Vol. 8 No. 2 (2020): Business & Management Studies: An International Journal


Prof. Dr., Yıldız Technical University
Res. Asisst., Medipol University
Şirin Gizem KÖSE
Res. Asisst., Yıldız Technical University

Published 2020-06-25


  • Social Media Social Media Communication Ephemeral Social Media Consumer Motivation
  • Sosyal Medya Sosyal Medya İletişimi Geçici İçerik Tüketici Motivasyonu

How to Cite

KIRCOVA, İbrahim, PINARBAŞI, F., & KÖSE, Şirin G. (2020). UNDERSTANDING EPHEMERAL SOCIAL MEDIA THROUGH INSTAGRAM STORIES: A MARKETING PERSPECTIVE. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 8(2), 2173–2192. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v8i2.1452


             Choosing media channels and consuming in digital channels have become crucial subjects  in marketing and communication in the last century. Ephemeral social media, which can be defined as sharing and consuming media content in a short period, has recently become a widespread habit in social media tools. Ephemeral timelines that are a product of this concept has recently increased its importance in digital communication channels. In line with this trend, this study explores consumers’ intention to continue using Instagram Stories, which is a service provided by Instagram and makes it possible to share content that is available for 24 hours only. Regression analyses are conducted to analyze the relationships between model variables, and Chi-square tests are employed to evaluate relationships between intention and personal attributes. As a result, it is found that perceived ephemerality, reliance on graphics and social presence have a positive relationship with the intention to continue using Instagram Stories. The study also assesses related personal attributes for the intention which can be used for academic and managerial implications.


Download data is not yet available.


  1. Abdulbaqi, S. S., Arikewuyo, A. O., & Omisore, O. T. (2017). Post It, Share It, Like It: Motivations behind Wedding Posts on Social Media among Nigerian Youth. International Conference on Communication, Media, Technology and Design (ICCMTD) 66-75.
  2. Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000). Time flies when you’re having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly, 24(4), 665–694.
  3. Ajzen, I. 2002. "Constructing a Tpb Questionnaire: Conceptual and Methodological Considerations." Working Paper: University of Massachusetts.
  4. Animesh, A., Pinsonneault, A., Yang, S. B., & Oh, W. (2011). An odyssey into virtual worlds: exploring the impacts of technological and spatial environments on intention to purchase virtual products. Mis Quarterly, 789-810.
  5. Bardhi, F., & Eckhardt, G. M. (2017). Liquid consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(3), 582-597.
  6. Bayer, J. B., Ellison, N. B., Schoenebeck, S. Y., & Falk, E. B. (2016). Sharing the small moments: ephemeral social interaction on Snapchat. Information, Communication & Society, 19(7), 956–977.
  7. Belanche, D., Cenjor, I., & Pérez-Rueda, A. (2019). Instagram Stories versus Facebook Wall: an advertising effectiveness analysis. Spanish Journal of Marketing-ESIC, 23(1), 69-94
  8. Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351–370.
  9. Billings, A. C., Qiao, F., Conlin, L., & Nie, T. (2017). Permanently desiring the temporary? Snapchat, social media, and the shifting motivations of sports fans. Communication & Sport, 5(1), 10-26.
  10. Cavalcanti, L. H. C., Pinto, A., Brubaker, J. R., & Dombrowski, L. S. (2017, February). Media, meaning, and context loss in ephemeral communication platforms: A qualitative investigation on Snapchat. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work and social computing (pp. 1934-1945).
  11. Chen, K. J., & Cheung, H. L. (2019). Unlocking the power of ephemeral content: The roles of motivations, gratification, need for closure, and engagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 97, 67-74.
  12. Choi, S. (2016). The flipside of ubiquitous connectivity enabled by smartphone-based social networking service: Social presence and privacy concern. Computers İn Human Behavior, 65, 325-333.
  13. Coa, V. V., & Setiawan, J. (2017). Analyzing Factors Influencing Behavior Intention to Use Snapchat and Instagram Stories. International Journal of New Media Technology, 4(2), 75-81.
  14. Çapraz, Y. C. (2018). Sosyal Medya Uygulamalarında Yok Olan Mesaj/Veri Kavramı ve Gençlerin Kullanım Motivasyonları. Galatasaray Üniversitesi İletişim Dergisi, (29), 235-256.
  15. Eginli, A. T., & Tas, N. O. (2018). Interpersonal communication in social networking sites: An investigation in the framework of uses and gratification theory. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 8(2), 81-104.
  16. Heinonen, K. (2011). Consumer activity in social media: Managerial approaches to consumers' social media behavior. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 10(6), 356-364.
  17. Instagram Blog. (2016’a). Instagram Today: 500 Million Windows to the World. Retrieved from http://instagram.tumblr.com/post/146255204757/160621-news. (Last accessed: 12 May 2018).
  18. Instagram Blog. (2016b, August 2). Introducing Instagram Stories. Retrieved from https://instagram-press.com/blog/2016/08/02/introducing-instagram-stories/. (Last accessed: 12 May 2018).
  19. Instagram Blog. (2017, December 5). Introducing Stories Highlights and Stories Archive. Retrieved from https://instagram-press.com/blog/2017/12/05/introducing-stories-highlights-and-stories-archive/. (Last accessed: 12 May 2018).
  20. Instagram. (2016, October 29). Our Story. Retrieved from https://instagram-press.com/our-story/. (Last accessed: 12 May 2018).
  21. Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business horizons, 53(1), 59-68.
  22. Kara, T. (2017). Gençler Neden Snapchat Kullanıyor Kullanımlar ve Doyumlar Yaklaşımı Üzerinden Bir Araştırma. Intermedia International Peer-Reviewed E-Journal Of Communication Sciences, 3(5), 262-277.
  23. Khan, M. L. (2017). Social media engagement: What motivates user participation and consumption on YouTube?. Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 236-247.
  24. Kılıç, H. Ö. (2018, April). Firmaların Marka İletişiminde Snapchat Kullanımı. In Proceedings of 4 th SCF International Conference on “Economics and Social Impacts of Globalization” and “Future Turkey-European Union Relations”.
  25. Kietzmann, J. H., Hermkens, K., McCarthy, I. P., & Silvestre, B. S. (2011). Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business horizons, 54(3), 241–251.
  26. Killian, G., & McManus, K. (2015). A marketing communications approach for the digital era: Managerial guidelines for social media integration. Business Horizons, 58(5), 539–549.
  27. Kırcova, İ. & Enginkaya, E. (2015). Sosyal Medya Pazarlama. İstanbul: Beta
  28. Kofoed, J., & Larsen, M. C. (2016). A snap of intimacy: Photo-sharing practices among young people on social media. First Monday, 21(11).
  29. Kotfila, C. (2014). This message will self‐destruct: The growing role of obscurity and self‐destructing data in digital communication. Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 40(2), 12-16.
  30. Lee, E., Lee, J. A., Moon, J. H., & Sung, Y. (2015). Pictures speak louder than words: Motivations for using Instagram. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(9), 552-556.
  31. Lee, Y. K., Park, J. H., Chung, N., & Blakeney, A. (2012). A unified perspective on the factors influencing usage intention toward mobile financial services. Journal of Business Research, 65(11), 1590-1599.
  32. Makki, T. W., DeCook, J. R., Kadylak, T., & Lee, O. J. (2018). The social value of snapchat: An exploration of affiliation motivation, the technology acceptance model, and relational maintenance in Snapchat use. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 34(5), 410-420.
  33. Mangold, W. G., & Faulds, D. J. (2009). Social media: The new hybrid element of the promotion mix. Business horizons, 52(4), 357–365.
  34. McRoberts, S., Ma, H., Hall, A., & Yarosh, S. (2017, May). Share First, Save Later: Performance of Self through Snapchat Stories. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 6902-6911). ACM.
  35. Mondal, M., Messias, J., Ghosh, S., Gummadi, K. P., & Kate, A. (2016). Forgetting in social media: Understanding and controlling longitudinal exposure of socially shared data. In Twelfth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS)., 287-299.
  36. Morlok, T., Schneider, K., Matt, C., & Hess, T. (2017). Snap. Share.(Don’t) Care? Ephemerality, Privacy Concerns, and the Use of Ephemeral Social Network Sites., 1-10.
  37. Muyingo, R. I. (2017). Usage and Gratification of Social Media in Higher Education: A Survey on the Perceptions of International Students in Turkey. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 7(3), 159-181.
  38. Shao, G. (2009). Understanding the appeal of user-generated media: a uses and gratification perspective. Internet Research, 19(1), 7–25.
  39. Teo, T. (2013). An initial development and validation of a digital natives assessment scale (DNAS). Computers & Education, 67, 51-57.
  40. Tropp, J., & Baetzgen, A. (2019). Users’ Definition of Snapchat Usage. Implications for Marketing on Snapchat. International Journal on Media Management, 21(2), 130-156.
  41. Ulas, S., & Vural, Z. B. (2019). Social Media Usage Practices of Luxury Brands: A Case of Luxury Automobile Brands’ Corporate Social Media Applications. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 9(1), 1-16.
  42. Utz, S., Muscanell, N., & Khalid, C. (2015). Snapchat elicits more jealousy than Facebook: A comparison of Snapchat and Facebook use. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(3), 141–146.
  43. Van Dijck, J. (2008). Digital photography: communication, identity, memory. Visual Communication, 7(1), 57-76.
  44. van Nimwegen, C., & Bergman, K. (2019). Effects on cognition of the burn after reading principle in ephemeral media applications. Behaviour & Information Technology, 38(10), 1060-1067.
  45. Vázquez-Herrero, J., Direito-Rebollal, S., & López-García, X. (2019). Ephemeral Journalism: News Distribution Through Instagram Stories. Social Media+ Society, 5(4), 1-13.
  46. Verstraete, G. (2016). It’s about Time. Disappearing Images and Stories in Snapchat. Image & Narrative, 17(4), 104-113.
  47. Wakefield, L. T., & Bennett, G. (2018). Sports fan experience: Electronic word-of-mouth in ephemeral social media. Sport Management Review, 21(2), 147–159.
  48. Wakefield, L. T., & Wakefield, R. L. (2018). Anxiety and Ephemeral Social Media Use in Negative eWOM Creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 41, 44–59. doi: 10.1016/j.intmar.2017.09.005
  49. We are social. (2018, January 30). Digital in 2018: World’s internet users pass the 4 billion mark. Retrieved from https://wearesocial.com/blog/2018/01/global-digital-report-2018.
  50. Yoon, N., & Choo, H. J. (2011). The effects of mobile using benefits and costs on the self-connection with mobile device: Comparing between mobile fashion application users and non-users. Journal of Consumer Studies, 22(2), 227-252.