Cilt 11 Sayı 1 (2023): Business & Management Studies: An International Journal
Makaleler

Genç tüketicilerin reklama yönelik şüphe düzeyleri nasıl şekilleniyor? Eş anlı kantil regresyon analizi uygulaması

Aslıhan KIYMALIOĞLU
Dr. Öğr. Üyesi, Akdeniz Üniversitesi, Antalya, Türkiye

Yayınlanmış 2023-03-25

Anahtar Kelimeler

  • Reklama Yönelik Şüphe, Eşanlı Kantil Regresyon Analizi, Z Nesli
  • Ad Scepticism, Simultaneous Quantile Regression Analysis, Generation Z

Nasıl Atıf Yapılır

KIYMALIOĞLU, A. (2023). Genç tüketicilerin reklama yönelik şüphe düzeyleri nasıl şekilleniyor? Eş anlı kantil regresyon analizi uygulaması. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 11(1), 66–80. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v11i1.2172

Özet

Reklam, tüketici tutumlarını ve davranışsal niyetleri şekillendiren pazarlama girişimleri için önemli bir ikna aracıdır. Tüketicilerin reklama yönelik tutumlarını belirleyen faktörlerden biri de reklama yönelik şüphedir. Bu nedenle tüketicilerin reklama yönelik şüphe tutumlarının nasıl oluştuğunun anlaşılması önemli ve katkı sağlayıcı niteliktedir. Bu amaçla, sinizm, benlik saygısı ve pazar uzmanlığının reklama yönelik şüphe üzerindeki etkisini modelleyen bir araştırma kurgulanmış ve Z Nesli üyelerinden toplanan 374 veri eş anlı kantil regresyon analizi ile test edilmiştir. Araştırma bulguları reklama yönelik şüphenin farklı kantil düzeyleri için her bir bağımsız değişkenin ne şekilde etkili olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Çalışma iki açıdan orijinal katkı sağlayıcı niteliktedir. Bunlardan ilki, reklama yönelik şüphe üzerindeki etkisi daha önce herhangi bir araştırmada kullanılmamış olan pazar uzmanlığı değişkeninin araştırılması ve bu değişkenin etkisinin ortaya konulmasıyla birlikte reklama yönelik şüphenin nomolojik ağına katkı sağlayan bir bulgunun elde edilmiş olmasıdır. Çalışmanın bir diğer önemli katkısı ise reklama yönelik şüphenin farklı düzeyleri için bağımsız değişkenlerin etkilerinin detaylı bir şekilde ortaya konulmasıdır.

İndirmeler

İndirme verileri henüz mevcut değil.

Referanslar

  1. Ameen, N., Cheah, J., & Kumar, S. (2022). It’s all part of the customer journey: The impact of augmented reality, chatbots, and social media on the body image and self‐esteem of Generation Z female consumers. Psychology & Marketing, 39(11), 2110–2129.
  2. Amyx, D. A., & Lumpkin, J. R. (2016). Interaction effect of ad puffery and ad scepticism on consumer persuasion. Journal of Promotion Management, 22(3), 403–424. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1080/10496491.2016.1154920
  3. Bae, M. (2018). Overcoming scepticism toward cause-related marketing claims: The role of consumers’ attributions and a temporary state of scepticism. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 35(2), 194–207. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-06-2016-1827
  4. Barksdale, H. C., & Darden, W. R. (1972). Consumer attitudes toward marketing and consumerism. Journal of Marketing, 36(4), 28–35.
  5. Bharadwaj, S. (2022). Weight-related teasing as a source of consumer motivation for impulsive purchase intention of weight loss dietary supplements: insights from generation Z. Young Consumers, 23(3), 468–493.
  6. Bi, N. C., & Zhang, R. (2022). “I will buy what my ‘friend’ recommends “: The effects of parasocial relationships, influencer credibility and self-esteem on purchase intentions. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-08-2021-0214
  7. Blascovich, J., & Tomaka, J. (2013). Measures of self-esteem. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & W. S. (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes: Measures of social psychological attitudes. Academic Press.
  8. Boush, D. M., Friestad, M., & Rose, G. M. (1994). Adolescent scepticism toward TV advertising and knowledge of advertiser tactics. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 165–175.
  9. Brosdahl, D. J. C., & Carpenter, J. M. (2011). Shopping orientations of US males: A generational cohort comparison. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 18(6), 548–554. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2011.07.005
  10. Calfee, J. E., & Ringold, D. J. (1994). The 70% majority: Enduring consumer beliefs about advertising. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 13(2), 228–238.
  11. Campbell, M. C., & Kirmani, A. (2000). Consumers’ use of persuasion knowledge: The effects of accessibility and cognitive capacity on perceptions of an ınfluence agent. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(1), 69–83. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1086/314309
  12. Chari, S., Christodoulides, G., Presi, C., Wenhold, J., & Casaletto, J. P. (2016). Consumer trust in user-generated brand recommendations on Facebook. Psychology & Marketing, 33(12), 1071–1081. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20941
  13. Chelminski, P., & Coulter, R. A. (2007). On market mavens and consumer self-confidence: A cross-cultural study. Psychology and Marketing, 24(1), 69–91. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20153
  14. Chen, F.-P., & Leu, J.-D. (2011). Product ınvolvement in the link between scepticism toward advertising and its effects. Social Behaviour and Personality: An International Journal, 39(2), 153–159. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2011.39.2.153
  15. Chylinski, M., & Chu, A. (2010). Consumer cynicism: Antecedents and consequences. European Journal of Marketing, 44(6), 796–837. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1108/03090561011032720
  16. Cleveland, M., & Bartikowski, B. (2018). Cultural and identity antecedents of market mavenism: Comparing Chinese at home and abroad. Journal of Business Research, 82, 354–363. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.09.012
  17. Consiglio, I., & van Osselaer, S. M. J. (2022). The effects of consumption on self-esteem. Current Opinion in Psychology, 46, 101341. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101341
  18. Dobrinić, D., Gregurec, I., & Dobrinić, D. (2021). Examining the factors of influence on avoiding personalised ads on Facebook. Zbornik Radova Ekonomskog Fakulteta u Rijeci: Časopis Za Ekonomsku Teoriju i Praksu/Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics: Journal of Economics and Business, 39(2), 401–428. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.18045/zbefri.2021.2.401
  19. do Paço, A. M. F., & Reis, R. (2012). Factors affecting skepticism toward green advertising. Journal of Advertising, 41(4), 147-155.
  20. Elliott, M. T., & Warfield, A. E. (1993). Do market mavens categorise brands differently? In L. McAlister & M. L. Rothschild (Eds.), Advances in Consumer Research, volume 20, 202–208. Provo: Association for Consumer Research.
  21. Feick, L. F., & Price, L. L. (1987). The market maven: A diffuser of marketplace information. Journal of Marketing, 51(1), 83–97.
  22. Flynn, L. R., Goldsmith, R. E., & Pollitte, W. (2016). Materialism, status consumption, and market involved consumers. Psychology & Marketing, 33(9), 761–776. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20915
  23. Ford, G. T., Smith, D. B., & Swasy, J. L. (1990). Consumer scepticism of advertising claims: Testing hypothesis from economics of information. Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 433–441.
  24. Forehand, M. R., & Grier, S. (2003). When ıs honesty the best policy? The effect of stated company ıntent on consumer scepticism. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(3), 349–356.
  25. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
  26. Fu, R., & Xu, W. (2021). How social exclusion and high self-esteem negatively affect consumer attitudes toward anthropomorphised products. Social Behaviour and Personality: An International Journal, 49(1), 1–12. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.9604
  27. Gauri, D. K., Harmon-Kizer, T. R., & Talukdar, D. (2016). Antecedents and outcomes of market mavenism: Insights based on survey and purchase data. Journal of Business Research, 69(3), 1053–1060. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.08.018
  28. Goldring, D., & Azab, C. (2021). New rules of social media shopping: Personality differences of U.S. Gen Z versus Gen X market mavens. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 20(4), 884–897. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1893
  29. Goldsmith, R. E., Lafferty, B. A., & Newell, S. J. (2000). The impact of corporate credibility and celebrity credibility on consumer reaction to advertisements and brands. Journal of Advertising, 29(3), 43–54. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2000.10673616
  30. Greenberger, E., Chen, C., Dmitrieva, J., & Farruggia, S. P. (2003). Item-wording and the dimensionality of the Rosenberg self-esteem scale: Do they matter? Personality and Individual Differences, 35(6), 1241–1254. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00331-8
  31. Grow, J. M., & Yang, S. (2018). Generation-Z enters the advertising workplace: Expectations through a gendered lens. Journal of Advertising Education, 22(1), 7–22. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1098048218768595
  32. Hair, J. F. J., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis a global perspective (7th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  33. Hanson, S., Kukar‐Kinney, M., & Yuan, H. (2021). Understanding the impact of recipient identification and discount structure on social coupon sharing: The role of altruism and market mavenism. Psychology & Marketing, 38(11), 2102–2121. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21555
  34. Hao, L., & Naiman, D. Q. (2007). Quantile regression. California: Sage Publications.
  35. Hardesty, D. M., Carlson, J. P., & Bearden, W. (2002). Brand familiarity and invoice price effects on consumer evaluations: The moderating role of scepticism toward advertising. Journal of Advertising, 31(2), 1–15. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2002.10673663
  36. Hourigan, S. R., & Bougoure, U.-S. (2012). Towards a better understanding of fashion clothing involvement. Australasian Marketing Journal, 20(2), 127–135. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2011.10.004
  37. Huang, M.-Y. (2022). Analysing the effects of green building on housing prices: case study of Kaohsiung, Taiwan. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 25(2), 1205-1235.
  38. Huh, J., Delorme, D. E., & Reid, L. N. (2016). A model of consumer response to over-the-counter drug advertising: antecedents and influencing factors. Journal of Health Communication, 21(1), 109–117. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2015.1033116
  39. Hung, W.-T., ShangJui-Kou, & Wang, W.-Ch. (2010). Pricing determinants in the hotel industry: Quantile regression analysis. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 29, 378–384. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2009.09.001
  40. Ju, I. (2017). The effects of advertising scepticism in consumer prescription drug advertising. International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing, 11(4), 395–411. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPHM-10-2016-0054
  41. Kanter, D. L., & Wortzel, L. H. (1985). Cynicism and alienation as marketing considerations: Some new ways to approach the female consumer. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 2(1), 5–15. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1108/eb038816
  42. Katz, R., Ogilvie, S., Shaw, J., & Woodhead, L. (2022). Gen Z, explained: The art of living in a digital age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  43. Kerkhof, P., Fennis, B. M., & van de Meijden, Y. (2004). Consumer-, manufacturer- and ad-related Antecedents of ad scepticism. In P. Neijens, C. Hess, B. van den Putte, & E. Smit (Eds.), International research in advertising (37–50). Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis.
  44. Khan, S., Fazili, A. I., & Bashir, I. (2022). Constructing generational identity through counterfeit luxury consumption. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 31(3), 415–437. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-09-2020-3071
  45. Khuhro, R. A., Khan, A., Humayon, A. A., & Khuhro, A. S. (2017). Ad scepticisms: Antecedents and consequences. Management Science Letters, 23–34. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2016.11.005
  46. Koenker, R. (2005). Quantile regression (Econometric Society Monographs). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  47. Koenker, R., & Bassett, G. (1978). Regression quantiles. Econometrica, 46(1), 33–50.
  48. Koslow, S. (2000). Can the truth hurt? How honest and persuasive advertising can unintentionally lead to increased consumer scepticism. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 34(2), 245–267.
  49. Lin, B., & Benjamin, N. I. (2017). Influencing factors on carbon emissions in China transport industry. A new evidence from quantile regression analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 150, 175–187. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.171
  50. Majláth, M. (2017). The effect of greenwashing information on ad evaluation. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 6(3). Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2017.v6n3p92
  51. Mangleburg, T. F., & Bristol, T. (1998). Socialisation and adolescents’ Scepticism toward advertising. Journal of Advertising, 27(3), 11–21.
  52. Matthes, J., & Wonneberger, A. (2014). The skeptical green consumer revisited: Testing the relationship between green consumerism and scepticism toward advertising. Journal of Advertising, 43(2), 115–127. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2013.834804
  53. Mert, Mehmet. (2016). SPSS STATA yatay kesit veri analizi bilgisayar uygulamaları. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.
  54. Mohr, L. A., Eroğlu, D., & Ellen, P. S. (1998). The development and testing of a measure of scepticism toward environmental claims in marketers’ communications. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 32(1), 30–55.
  55. Noel, C. R. C., Peñafort, J. V., & Larios-Gómez, E. (2021). Consumer fitness market perspectives on women of the Z generation. CPMark-Caderno Profissional de Marketing, 2, 3–34.
  56. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  57. Obermiller, C., Spangenberg, E., & MacLachlan, D. L. (2005). Ad scepticism: The consequences of disbelief. Journal of Advertising, 34(3), 7–17. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2005.10639199
  58. Obermiller, C., & Spangenberg, E. R. (1998). Development of a scale to measure consumer scepticism toward advertising. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7(2), 159–186.
  59. Obermiller, C., & Spangenberg, E. R. (2000). On the origin and distinctness of scepticism toward advertising. Marketing Letters, 11(4), 311–322.
  60. Press, T. D. (2014). Generational focus. Retrieved from: http://dingley.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Generation-White-Paper.pdf
  61. Puiu, S. (2016). Generation Z--a new type of consumers. Young Economists Journal, 13(27), 67–78.
  62. Putrevu, S., & Lord, K. R. (1994). Comparative and noncomparative advertising: Attitudinal effects under cognitive and affective involvement conditions. Journal of Advertising, 23(2), 77–91. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1994.10673443
  63. Read, G. L., van Driel, I. I., & Potter, R. F. (2018). Same-sex couples in advertisements: An investigation of the role of implicit attitudes on cognitive processing and evaluation. Journal of Advertising, 47(2), 182–197. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2018.1452653
  64. Reinecke Flynn, L., & Goldsmith, R. E. (2017). Filling some gaps in market mavenism research. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 16(2), 121–129. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1623
  65. Rosenberg, M., Schooler, C., Schoenbach, C., & Rosenberg, F. (1995). Global self-esteem and specific self-esteem: Different concepts, different outcomes. American Sociological Review, 60(1), 141–156.
  66. Rubio, N., Villaseñor, N., & Oubiña, J. (2015). Consumer identification with store brands: Differences between consumers according to their brand loyalty. Business Research Quarterly, 18(2), 111–126. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2014.03.004
  67. Ruvio, A., & Shoham, A. (2007). Innovativeness, exploratory behaviour , market mavenship, and opinion leadership: An empirical examination in the Asian context. Psychology and Marketing, 24(8), 703–722. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20180
  68. Singh, S., Kristensen, L., & Villaseñor, E. (2009). Overcoming scepticism towards cause related claims: the case of Norway. International Marketing Review, 26(3), 312–326. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1108/02651330910960807
  69. Sjabadhyni, B., Dwi Mustika, M., Carissa, N., Khairunnisa, S., Kurniawan, L. A., Mutiara, A. B., Sinaga, A. P. (2021). The role of need for cognition in predicting the attitudes of Indonesian millennials toward printed advertising and purchase intentions. SAGE Open, 11(3), 215824402110299. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211029918
  70. Tan, S., & Tan, K. (2007). Antecedents and consequences of scepticism toward health claims: An empirical investigation of Singaporean consumers. Journal of Marketing Communications, 13(1), 59–82. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1080/13527260600963711
  71. Thakor, M. V., & Goneau-Lessard, K. (2009). Development of a scale to measure scepticism of social advertising among adolescents. Journal of Business Research, 62(12), 1342–1349. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.10.023
  72. Tsai, M.-H., Chi, S.-C. S., & Hu, H.-H. (2009). Salespeople’s renqing orientation, self-esteem, and selling behaviours: An empirical study in Taiwan. Journal of Business and Psychology, 24(2), 193–200. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-009-9099-z
  73. Ustaahmetoğlu, E., Öztürk Küçük, H., & Toklu, İ. T. (2022). The evaluation of the generation Z responses to message sidedness of junk food ads: The role of health consciousness, persuasiveness, and scepticism. In A. N. Özker & M. E. Atukalp (Eds.), Interpretive research: Economics and administration sciences. Lyon: Livre de Lyon.
  74. Zellner, A., & Theil, H. (1992). Three-stage least squares: Simultaneous estimation of simultaneous equations. In B. Raj & J. Koerts (Eds.), Advanced studies in theoretical and applied econometrics. Springer. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2546-8_10
  75. Zhang, J., & Lee, W.-N. (2014). Exploring the impact of self-interests on market mavenism and e-mavenism: A Chinese Story. Journal of Internet Commerce, 13(3–4), 194–210. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1080/15332861.2014.949215