Vol. 8 No. 4 (2020): Business & Management Studies: An International Journal


Asst. Prof., Erciyes University

Published 2020-12-10


  • Ahlaki Karar Verme, Çevrecilik, Planlanmış Davranış Kuramı
  • Ethical Decision Making, Environmentalism, Theory of Planned Behaviour

How to Cite

COŞKUN, A. (2020). ENVIRONMENTALISM AND ETHICAL DECISION MAKING IN BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 8(4), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v8i4.1703


This study tries to reveal the dynamics of ethical business decision making process about environmental issues, in terms of Theory of planned behaviour framework. To do so, a survey analysis was held with 167 university students by taking an online questionnaire and the data were statistically analysed by using a statistic software
(SPSS). Results showed that ethical behaviour intentions have significant positive relationships with environmentalism, ethical attitudes toward environment and perceived behavioural control. Demographic factor groups were found to have no significant differences in any of the variables.


Download data is not yet available.


  1. Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to action: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmenn (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11–39). New York: Springer.
  2. Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
  3. Aytaç, M. & Öngen, B. (2012). Doğrulayıcı faktör analizi ile yeni çevresel paradigma ölçeğinin yapı geçerliliğinin incelenmesi. İstatistikçiler Dergisi, 5, 14-22.
  4. Banerjee, S. B. (2002). Corporate environmentalism: The construct and its measurement. Journal of business research, 55(3), 177-91.
  5. Bechtel, R. B., Verdugo, V. C., & de Queiroz Pinheiro, J. (1999). Environmental belief systems: United States, Brazil, and Mexico. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30(1), 122-28.
  6. de Anguita, P. M., Alonso, E., & Martin, M. A. (2008). Environmental economic, political and ethical integration in a common decision-making framework. Journal of environmental management, 88(1), 154-64.
  7. Dubinsky, A. J., & Loken, B. (1989). Analyzing ethical decision making in marketing. Journal of Business Research, 19(2), 83-107.
  8. Dunlap, R. E. (1980). Paradigmatic change in social science: from human exemptions to an ecological paradigm. American Behavioral Scientist, 24(1), 5-14.
  9. Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000). New trends in measuring environmental attitudes: measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: a revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 425-42.
  10. Erdoğan, N. (2009), Testing the new ecological paradigm scale: Turkish case. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 4(10), 1023–31.
  11. Ferrell, O. C., & Gresham, L. G. (1985). A contingency framework for understanding ethical decision making in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 49(3), 87-96.
  12. Flannery, B. L., & May, D. R. (2000). Environmental ethical decision making in the US metal-finishing industry. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 642-62.
  13. Gillian, C. (1993). In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  14. Graham, J. W. (1986). Principled organizational dissent: A theoretical essay. Research in Organizational Behavior, 8, 1–52.
  15. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th Ed.), Pearson.
  16. Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243-48.
  17. Harmes, A. (2011). The limits of carbon disclosure: theorizing the business case for investor environmentalism. Global Environmental Politics, 11(2), 98-119.
  18. Hunt, S. D. & Vitell S. M. (1986). A general theory of marketing ethics. Journal of Macromarketing, 6, 5-15.
  19. Işildar, G. Y. (2008). Meslek yüksekokullari boyutunda "çevre eğitimi"nin çevreci yaklaşımlar ve davranışlar üzerindeki etkilerinin değerlendirilmesi. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(4), 759-778.
  20. İnal, S. K. M. E., & İnal, M. E. (2010). Yüksek öğretimde çevre eğitimi alan ve almayan öğrencilerde çevre bilinci: Niğde Üniversitesi örneği. Niğde Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(2), 70-83.
  21. Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue- contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 366-95.
  22. Kohlberg, L. (1981). Essays in Moral Development: The Philosophy of Moral Development (Vol. 1). New York: Harper and Row.
  23. Kopnina, H. (2014). If a tree falls: business students' reflections on environmentalism. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 8(3), 311-29.
  24. O'Fallon, M. J., & Butterfield, K. D. (2005). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 1996–2003. Journal of Business Ethics, 59(4), 375-413.
  25. Porter, M. & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating Shared Value. Harvard Business Review, January-February, 1-17.
  26. Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory. New York: Praeger.
  27. Rutledge, R. W., & Karim, K. E. (1999). The influence of self-interest and ethical considerations on managers' evaluation judgments. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 24(2), 173-84.
  28. Strasser, K. A. (2011). Myths and Realities of Business Environmentalism: Good Works, Good Business or Greenwash?. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  29. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013) Using Multivariate Statistics (6th ed.) Boston: Pearson.
  30. Thapa, B. (1999). Environmentalism: The relation of environmental attitudes and environmentally responsible behaviors among undergraduate students. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 19(5), 426–38.
  31. Trevino, L. K. (1986) Ethical decision making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 601-17.
  32. White, L. (1967). The historical roots of our ecologic crisis. Science, 155(3767), 1203-07.