, A. (1995). Part of the welfare mix: The third sector as an intermediate area. Voluntas, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02353995
  13. Garrett, G. (1998). Partisan politics in the global economy. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625633
  14. Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Polity.
  15. Giuliani, M., & Madama, I. (2025). Unpacking the globalisation-welfare nexus: A meta-analysis of comparative evidence, mechanisms and effects of openness on social spending. Journal of European Social Policy. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/09589287241313431
  16. Gray, J. (1998). False dawn: The delusions of global capitalism. Granta Books.
  17. Greve, B. (2006). The future of the welfare state european and global perspectives. Ashgate.
  18. Gygli, S., Haelg, F., Potrafke, N., & Sturm, J-E. (2019). The KOF globalisation index – revisited, review of international organisations, 14(3), 543-574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-019-09344-2.
  19. Hakeem, S., Ghauri, S.P., Ahmed, R.R., Streimikiene, D., & Streimikis, J. (2023). Development of Social Welfare Policies in the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) Countries: Globalization and Democracy. Social Indicators Research, 167(1-3), 91–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-023-03095-9
  20. Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2000). Empire. Harvard University Press.
  21. Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press.
  22. Heimberger, P. (2021). Does economic globalization affect government spending? A meta-analysis. Public Choice, 187(3-4), 349–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-020-00784-8
  23. Held, D., & McGrew, A. (2007). Globalisation theory: Approaches and controversies. Polity.
  24. Hicks, A. (1999). Social Democracy and welfare capitalism: A century of income security politics. Cornell University Press.
  25. Hirst, P., & Thompson, G. (1999). Globalisation in question: The international economy and the possibilities of governance. Polity Press.
  26. Hoechle, D. (2007). Robust standard errors for panel regressions with cross-sectional dependence. The Stata Journal, 7(3), 281-312.
  27. Huber, E., & Stephens, J. D. (2001). Development and crisis of the welfare state parties and policies in global markets. University of Chicago Press.
  28. Jessop, B. (2002). The future of the capitalist state. Polity.
  29. Katzenstein, P. J. (2006). Small states in world markets: Industrial policy in Europe. Cornell University Press.
  30. Keohane, R. O., & Milner, H. V. (1996). Internationalisation and domestic politics. Cambridge University Press.
  31. Kim, T. K., & Zurlo, K. (2009). How does economic globalisation affect the welfare state? focusing on the mediating effect of welfare regimes. International Journal of Social Welfare, 18(2), 130-141. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2397.2008.00575.x
  32. Kittel, B., & Winner, H. (2005). How reliable is pooled analysis in political economy? The globalisation-welfare state nexus revisited. European Journal of Political Research, 44(2), 269-293. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2005.00228.x
  33. Leibrecht, M., Klien, M., & Onaran, O. (2011). Globalisation, welfare regimes and social protection expenditures in western and eastern european countries. Public Choice, 148(3–4), 569–594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-010-9685-7
  34. Milanovic, Branko. (1998). Income, inequality, and poverty during the transition from planned to market economy. World Bank.
  35. Navarro, V., Schmitt, J., & Astudillo, J. (2004). Is Globalisation undermining the welfare state? Cambridge Journal of Economics, 28(1), 133-152. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/28.1.133
  36. OECD (2024). Social Expenditure Database (SOCX), https://www.oecd.org/en/data/datasets/social-expenditure-database-socx.html (Accessed September 2024).
  37. Onaran, Ö., & Boesch, V. (2014). The effect of globalisation on the distribution of taxes and social expenditures in europe: do welfare state regimes matter? Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 46(2), 373–397. https://doi.org/10.1068/a45370
  38. Özdemir, S. (2007). Küreselleşme sürecinde refah devleti. İTO Yayınları.
  39. Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. Cambridge Working Papers. Economics, 1240(1), 1.
  40. Pierson, P. (1996). The new politics of the welfare state. World Politics, 48(2), 143-179. https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.1996.0004
  41. Potrafke, N. (2019). The globalisation–welfare state nexus: Evidence from Asia. The World Economy, 42(3), 959–974.
  42. Rhodes, M. (1996). Globalisation and west european welfare states: A critical review of recent debates. Journal of European Social Policy, 6(4), 305-327. https://doi.org/10.1177/095892879600600403
  43. Rieger, E., & Leibfried, S. (2003). Limits to globalisation: Welfare states and the world economy. Polity Press.
  44. Robertson, R. (1992). Globalisation: Social theory and global culture. Sage Publications Ltd.
  45. Rodrik, D. (1998a). Why do more open economies have bigger governments? Journal of Political Economy, 106(5), 997–1032. https://doi.org/10.1086/250038
  46. Rodrik, D. (1998b). Has globalisation gone too far? Challenge, 41(2), 81–94.
  47. Rudra, N., & Haggard, S. (2005). Globalisation, democracy and effective welfare spending in the developing world. Comparative Political Studies, 38(9), 1015-1049. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414005279258
  48. Santos, M., & Simões, M. (2021). Globalisation, welfare models and social expenditure in oecd countries. Open Economies Review, 32(5), 1063–1088. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11079-021-09646-2
  49. Scholte, J. A. (2008). Defining globalisation. World Economy, 31(11), 1471–1502. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2007.01019.x
  50. Schwartz, H. (2001). Round up the usual suspects!: Globalisation, domestic politics, and welfare state change. In P. Pierson (Ed.), The new politics of the welfare state (pp. 17–44). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198297564.003.0002
  51. Strange, S. (1996). The retreat of the state. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511559143
  52. Strange, S. (1997). The erosion of the state. Current history: A Journal of Contemporary World Affairs, 613, 365-369.
  53. Teorell, J., Sundström, A., Holmberg, S., Rothstein, B., Pachon, N. A., Dalli, C. M., Valverde, R. L., Phiri, V. S., & Gerber, L. (2025). The quality of government standard dataset, Version Jan25. University of Gothenburg: The Quality of Government Institute, https://www.gu.se/en/quality-government doi:10.18157/qogstdjan25.
  54. Wade, R. (1996). Globalisation and its limits: Reports of the death of the national economy are greatly exaggerated. In S. Berger & R. Dore (Eds.), National diversity and global capitalism (pp. 60–88). Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501722158-004
  55. World Bank (2024). World development indicators, https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators/preview/on (Accessed September 2024)
  56. Wu, W., Zhang, L., Mahalik, M. K., Wan, Q., Gozgor, G., & Lu, Z. (2023). Revisiting the globalisation–welfare state nexus: What about the quality of the social welfare? Economic Research–Ekonomska Istraživanja, 36(3), 2193–2210.
  57. Yay, G. G., & Aksoy, T. (2018). Globalisation and the welfare state. Quality & Quantity, 52(3), 1015–1040. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0501-z