Cost-benefit analysis of ergonomics-sustainability projects with analytic hierarchy process
- Cost-Benefit Analysis, Analytic Hierarchy Process, Project Evaluation
- Fayda-Maliyet Analizi, Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci, Proje Değerlendirme
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2022 Hüseyin YENER
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Today, sustainability gets a top priority on the agenda of the shortage of natural resources and regulations. Managers seek how to give minimum damage to the environment while keeping productivity. Ergonomics has an answer to trying to smooth the relationships between man and the elements of a system to optimize the whole system's performance and human satisfaction. Ergonomics and sustainability have common areas of interest in putting a man into the centre. Managers always seek ways to improve productivity but investing in employee wellness is often ignored. They are hesitant to fund projects like ergonomics and environmental until savings are proven. The proposed model in this study using Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) together may convince the decision makers to approve the ergonomics or environmental projects easily, which are seen as a pure expense at first.
- Aksoy, Ç. (2013). Scale Recommendations and Implementation of Sustainability in Business in Turkey to Evaluate Performance, (Ph. D. Thesis). Istanbul, Marmara University Social Sciences Institute, https://katalog.marmara.edu.tr/eyayin/tez/eTez023847.pdf.
- Darnall R. & Preston M.J., (2012). Project management: from simple to complex, v. 1.1. Flatworld Knowledge Publishing. ISBN-13: 978-1453352441.
- David R., Ngulube P., & Dube A. (2013). A cost-benefit analysis of document management strategies used at a financial institution in Zimbabwe: A case study, South-African Journal of Information Management, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v15i2.540.
- Frechtling, J. (2002). The 2002 User-Friendly Handbook for Project Evaluation. Division of Research, Evaluation and Communication National Science Foundation. https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2002/nsf02057/nsf02057.pdf
- Johnston, P., Everard, M., Santillo, D., & Robèrt, K. H. (2007). Reclaiming the definition of sustainability. Environmental science and pollution research international, 14(1), 60–66. https://doi.org/10.1065/espr2007.01.375
- Haslam, R., & Waterson, P. (2013). Ergonomics and Sustainability. Ergonomics, 56(3), 343-347, https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2013.786555.
- Hendrick, H.W. (2003). Determining the cost-benefits of ergonomics projects and factors that lead to their success, Applied Ergonomics, 34, 419-427, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-6870(03)00062-0.
- Hendrick, H.W. (1997). Good ergonomics is good economics, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica. https://www.hfes.org/Portals/0/Documents/Hendrick.pdf
- IEA., International Ergonomics Association. (2020). Human Factors/Ergonomics (HF/E). https://iea.cc/what-is-ergonomics/.
- Jayawickrama, H.M.M.M., Kulatunga, A.K., & Mathavan, S. (2016). Fuzzy AHP based Plant Sustainability Evaluation Method, 14th Global Conference on Sustainable Manufacturing, GCSM 3-5 October 2016, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
- Goggins, R. W., Spielholz, P., & Nothstein, G. L. (2008). Estimating the effectiveness of ergonomics interventions through case studies: implications for predictive cost-benefit analysis. Journal of safety research, 39(3), 339–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2007.12.006
- Mani.V., Rajat A., & Vinay S. (2014). Supplier selection using social sustainability: AHP based approach in India, International Strategic Management Review 2, 98–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ism.2014.10.003
- Mommoh, J. (2018). Energy processing and smart grid, Wiley-IEEE Press, 978-1-119-37623-1 (ISBN), 386.
- Mu, E. & Pereyra-Rojas, M. (2016). Practical decision making an introduction to the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) using super Decisions v2, SpringerBriefs in Operations Research., 7-8., 2016.
- Pavlovic-Veselinovic, S. (2014). Ergonomics as a missing part of sustainability. Work, 49(3), 395–399. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-141875
- Saaty, T. & Luis G. V. (2012). Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, SpringerBriefs in Operations Research, Volume 175, 2. Edition, ISBN 978-1-4614-3596-9.
- Saaty, T & Luis, G. V. (2001). The Seven Pillars of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. In: Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 34. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1665-1_2.
- Saaty, T. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York., 1980.
- Soderqvist, T., Brinkhoff, P., Norberg, T., Rosen, L., Back, P., & Norrman, J. (2015), Cost-benefit analysis as a part of sustainability assessment of remediation alternatives for contaminated lands, Journal of Environmental Management, 157, 267-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.04.024
- Taha, Z., Abdul Salaam, H., Sin Ye, P., Tuan Ya, T. M. Y. S., & Mohamad, M. R. (2014). Application of Integrated Sustainability Assessment: Case Study of a Screw Design, International Journal of Industrial Engineering, 22(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.23055/ijietap.2015.22.1.1224
- Waris, M., Panigrahi, S., Mengal, A., Soomro, M.I., Mirjat, N.H., Ullah, M., Azlan, Z.S., & Khan, A. (2019). An Application of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for Sustainable Procurement of Construction Equipment: Multicriteria-Based Decision Framework for Malaysia, Hindawi Mathematical Problems in Engineering Volume, Article ID 6391431, 20 pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6391431
- Zavitz, B. (2019). Demystifying cost justification for ergonomics solutions, Institute of industrial and system engineers, https://www.iise.org/details.aspx?id=45628.