Vol. 8 No. 4 (2020): Business & Management Studies: An International Journal


Assoc. Prof. Dr., Artvin Çoruh University, Hopa F.E.A.S., Business Administrative Dept

Published 2020-12-10


  • Paternalistic leadership,
  • Management innovation,
  • Psychological ownership,
  • Creativity performance
  • Babacan Liderlik, Yönetim Inovasyonu, Psikolojik Sahiplenme, Yaratıcı Performans

How to Cite

SÖZBİLİR, F. (2020). FACTORS AFFECTING INDIVIDUALS’ CREATIVITY PERFORMANCE: PATERNALIST LEADERSHIP, MANAGEMENT INNOVATION AND PSYCHOLOGICAL OWNERSHIP. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 8(4), 929–954. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v8i4.1606


Paternalistic leadership, management innovation, psychological ownership and creativity performance are the most important approaches for organisations to gain a competitive advantage. This study aims to examine the impact of paternalistic leadership, management innovation, and psychological ownership on creativity performance. Besides, it aimed to provide recommendations based on results regarding the impact of paternalistic leadership and management innovation on psychological ownership and creativity performance. In this empirical study, the data on perceptions concerning paternalistic leadership, management innovation, psychological ownership, and creativity performance were gathered using a questionnaire completed by 119 school vice-principals and 94 school principals, all employed in schools in Artvin, Turkey. The data were analysed with the SmartPLS software and presented in seven tables. The findings showed that management innovation and psychological ownership have a positive impact on creativity performance. The results also revealed that paternalistic leadership has a significant impact on management innovation and psychological ownership. However, it is determined that paternalistic leadership does not have a significant impact on creativity performance.


Download data is not yet available.


  1. Amabile, T.M. (1988). A Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organisations. Research in Organisational Behavior, 10, 123-167
  2. Ansari, M. A., Ahmad, Z. A., & Aafaqi, R. (2004). Organisational leadership in the Malaysian context. In D. Tjosvold & K. Leung (Eds.), Leading in high growth Asia: Managing relationship for teamwork and change (pp. 109-138). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co.
  3. Anwar, H. (2013). Impact of paternalistic leadership on employees' outcome a study on the banking sector of Pakistan. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 7(6), 109-115.
  4. Avey, J. B., Avolio, B. J., Crossley, C. R., & Luthans, F. (2009). Psychological ownership: Theoretical extensions, measurement, and relation to work outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(2), 173-191. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.583
  5. Avey, J. B., Wernsing, T. S., & Palanski, M. E. (2012). Exploring the process of ethical leadership: The mediating role of employee voice and psychological ownership. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(1), 21-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1298-2.
  6. Aycan, Z. (2006). Paternalism: Towards Conceptual Refinement and Operationalisation. In U. Kim, K.-S. Yang, & K.-K. Hwang (Eds.), Indigenous and cultural psychology: Understanding people in context (p. 445–466). Springer Science + Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28662-4_20
  7. Aycan, Z., Kanungo, R. N., Mendonca, M., Yu, K., Deller, J., Stahl, G., & Kurshid, A. (2000). Impact of culture on human resource management practices: A 10-country comparison. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49(1), 192-221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00010
  8. Baryniene, J. & Dauknyte, B. (2015). Creativity as the main factor for organisations' success: Theoretical approach. European Integration Studies, 9, 235-243. http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.eis.0.9.12810
  9. Bernhard, F., & O'Driscoll, M. P. (2011). Psychological ownership in small family-owned businesses: Leadership style and nonfamily-employees' work attitudes and behaviors. Group and Organization Management, 36(3), 345-384. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601111402684
  10. Birkinshaw, J., Hamel, G., & Mol, M. J. (2008). Management innovation. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 825-845.
  11. Camisón, C., & Villar-López, A. (2014). Organisational innovation as an enabler of technological innovation capabilities and firm performance. Journal of Business Research, 67, 2891–2902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.06.004
  12. Chang, S.C, Tein, S.W. & Lee, H.M. (2010). Social capital, creativity, and new product advantage: an empirical study. International Journal of Electronic Business Management, 8(1), 43-55.
  13. Cheng, B.S., Boer, D., Chou, L. F., Huang, M. P., Yoneyama, S., Shim, D. et al. (2013). Paternalistic leadership in four East Asian Societies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, XX(X), 1-9. DOI: 10.1177/0022022113490070
  14. Chin, W.W. (1989). The partial least square approach forstructural equation modeling. In G.A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern Methods for Business Research (pp. 295-336), Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  15. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Hillsdale, New Jersey.
  16. Daniels, S. R. & Jordan, S. L. (2018). The Effect of Paternalism on Incivility: Exploring Incivility Climate as an Important Boundary Condition. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 26(2), 190-203. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051818795817
  17. Dedahanov, A. T., Lee, D. H., Rhee, J., & Yoon, J. (2016). Entrepreneur's paternalistic leadership style and creativity: The mediating role of employee voice, Management Decision, 54(9), 2310-2324, https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-11-2015-0537
  18. Ding, X., Tang, Y-Y., Tang, R., & Posner, M.I. (2014). Improving creativity performance by short-term meditation. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 10(9), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-10-9
  19. Dinh, J. E., Lord, R. G., Gardner, W. L., Meuser, J. D., Liden, R. C., & Hu, J. (2014). Leadership theory and research in the new millennium: Current theoretical trends and changing perspectives. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 36–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.005
  20. Farh J. L., & Cheng B. S. (2000). A cultural analysis of paternalistic leadership in Chinese organisations. In Li J.T., Tsui A.S., Weldon E. (Eds.), Management and Organisations in the Chinese Context (pp. 84-127), London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  21. Farh, J. L., Cheng, B. S., Chou, L. F., & Chu, X. P. (2006). Authority and benevolence: Employee's responses to paternalistic leadership in China. In A. S. Tsui, Y. Bian, & L. Cheng (Eds.), China's Domestic Private Firms: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Management and Performance (pp. 230-260), Armonk, NY: Sharpe.
  22. Feigenbaum, A.V. & Feigenbaum, D.S. (2005). What quality means today. Sloan Management Review, 46(2), 96.
  23. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, XVIII, 39-50. DOI: 10.2307/3151312
  24. Fu, X., Li, Y., & Si, Y. (2013). The impact of paternalistic leadership on innovation: An integrated model. Nankai Business Review International, 4(1), 9-24, https://doi.org/10.1108/20408741311303850
  25. Geisser, S. (1974). A predictive approach to the random effects model. Biometrika, 61(1), 101-107. DOI: 10.2307/2334290
  26. Gino, F. (2015). How to make employees feel like they own their work. Harvard Business Review, Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2015/12/how-to-make-employees-feel-like-they-own-their-work (26.08.2018).
  27. Griep, Y., Wingate, T., & Brys, C. (2017). Integrating psychological contracts and psychological ownership: The role of employee ıdeologies, organisational culture and organisational citizenship behaviour. In Olckers, C., van Zyl, L., van der Vaart, L. (Eds.), Theoretical orientations and practical applications of psychological ownership (pp.79-101), Vanderbijlpark: Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-70247-6_5
  28. Hair, J. H., Hult, G. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
  29. Hamel, G. & Breen, Bill (2007). The future of management. Harvard Business Press, Boston, USA. ISBN: 9781422102503.
  30. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing, In R. R. Sinkovics, P.N. Ghauri (Eds.) New Challenges to International Marketing (Advances in International Marketing, Volume 20), (pp.277-319), Emerald Group Publishing Limited. doi:10.1108/S1474-7979(2009)0000020014
  31. Karakitapoğlu-Aygün, Z., Gumusluoglu, L., & Scandura, T. A. (2019). How Do Different Faces of Paternalistic Leaders Facilitate or Impair Task and Innovative Performance? Opening the Black Box. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 27(2), 138-152. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051819833380
  32. Kim, U.M. (1994). Significance of paternalism and communalism in the occupational welfare system of Korean firms: A national survey. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. Choi & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and Collectivism: Theory Method, and Applications (pp. 251–266), London: Sage Publications.
  33. Kirk, C. P., McSherry, B. & Swain, S. D. (2015). Investing the self: The effect of nonconscious goals on investor psychological ownership and word-of-mouth intentions. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 58, 186-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2015.04.013
  34. Kraśnicka, T., Głód, W., & Wronka-Pośpiech, M. (2016). Management innovation and its measurement. Journal of Entrepreneurship. Management and Innovation (JEMI), 12(2), 95-122. https://doi.org/10.7341/20161225
  35. Kurt, İ. (2013). A research study on the relationship between paternalistic leadership and employee creative work involvement perceptions. Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Dergisi, 5(1), 321-330.
  36. Lee, W.G., Jeon, Y.H., Kim, J.W., & Jung, C.Y. (2014). Effects of job security and psychological ownership on turnover ıntention and ınnovative behavior of manufacturing employees. Journal of the Korea Safety Management and Science, 16(1), 53-68. https://doi.org/10.12812/ksms.2014.16.1.53
  37. Li, C. R., Li, C. X., & Lin, C. J. (2019). The effect of individual task conflict on employee creativity: A moderated mediation model. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 112-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.11.006
  38. Lin, C. & Zhuang, B. (2014). The impact of paternalistic leadership on management innovation: an integrated model. Studies in Science of Science, 32(4), 1-10.
  39. Lin, W., Ma, J., Zhang, Q., Lin, J. C., & Jiang, F. (2016). How is benevolent leadership linked to employee creativity? The mediating role of leader–member exchange and the moderating role of power distance orientation. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(4), 1099–1115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3314-4.
  40. Lu, L., Li, F., Leung, K., Savani, K., & Morris, M.W. (2017). When can culturally diverse teams be more creative? The role of leaders' benevolent paternalism. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(4), 402-415. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2238
  41. Mete, Y. A. & Serin, H. (2015). Okul yöneticilerinin babacan liderlik davranışı ile öğretmenlerin örgütsel vatandaşlık ve örgütsel sinizm davranışları arasındaki ilişki (In English: Relationship between school administrators’ paternalist leadership behaviours and teachers’ organizational citizenship and organizational cynicism behaviours). HAYEF: Journal of Education, 12(24), 147-159.
  42. Mol, M. J., & Birkinshaw, J. (2006). Against the flow: Reaping the rewards of management innovation. European Business Forum, 27, 24–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.01.001
  43. Mol, M. J., & Birkinshaw, J. (2009). The sources of management innovation: When firms introduce new management practices. Journal of Business Research, 62, 1269–1280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.01.001
  44. Mustafa, M., Martin, L., & Hughes, M. (2016). Psychological ownership, job satisfaction, and middle manager entrepreneurial behavior. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 23(3), 272-287. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051815627360
  45. Nal, M., & Tarım, M. (2017). Sağlık Yöneticilerinin Paternalist (Babacan) Liderlik Davranışlarının Çalışanların İş Doyumu Üzerine Etkisi. Artvin Çoruh Üniversitesi Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 3(2), 117-141. https://doi.org/10.22466/acusbd.341461
  46. Nal, M. (2019). The impact of the paternalist leadership on organisational cynicism: A research in the health sector. Journal of International Health Sciences and Management, 5(9), 44-53.
  47. Nal, M. & Sevim, E. (2019). Paternalist liderliğin iş motivasyonu üzerine etkisi: Sağlık çalışanları üzerinde bir araştırma. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 8(4), 397-410.
  48. Nal, M. & Sevim, E. (2020). The Effect of Paternalist Leadership on Work Engagement: A Research on Health Workers. Journal of International Health Sciences and Management, 6(10): 90-107. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jihsam/issue/53910/652891
  49. Nunally, J. C. & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw Hill.
  50. Özyılmaz, B., & Ataç, L. O. (2019). Paternalist liderlik algısının çalışan sesliliğine etkisi: Gıda sektörü çalışanları üzerine bir araştırma. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Yönetim ve Ekonomi Dergisi, 26(2), 397-410. https://doi.org/10.18657/yonveek.574425
  51. Parks, J.M., Ma, L., & Gallagher, D.G. (2010). Elasticity in the 'rules' of the game: Exploring organisational expedience. Human Relations, 63(5), 701–730. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726709355331
  52. Pasa, S.F., Kabasakal, H. & Bodur, M. (2001). Society, organisations, and leadership in Turkey. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50(4): 559–589. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00073
  53. Pellegrini, E. K.& Scandura, T. A. (2006). Leader–member exchange (LMX), paternalism, and delegation in the Turkish business culture: An empirical investigation. Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 264–279. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400185
  54. Pellegrini, E. K., Scandura, T. A., & Jayaraman, V. (2010). Cross-cultural generalizability of paternalistic leadership: An expansion of leader-member exchange theory. Group & Organization Management 35(4), 391–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601110378456
  55. Pickford, H.C., Joy, G., & Roll, K. (2016). Psychological Ownership effects and applications. Saïd Business School Research Papers, University of Oxford. Retrieved from: http://eureka.sbs.ox.ac.uk/6266/1/2016-32.pdf (09.09.2018).
  56. Pierce, J.L., Kostova, T. & Dirks, K.T. (2001). Toward a theory of psychological ownership in organisations. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 298-310. DOI: 10.2307/259124
  57. Ringle, C.M., Wende, S., & Will, A. (2005), SmartPLS 2.0 (beta), http://www.smartpls.de.
  58. Seppala, E. (2015). To motivate employees, do 3 things well. Harvard Business Review, Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2016/01/to-motivate-employees-do-3-things-ell?referral=03759&cm_vc=rr_item_page.bottom (26.08.2018).
  59. Shukla, A. & Singh, S. (2015). Psychological ownership: scale development and validation in the Indian context. International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, 10(2), 230–251. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJICBM.2015.068172
  60. Stone, M. (1974). Cross-validatorychoice and assessment of statistical predictions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 36(2), 111-147.
  61. Sungur, C., Özer, Ö., Saygılı, M., & Uğurluoğlu, Ö. (2019). Paternalistic leadership, organisational cynicism, and intention to quit one's job in nursing. Hospital Topics, 97(4), 139-147. https://doi: 10.1080/00185868.2019.1614893
  62. Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V. E., Chatelin, Y. M., & Lauro, C. (2005). PLS Path Modelling. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 48(1), 159-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2004.03.005
  63. Thawabieh, F.A., Saleem, M., & Hashim, M.W. (2016). Organisational Creativity and Competitive Advantage: A GCC Perspective. International Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 5(4): 355. doi:10.4172/2162-6359.1000355
  64. Tian, Q. & Sanchez, J. S. (2017). Does paternalistic leadership promote innovative behavior? The interaction between authoritarianism and benevolence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 47(5), 235-246. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12431
  65. Tierney, P. & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. The Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1137-1148. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069429
  66. Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2011). Creative self-efficacy development and creative performance over time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(2), 277-293. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0020952
  67. Uğurluoğlu, O., Aldoğan, E. U., Turgut, M., & Özatkan, Y. (2018). The effect of paternalistic leadership on job performance and intention to leave the job. Journal of Health Management, 20(1), 46-55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972063417747700
  68. Uhl-Bien, M., Tierney, P. S., Graen, G. B. & Wakabayashi, M. (1990). Company Paternalism and the Hidden-Investment Process: Identification of the "Right Type" for Line Managers in Leading Japanese Organisations. Group Organization Management, 15(4), 414–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/105960119001500406
  69. Wang, A. C., & Cheng, B. S. (2010). When does benevolent leadership lead to creativity? The moderating role of creative role identity and job autonomy. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(1), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.634
  70. Wang, G. & Netemeyer, R.G. (2004). Salesperson creative performance: conceptualisation, measurement, and nomological validity. Journal of Business Research, 57, 805-812. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00483-6
  71. Wang, Y., Tang, C., Naumann, S., & Wang, Y. (2017). Paternalistic leadership and employee creativity: A mediated moderation model. Journal of Management & Organization, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2017.8
  72. Wang, S-M., Chou, W-J., Wu, T-Y., & Cheng, B-S. (2018). The Double-edged sword of benevolence: A dual paths model of benevolent leadership and creative performance. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 60(1), 57-79. DOI: 10.6129/CJP.201803_60(1).0003
  73. Wu, Y.S. (2018) The Influence of Paternalistic Leadership on the Creative Behavior of Knowledge Workers-Based on the Perspective of Psychological Contractual Perception. Open Journal of Business and Management, 6, 478-487. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojbm.2018.62036.
  74. Vaccaro, I.G., Jansen, J.J.P, Van Den Bosch, F.A.J., & Volberda, H.W. (2012). Management ınnovation and leadership: The moderating role of organisational size. Journal of Management Studies, 49(1), 28-51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00976.x
  75. Volberda, H.W., Van Den Bosch, F.A.J. & Heij, C.V. (2013). Management Innovation: Management as fertile ground for ınnovation. European Management Review, 10, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12007
  76. Volberda, H.W., Bosch, F.A.J.V.D., & Mihalache, O.R. (2014). Advancing Management Innovation: Synthesising Processes, Levels of Analysis, and Change Agents. Organisation Studies, 35(9) 1245–1264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840614546155
  77. Yeşiltaş, M. (2013). The Effects of Paternalist Leadership on Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Mediating Role of Distributive Justice. Journal of Business Research-Türk, 5(4), 50-70.
  78. Zhou, J. & George, J.M. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 682–696. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069410
  79. Zhu, H., Chen, C. C., Li, X. C., & Zhou, Y. H. (2013). From personal relationship to psychological ownership: The importance of manager–owner relationship closeness in family businesses. Management and Organization Review, 9(2), 295-318. https://doi.org/10.1111/more.12001.