Cilt 11 Sayı 1 (2023): Business & Management Studies: An International Journal
Makaleler

Stratejik yönetim perspektifinden araştırma üniversitelerinin lisansüstü/lisans eğitim performanslarının karşılaştırılması ve etkinlik belirleyicileri: Türkiye örneği

Edib Ali PEHLİVANLI
Dr. Öğr. Üyesi, Aksaray Üniversitesi, Aksaray, Türkiye

Yayınlanmış 2023-03-25

Nasıl Atıf Yapılır

PEHLİVANLI, E. A. (2023). Stratejik yönetim perspektifinden araştırma üniversitelerinin lisansüstü/lisans eğitim performanslarının karşılaştırılması ve etkinlik belirleyicileri: Türkiye örneği. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 11(1), 121–135. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v11i1.2179

Özet

Bu çalışmada, Türkiye'de yerleşik 20 devlet araştırma üniversitesinin 2020 yılı verileri kullanılarak lisans ve lisansüstü eğitim etkinlikleri skorları belirlenmiştir. Lisans ve lisansüstü eğitim etkinliklerinin karşılaştırıldığı çalışmada, girdi odaklı veri zarflama analizi kullanılmıştır. Çalışmada stratejik yönetim bağlamında karar verme birimlerinin önceledikleri alan(lar)daki etkinliklerinin, yoğun faaliyet gösterdikleri alan(lar)daki etkinlikleri ile karşılaştırmasını ve önceledikleri alan(lar)daki etkinliklerini nasıl artırabileceklerine yönelik öneriler içermektedir. Ayrıca çalışmada, etkinlik skorlarının belirleyicilerinin tespit edilmesine yönelik kısıtlı bağımlı değişkenlerde regresyon modeli olan Tobit regresyon modeli kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen bulgular araştırma üniversitelerinin lisans ve lisansüstü performanslarını karşılaştırmalı olarak sunmaktadır. Bununla birlikte Tobit regresyon modelinden elde edilen sonuçlardan yola çıkarak lisansüstü performansın artırılması için önerilerde bulunulmuştur. Beş faktör (öğretim üyesi başına düşen lisansüstü öğrenci sayısı, akademik personel başına düşen lisans öğrenci sayısı, öğrenci ve mezuniyet sayılarında lisansüstü/lisans sayısı ve program başı öğretim üyesi sayısı) lisansüstü performans üzerinde anlamlı etkiye sahiptir. Araştırma üniversitelerinin bu faktörleri göz önünde bulundurarak yeniden yapılandırılması veya bundan sonra yapılacak planlamalarda bunların dikkate alınması stratejik yönetim açısından önemlidir. Çalışma hem eğitim hem de yönetim alanında, performans yönetimine farkı bakış açısı sunmaktadır.

İndirmeler

İndirme verileri henüz mevcut değil.

Referanslar

  1. Abbott, M., & Doucouliagos, C. (2003). The efficiency of Australian universities: a data envelopment analysis. Economics of Education Review, 22(1), 89–97.
  2. Abbott, M., & Doucouliagos, C. (2009). Competition and efficiency: overseas students and technical efficiency in Australian and New Zealand universities. Education Economics, 17(1), 31–57.
  3. Abramo, G., & D’Angelo, C. A. (2009). Assessing technical and cost efficiency of research activities: A case study of the Italian university system. Research Evaluation, 18(1), 61–70.
  4. Agasisti, T., & Bonomi, F. (2014). Benchmarking universities’ efficiency indicators in the presence of internal heterogeneity. Studies in Higher Education, 39(7), 1237–1255.
  5. Agasisti, T., & Dal Bianco, A. (2009). Reforming the university sector: effects on teaching efficiency—evidence from Italy. Higher Education, 57(4), 477–498.
  6. Agasisti, T., Dal Bianco, A., Landoni, P., Sala, A., & Salerno, M. (2011). Evaluating the efficiency of research in academic departments: An empirical analysis in an Italian region. Higher Education Quarterly, 65(3), 267–289.
  7. Agasisti, T., & Pérez-Esparrells, C. (2010). Comparing efficiency in a cross-country perspective: the case of Italian and Spanish state universities. Higher Education, 59(1), 85–103.
  8. Avkiran, N. K. (2001). Investigating technical and scale efficiencies of Australian universities through data envelopment analysis. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 35(1), 57–80.
  9. Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078–1092.
  10. Barra, C., & Zotti, R. (2016a). A directional distance approach applied to higher education: an analysis of teaching‐related output efficiency. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 87(2), 145–173.
  11. Barra, C., & Zotti, R. (2016b). Measuring efficiency in higher education: an empirical study using a bootstrapped data envelopment analysis. International Advances in Economic Research, 22(1), 11–33.
  12. Baysal, M., Alçılar, B., Çerçioğlu, H., & Toklu, B. (2005). Türkiye’deki Devlet Üniversitelerinin 2004 Yili Performanslarinin, Veri Zarflama Analizi Yöntemiyle Belirlenip Buna Göre 2005 Yili Bütçe Tahsislerinin Yapilmasi. Sakarya University Journal of Science, 9(1), 67–73.
  13. Beasley, J. E. (1995). Determining teaching and research efficiencies. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 46(4), 441–452.
  14. Bonaccorsi, A., Daraio, C., & Simar, L. (2006). Advanced indicators of productivity of universitiesAn application of robust nonparametric methods to Italian data. Scientometrics, 66(2), 389–410.
  15. Bowen, H. R. (1980). The Costs of Higher Education: How Much Do Colleges and Universities Spend per Student and How Much Should They Spend?.
  16. Breu, T. M., & Raab, R. L. (1994). Efficiency and perceived quality of the nation’s “top 25” National Universities and National Liberal Arts Colleges: An application of data envelopment analysis to higher education. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 28(1), 33–45.
  17. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Lewin, A. Y., & Seiford, L. M. (1994). Basic DEA Models. Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology, and Applications, 23–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0637-5_2
  18. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444.
  19. Cherchye, L., & Abeele, P. Vanden. (2005). On research efficiency: A micro-analysis of Dutch university research in Economics and Business Management. Research Policy, 34(4), 495–516.
  20. Chu Ng, Y., & Li, S. K. (2000). Measuring the research performance of Chinese higher education institutions: an application of data envelopment analysis. Education Economics, 8(2), 139–156.
  21. Çınar, Y. (2013). Türkiye’de Kamu Üniversitelerinin eğitim-araştırma etkinlikleri ve etkinlik artışında stratejik önceliklerin rolü: Çok-Aktiviteli VZA uygulaması. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 68(2), 27–62.
  22. Coelli, T. J. (1996). Assessing the performance of Australian universities using data envelopment analysis. University of New England, Department of Econometrics.
  23. Çokgezen, M. (2009). Technical efficiencies of faculties of economics in Turkey. Education Economics, 17(1), 81–94.
  24. Edvardsen, D. F., Førsund, F. R., & Kittelsen, S. A. C. (2017). Productivity development of Norwegian institutions of higher education 2004–2013. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 68(4), 399–415.
  25. Fandel, G. (2007). On the performance of universities in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany: Government’s redistribution of funds judged using DEA efficiency measures. European Journal of Operational Research, 176(1), 521–533.
  26. Farrell, M. J. (1957). The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 120(3), 253–290.
  27. Fernández-Santos, Y., & Martínez-Campillo, A. (2015). ¿ Ha mejorado la productividad docente e investigadora de las universidades públicas españolas desde la aprobación de la LOU?: Evidencia a partir del bootstrap: Have the teaching and research productivity of the Spanish public universities improved after the introduction of the LOU?: Evidence from bootstrap. Ministerio de Educación.
  28. Flegg, A.-T., Allen, D. O., Field, K., & Thurlow, T. W. (2004). Measuring the efficiency of British universities: a multi‐period data envelopment analysis. Education Economics, 12(3), 231–249.
  29. Günay, A., & Dulupçu, M. A. (2019). Measurement of financial efficiency and productivity of Turkish Public Universities by using non-parametric methods. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education.
  30. Günay, A., Dulupçu, M. A., & Oruç, K. O. (2017). Türkiye’de Devlet Üniversitelerinin Etkinlik ve Verimlilik Analizi: Veri Zarflama Analizi ve Malmquist Toplam Faktör Verimlilik Endeksi Uygulamaları. Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 17(3), 85–113.
  31. Günay, A., & Haliloğlu, E. Y. (2018). A case study on measuring research efficiency of public universities in Turkey. Üniversite Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(2), 36–42.
  32. Haktanırlar-Ulutaş, B. (2011). assessing the Relative Performance of University departments: teaching vs. Research. İstanbul University Econometrics and Statistics E-Journal, 13, 125–138.
  33. Johnes, G., & Johnes, J. (1993). Measuring the research performance of UK economics departments: an application of data envelopment analysis. Oxford Economic Papers, 332–347.
  34. Johnes, G., & Johnes, J. (2009). Higher education institutions’ costs and efficiency: Taking the decomposition a further step. Economics of Education Review, 28(1), 107–113.
  35. Johnes, J. (2003). Measuring teaching efficiency in higher education: an application of data envelopment analysis to graduates from UK universities 1993.
  36. Johnes, J., & Li, Y. U. (2008). Measuring the research performance of Chinese higher education institutions using data envelopment analysis. China Economic Review, 19(4), 679–696.
  37. Kantabutra, S., & Tang, J. (2010). Efficiency analysis of public universities in Thailand. Tertiary Education and Management, 16(1), 15–33.
  38. Kao, C. (2012). Efficiency decomposition for parallel production systems. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 63(1), 64–71.
  39. Kao, C., & Hung, H.-T. (2008). Efficiency analysis of university departments: An empirical study. Omega, 36(4), 653–664.
  40. Köksal, G., & Nalçaci, B. (2006). The relative efficiency of departments at a Turkish engineering college: A data envelopment analysis. Higher Education, 51(2), 173–189.
  41. Kounetas, K., Anastasiou, A., Mitropoulos, P., & Mitropoulos, I. (2011). Departmental efficiency differences within a Greek university: An application of a DEA and Tobit analysis. International Transactions in Operational Research, 18(5), 545–559.
  42. Kuah, C. T., & Wong, K. Y. (2011). Efficiency assessment of universities through data envelopment analysis. Procedia Computer Science, 3, 499–506.
  43. Kuo, J.-S., & Ho, Y.-C. (2008). The cost efficiency impact of the university operation fund on public universities in Taiwan. Economics of Education Review, 27(5), 603–612.
  44. Kutlar, A., & Babacan, A. (2008). Türkiye’deki kamu üniversitelerinde CCR etkinliği-ölçek etkinliği analizi: DEA tekniği uygulaması. Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 15, 148–172.
  45. Kutlar, A., & Kartal, M. (2004). Cumhuriyet üniversitesinin verimlilik analizi: fakülteler düzeyinde veri zarflama yöntemiyle bir uygulama. Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 8, 49–79.
  46. Lee, B. L. (2011). Efficiency of research performance of Australian universities: A reappraisal using a bootstrap truncated regression approach. Economic Analysis & Policy, 41(3).
  47. Lu, Y.-H., & Chen, K.-H. (2013). Appraising the cost efficiency of higher technological and vocational education institutions in Taiwan using the metafrontier cost-function model. Research in Higher Education, 54(6), 627–663.
  48. Madden, G., Savage, S., & Kemp, S. (1997). Measuring public sector efficiency: A study of economics departments at Australian universities. Education Economics, 5(2), 153–168.
  49. Mammadov, R., & Aypay, A. (2020). Efficiency analysis of research universities in Turkey. International Journal of Educational Development, 75, 102176.
  50. Martín, E. (2006). Efficiency and quality in the current higher education context in Europe: An application of the data envelopment analysis methodology to performance assessment of departments within the University of Zaragoza. Quality in Higher Education, 12(1), 57–79.
  51. Maynard, J. (1970). Some microeconomics of higher education: economies of scale. The University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
  52. Mayston, D. J. (2014). Effectiveness analysis of quality achievements for university departments of economics. Applied Economics, 46(31), 3788–3797.
  53. McDonald, J. F., & Moffitt, R. A. (1980). The Uses of Tobit Analysis. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 62(2), 318–321. https://doi.org/10.2307/1924766
  54. McMillan, M. L., & Chan, W. H. (2006). University efficiency: A comparison and consolidation of results from stochastic and non‐stochastic methods. Education Economics, 14(1), 1–30.
  55. Mikušová, P. (2017). Measuring the efficiency of the Czech public higher education institutions: an application of DEA. Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, 10(2), 58–63.
  56. Mission & Vision | METU - Middle East Technical University. (n.d.). Retrieved December 17, 2022, from https://www.metu.edu.tr/mission-vision
  57. Mojahedian, M. M., Mohammadi, A., Abdollahi, M., Kebriaeezadeh, A., Sharifzadeh, M., Asadzandi, S., & Nikfar, S. (2020). A review on inputs and outputs in determining the efficiency of universities of medical sciences by data envelopment analysis method. Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 34, 42.
  58. Munoz, D. A. (2016). Assessing the research efficiency of higher education institutions in Chile: A data envelopment analysis approach. International Journal of Educational Management, 30(6), 809–825.
  59. Özden, Ü. (2008). Veri zarflama analizi (VZA) ile Türkiye’deki vakıf üniversitelerinin etkinliğinin ölçülmesi. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 37(2), 167–185.
  60. Rhaiem, M. (2017). Measurement and determinants of academic research efficiency: a systematic review of the evidence. Scientometrics, 110(2), 581–615.
  61. Sagarra, M., Mar-Molinero, C., & Agasisti, T. (2017). Exploring the efficiency of Mexican universities: Integrating data envelopment analysis and multidimensional scaling. Omega, 67, 123–133.
  62. Selim, S., & Bursalioglu, S. A. (2013). Analysis of the determinants of universities efficiency in turkey: Application of the data envelopment analysis and panel Tobit model. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 89, 895–900.
  63. Southwick Jr, L. (1969). Cost trends in land grant colleges and universities. Applied Economics, 1(3), 167–182.
  64. Tauer, L. W., Fried, H. O., & Fry, W. E. (2007). Measuring efficiencies of academic departments within a college. Education Economics, 15(4), 473–489.
  65. Thanassoulis, E., Kortelainen, M., Johnes, G., & Johnes, J. (2011). Costs and efficiency of higher education institutions in England: a DEA analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 62(7), 1282–1297.
  66. Tobin, J. (1958). Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 24–36.
  67. Tochkov, K., Nenovsky, N., & Tochkov, K. (2012). University efficiency and public funding for higher education in Bulgaria. Post-Communist Economies, 24(4), 517–534.
  68. Tomkins, C., & Green, R. (1988). An experiment in the use of data envelopment analysis for evaluating the efficiency of UK university departments of accounting. Financial Accountability & Management, 4(2), 147–164.
  69. Ulucan, A. (2011). Measuring the efficiency of Turkish universities using measure-specific data envelopment analysis. Sosyoekonomi, 14(14).
  70. Ustasüleyman, T. (2007). Veri zarflama analizini kullanarak Türkiye’deki devlet üniversitelerinin etkinliğinin ölçümü. Iktisat Isletme ve Finans, 22(259), 24–43.
  71. Verry, D. W., & Layard, P. R. G. (1975). Cost functions for university teaching and research. The Economic Journal, 85(337), 55–74.
  72. Villano, R. A., & Tran, C.-D. T. T. (2018). Performance of private higher education institutions in Vietnam: evidence using DEA-based bootstrap directional distance approach with quasi-fixed inputs. Applied Economics, 50(55), 5966–5978.
  73. Warning, S. (2004). Performance differences in German higher education: Empirical analysis of strategic groups. Review of Industrial Organization, 24(4), 393–408.
  74. Wolszczak-Derlacz, J. (2017). An evaluation and explanation of (in) efficiency in higher education institutions in Europe and the US with the application of two-stage semi-parametric DEA. Research Policy, 46(9), 1595–1605.
  75. Worthington, A. C. (2001). An empirical survey of frontier efficiency measurement techniques in education. Education Economics, 9(3), 245–268.
  76. Worthington, A. C., & Lee, B. L. (2008). Efficiency, technology and productivity change in Australian universities, 1998–2003. Economics of Education Review, 27(3), 285–298.
  77. Yeşilyurt, C. (2009). Türkiye’deki İktisat Bölümlerinin Göreceli Performanslarinin Veri Zarflama Analizi Yöntemiyle Ölçülmesi: KPSS 2007 Verilerine Dayalı Bir Uygulama. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 23(4), 135–147.