Cilt 10 Sayı 3 (2022): Business & Management Studies: An International Journal
Makaleler

Küreselleşmenin enerji tüketimi üzerindeki etkisi: EAGLEs ülkelerinden kanıtlar

Vildan YAVUZ
Dr. Öğr. Üyesi, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Üniversitesi, Rize, Türkiye
Ali ALTINER
Doç. Dr., Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Üniversitesi, Rize, Türkiye
Eda BOZKURT
Doç. Dr., Atatürk Üniversitesi, Erzurum, Türkiye

Yayınlanmış 2022-09-25

Anahtar Kelimeler

  • Ekonomik Büyüme, Enerji Tüketimi, Küreselleşme, Panel Veri Analizi
  • Economic Growth, Energy Consumption, Globalization, Panel Data Analysis

Nasıl Atıf Yapılır

YAVUZ, V., ALTINER, A., & BOZKURT, E. (2022). Küreselleşmenin enerji tüketimi üzerindeki etkisi: EAGLEs ülkelerinden kanıtlar. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 10(3), 885–894. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v10i3.2081

Özet

Enerji, ülkelerin ekonomik ve sosyal gelişmelerini sağlamaları bakımından üretim sürecinin önemli girdilerinden biri olarak görülmektedir. Son yıllarda ülkeler arasında artan ekonomik entegrasyona bağlı olarak küreselleşme ile enerji tüketimi arasındaki ilişki sıklıkla tartışılmaktadır. Bu konudaki tartışmalara katkı sağlamak amacıyla bu çalışmada küreselleşme sürecinin enerji tüketimine olan etkisi araştırılmıştır. Küreselleşmenin yanında ekonomik büyüme, kentleşme ve kamu harcamalarındaki değişimin de enerji tüketimi üzerindeki etkisi belirlenmeye çalışılmıştır. Bu kapsamda EAGLEs (Yükselen ve Büyümede Öncü Ekonomiler) olarak adlandırılan 9 ülkeye ait yıllık veriler kullanılarak 1990-2019 dönemi için panel veri analizi yapılmıştır.  Analiz çerçevesinde, ilk olarak yatay kesit bağımlılığı ve Pesaran (2007)’nin CADF (Cross Sectional Dickey-Fuller) birim kök testleri uygulanmıştır. Daha sonra tesadüfi etkiler modeliyle katsayı tahminleri yapılmıştır. Elde edilen bulgular küreselleşme düzeyindeki artışın enerji tüketimini arttırdığını göstermiştir. Ayrıca kontrol değişken niteliğinde modele dahil edilen ekonomik büyümenin de enerji tüketimini arttırıcı etkilerde bulunduğu tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca enerji tüketiminde kentleşmedeki artışın azaltıcı etkilerinin olduğu fakat kamu harcamalarındaki değişimin bir etkisinin olmadığı görülmüştür.

İndirmeler

İndirme verileri henüz mevcut değil.

Referanslar

  1. Acheampong, Alex O., Boateng, Elliot, Amponsah, Mary and Dzator, Janet (2021), “Revisiting the Economic Growth–Energy Consumption Nexus: Does Globalization Matter?”, Energy Economics, 102, 105472.
  2. Ahmad, A. and Babar, M. (2013), “Effect of energy market globalization over power sector of GCC region: A short review”, 4, 265-271.
  3. Ajmi, Ahdi Noomen and Akadiri, Seyi Saint (2021), “Energy Consumption, Economic Growth, Foreign Direct Investment and Globalization Causality Nexus in OECD Countries: A Symbolic Transfer Entropy Analysis”, Economics and Business Letters, 10(4), 408-415.
  4. Akadiri, Seyi Saint and Ajmi, Ahdi Noomen (2020), “Causality Relationship between Energy Consumption, Economic Growth, FDI, and Globalization in SSA Countries: A Symbolic Transfer Entropy Analysis”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 44623-44628.
  5. Badea, C. G., Angheluță, P. S. and Partal, C. M. (2017). Energy In The Context Of Globalization. Quality-Access to Success, 18, 40-45.
  6. Breusch, T. S. and Pagan, A. R. (1980), “The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics”, The Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 239-253.
  7. Danish, Khan, Saud, Shah, Baloch, Muhammed Awais and Lodhi, Rab Nawaz (2018), “The Nexus between Energy Consumption and Financial Development: Estimating the role of Globalization in Next-11 Countries”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25, 18651–18661.
  8. Dogan, Buhari and Deger, Osman (2016), “How Globalization and Economic Growth Affect Energy Consumption: Panel Data Analysis in the Sample of Brazil, Russia, India, China Countries”, International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 6(4), 806-813.
  9. Emirmahmutoglu, Furkan ve Kose, Nezir (2011), “Testing For Granger Causality in Heterogeneous Mixed Panels”, Economic Modelling, 28(3), s.870–876.
  10. Fahimi, A., Olasehinde‐Williams, Godwin and Akadiri, Seyi Saint (2021), “Examining the causal relationship between globalization and energy consumption in MINT countries: Evidence from bootstrap panel granger causality”, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 26(2), 1886-1896.
  11. Godil, Danish Iqbal, Sharif, Arshian, Ali, Muhammed Iftikhar, Ozturk, Ilhan and Usman, Rimsha (2021), “The Role of Financial Development, R&D Expenditure, Globalization and Institutional Quality in Energy Consumption in India: New Evidence from the QARDL Approach”, Journal of Environmental Management, 285, 112208.
  12. Gozgor, Giray, Mahalik, Kumar Mantu, Demir, Ender and Hemachandra, Padhan (2020), “The Impact of Economic Globalization on Renewable Energy in the OECD Countries”, Energy Policy, 139, 111365.
  13. Hossain, Md. Roni, Mustafa, Samirah and Rayhan, Istihak (2019), “Exploring the Dynamic Causality between Globalization and Energy Consumption in Bangladesh: An Empirical Analysis”, The Jahangirnagar Economic Review, 30, 59-70.
  14. Huang, Zhilin, Zhang, Hong and Duan, Hongbo (2020), “How will Globalization Contribute to Reduce Energy Consumption?”, Energy, 213, 118825.
  15. Lu, Jie, Imran, Muhammad, Haseeb, Abdul, Saud, Shah, Wu, Mengyun, Siddiqui, Faiza and Khan, Muhammad Jalal (2021), “Nexus Between Financial Development, FDI, Globalization, Energy Consumption and Environment: Evidence From BRI Countries”, Frontiers in Energy Research, 9, 707590.
  16. Narin, M. and Kutluay, D. (2013), “Değişen Küresel Ekonomik Düzen: BRIC, 3G ve N-11 Ülkeleri”, Ankara Sanayi Odası Yayın Organı, Ocak/Şubat 2013, 30-50.
  17. Padhan, Hemanchandra, Padhang, Purna Chandra, Tiwari, Aviral Kumar, Ahmed, Rizwan and Hammoudeh, Shawkat (2020), “Renewable Energy Consumption and Robust Globalization(s) in OECD Countries: Do oil, carbon emissions, and economic activity matter?” Energy Strategy Reviews, 32.
  18. Pesaran, M. H. (2007), “A Simple Panel Unit Root Test in The Presence Of Cross‐Section Dependence”, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265–312.
  19. Pesaran, M. H., Ullah, A. and Yamagata, T. (2008), “A Bias‐Adjusted LM Test Of Error Cross‐Section Independence”, The Econometrics Journal, 11(1), 105–127.
  20. Pesaran, M. H. (2004), “General Diagnostic Test for Cross Section Dependence in Panels”, Cambridge Working Papers in Economics, 0435, 1–39.
  21. Rashed, Fayrouz and Eren, Mehmet Vahit (2021), “Türkiye’de Küreselleşme ve Enerji Tüketimi Arasındaki İlişki: Frekans Dağılımı Nedensellik Analizi”, Fiscaoeconomia, 5 (2), 556-578.
  22. Saud, Shah, Danish, Khan and Chen, Songsheng (2018), “An Empirical Analysis of Financial Development and Energy Demand: Establishing the Role of Globalization”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25, 24326-24337.
  23. Shahbaz, Muhammed, Shahzad, Syed Jawad Hussain, Mahalik, Mantu Kumar and Sadorsky, Perry (2018a), “How Strong is the Causal Relationship between Globalization and Energy Consumption in Developed Economies? A Country-Specific Time-Series and Panel Analysis”, Applied Economics, 50(13), 1479-1494.
  24. Shahbaz, Muhammed, Lahiani, Amine, Abosedra, Salah and Hammoudeh, Shawkat (2018b), “The Role Of Globalization in Energy Consumption: A Quantile Cointegrating Regression Approach”, Energy Economics, 71, 161–170.
  25. Shahbaz, Muhammed, Mahalik, Mantu Kumar, Shahzad, Syed Jawad Hussai,n and Hammoudeh, Shawkat (2018c), “Does the Environmental Kuznets Curve Exist between Globalization and Energy Consumption? Global Evidence From The Cross‐Correlation Method”, Int J Fin Econ., 1–18.
  26. Shahbaz, Muhammed, Balcilar, Mehmet Mahalik, Mantu Kumar and Akadiri, Seyi (2021), “Is Causality between Globalization and Energy Consumption Bidirectional or Unidirectional in top and Bottom Globalized Economies?”, Int J Fin Econ., 1–26.
  27. Urom, Christian, Abid, Ilyes, Guesmi, Khaled and Ndubuisi, Gideon (2022), “Renewable Energy Consumption, Globalization, and Economic Growth Shocks: Evidence from G7 Countries”, The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 31(2), 204-232.