Cilt 13 Sayı 4 (2025): Business & Management Studies: An International Journal
Makaleler

OECD ülkelerinde yeşil büyüme, yönetişim ve yeşil teknoloji inovasyonunun sürdürülebilir kalkınma hedeflerine etkisi: Bir CS-ARDL analizi

PDF
  • Okan Kekül
Okan Kekül
Dr. Öğr. Üyesi, Gümüşhane Üniversitesi, Gümüşhane, Türkiye

Yayınlanmış 25.12.2025

Anahtar Kelimeler

  • Sustainability, Green Growth, Governance, Green Technology, Panel Data Analysis
  • Sürdürülebilirlik, Yeşil Büyüme, Yönetişim, Yeşil Teknoloji, Panel veri Analizi

Nasıl Atıf Yapılır

OECD ülkelerinde yeşil büyüme, yönetişim ve yeşil teknoloji inovasyonunun sürdürülebilir kalkınma hedeflerine etkisi: Bir CS-ARDL analizi. (2025). Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 13(4), 2213-2233. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v13i4.2652

Telif Hakkı (c) 2025 Okan Kekül

Creative Commons License

Bu çalışma Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License ile lisanslanmıştır.

Nasıl Atıf Yapılır

OECD ülkelerinde yeşil büyüme, yönetişim ve yeşil teknoloji inovasyonunun sürdürülebilir kalkınma hedeflerine etkisi: Bir CS-ARDL analizi. (2025). Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 13(4), 2213-2233. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v13i4.2652

Öz

Küresel çapta sürdürülebilir bir yapının oluşturulması, ekonomik göstergelerin ötesine geçmekte ve yeşil kavramının etkin bir şekilde kullanılmasını zorunlu hale getirmektedir. Bu kapsamda hem gelişmiş hem de gelişmekte olan ülkeleri bünyesinde barındıran OECD ülkelerinin yeşil dönüşüm performansları analiz edilerek, mevcut durumlarının ortaya çıkartılması kritik bir öneme sahiptir. Bu çalışmada OECD ülkelerinde yeşil büyümenin, yönetişimin ve yeşil teknoloji inovasyonunun, çevresel ve sosyal bağlamda belirlenen sürdürülebilir kalkınma hedeflerine etkisinin belirlenmesi hedeflenmiştir. CS-ARDL yönteminin kullanıldığı bu çalışmada analize ait varsayımlar dikkate alınarak; yatay kesit bağımlılığı testi sonrasında ise birim kök testleri, heterojenlik analizi ve eşbütünleşme testleri gerçekleştirilmiştir. Analiz sonuçları, CS-ARDL yöntemi için gerekli koşulları sağlaması üzerine belirlenen modeller için kısa ve uzun vadeli sonuçlar elde edilmiştir. Sonuçlar incelendiğinde, sürdürülebilirliğin çevresel boyutunda, yeşil büyümenin karbon emisyonlarını kısa vadede azalttığı fakat uzun vadede anlamlı bir etkisinin olmadığı belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca yeşil teknolojinin kısa vadede karbon emisyonlarını arttırdığı tespit edilmiştir. Sürdürülebilirliğin sosyal boyutuna ait elde edilen bulgular incelendiğinde ise ekonomik büyümenin, kısa ve uzun dönemde belirli bir yılda istihdam edilen toplam işgücünü pozitif yönde etkilediği gözlemlenmiş diğer değişkenlerin istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir etkisinin bulunmadığı gerçekleştirilen analiz sonuçlarında ortaya konulmuştur. Bu çalışmada kullanılan değişkenler ile OECD kapsamında literatürde herhangi bir çalışmaya rastlanmamıştır. Bu bağlamda CS-ARDL yöntemi ile gerçekleştirilen bu çalışmanın literatüre önemli katkılar sunması beklenmektedir. 

PDF

Referanslar

  1. Adamowicz, M. (2022). Green deal, green growth and green economy as a means of support for attaining the sustainable development goals. Sustainability, 14(10), 5901.
  2. Ahmed, A., & Anifowose, M. (2024). Corruption, corporate governance, and sustainable development goals in Africa. Corporate governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 24(1), 119–138. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-05-2022-0187
  3. Amin, A., Peng, S., Magazzino, C., Sharif, A., & Kamran, H. W. (2025). Driving sustainable development: The impact of energy transition, eco-innovation, mineral resources, and green growth on carbon emissions. Renewable Energy, 238, 121879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2025.121879
  4. Anas, M., Zhang, W., Bakhsh, S., Ali, L., Işık, C., Han, J., … & Huang, M. (2024). Moving towards sustainable environment development in emerging economies: The role of green finance, green tech‐innovation, natural resource depletion, and forested area in assessing the load capacity factor. Sustainable Development, 32(4), 3004–3020. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2774
  5. Antal, M., & Van Den Bergh, J. C. (2016). Green growth and climate change: conceptual and empirical considerations. Climate Policy, 16(2), 165-177.
  6. Aydin, M., Degirmenci, T., Bozatli, O., Radulescu, M., & Balsalobre-Lorente, D. (2025). Do green energy, command and control-based environmental regulations, and green growth act as catalysts for sustainable development? New evidence from China. Journal of Environmental Management, 373, 123620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123620
  7. Bai, J., & Carrion-i-Silvestre, J. L. (2009). Structural changes, common stochastic trends, and unit roots in panel data. The Review of Economic Studies, 76(2), 471–501. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-937X.2009.00531.x
  8. Bakkal, S. (2025). OECD ülkelerinde ekonomik büyüme, sermaye, enerji verimliliği, yeşil büyüme ve ekolojik ayak izi ilişkisi. Sosyal Bilimler Metinleri, 2025(2), 148-159.
  9. Baniya, B., Giurco, D., & Kelly, S. (2021). Green growth in Nepal and Bangladesh: Empirical analysis and future prospects. Energy Policy, 149, 112049.
  10. Barbier, E. B., & Burgess, J. C. (2021). Institutional quality, governance and progress towards the SDGs. Sustainability, 13(21), 11798.
  11. Behera, P., Behera, B., & Sethi, N. (2024). Assessing the impact of fiscal decentralisation, green finance and green technology innovation on renewable energy use in European Union countries: What is the moderating role of political risk? Renewable Energy, 229, 120715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.120715
  12. Boamah, K. B., Du, J., Boamah, P. O., Dabuo, F., Atingabili, S., Wong, S. F., & King, S. A. (2025). Assessing green innovation and development indicators for carbon emission reduction: Insights from BRICS+ economies. Environmental Challenges, 101336.
  13. Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1980). The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 239–253. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297111
  14. Cetin, M., Sümerli Sarıgül, S., & Danish. (2025). The green growth-CO2 emissions link in G7 countries: the role of energy productivity. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 22(7), 6095-6108.
  15. Chien, F., Ananzeh, M., Mirza, F., Bakar, A., Vu, H. M., & Ngo, T. Q. (2021). The effects of green growth, environmental-related tax, and eco-innovation towards carbon neutrality target in the US economy. Journal of environmental management, 299, 113633.
  16. Chudik, A. and Pesaran, M. H. (2015). Common correlated effects estimation of heterogeneous dynamic panel data models with weakly exogenous regressors. Journal of Econometrics, 188(2), 393-420.
  17. Costantini, V., & Monni, S. (2008). Environment, human development and economic growth. Ecological economics, 64(4), 867-880.
  18. Dam, M. M., Durmaz, A., Bekun, F. V., & Tiwari, A. K. (2024). The role of green growth and institutional quality on environmental sustainability: A comparison of CO₂ emissions, ecological footprint and inverted load capacity factor for OECD countries. Journal of Environmental Management, 365, 121551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.121551
  19. Dhaoui, I. (2019). Good governance for sustainable development. MPRA Paper No. 92544. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/92544
  20. Dogan, E., Hodžić, S., & Fatur Šikić, T. (2022). A way forward in reducing carbon emissions in environmentally friendly countries: the role of green growth and environmental taxes. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 35(1), 5879-5894.
  21. Dresner, S. (2008). The principles of sustainability (2nd ed.). Earthscan.
  22. Dong, K., Wang, B., Zhao, J., & Taghizadeh-Hesary, F. (2022). Mitigating carbon emissions by accelerating green growth in China. Economic Analysis and Policy, 75, 226-243.
  23. Esmaeilpour Moghadam, H., & Karami, A. (2024). Green innovation: exploring the impact of environmental patents on the adoption and advancement of renewable energy. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 35(8), 1815-1835.
  24. Eid, A. G., Mrabet, Z., & Alsamara, M. (2024). Assessing the impact of energy R&D on green growth in OECD countries: A CS-ARDL analysis. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-024-00410-7
  25. Glass, L. M., & Newig, J. (2019). Governance for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals: How important are participation, policy coherence, reflexivity, adaptation and democratic institutions? Earth System Governance, 2, 100031.
  26. Güney, T. (2015). Yönetişim ve sürdürülebilir kalkınma: OECD ülkeleri üzerine bir panel veri analizi. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 29(2), 349-363.
  27. Güney, T. (2017). Governance and sustainable development: How effective is governance? The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 26(3), 316-335.
  28. Hák, T., Janoušková, S., & Moldan, B. (2016). Sustainable development goals: A need for relevant indicators. Ecological Indicators, 60, 565–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.08.003
  29. Hao, L. N., Umar, M., Khan, Z., & Ali, W. (2021). Green growth and low carbon emission in G7 countries: How critical the network of environmental taxes, renewable energy and human capital is? Science of the Total Environment, 752, 141853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141853
  30. Hassan, A., Yang, J., Usman, A., Bilal, A., & Ullah, S. (2023). Green growth as a determinant of ecological footprint: do ICT diffusion, environmental innovation, and natural resources matter?. PLoS One, 18(9), e0287715.
  31. Hickel, J., & Kallis, G. (2020). Is green growth possible? New Political Economy, 25(4), 469-486.
  32. ILO. (2015). Yeşil ekonomide insana yakışır işler: Türkiye’den iyi örnekler vaka çalışması. ILO Office for Turkey.
  33. Işık, S. (2025). Sürdürülebilir kalkınma ile yeşil büyüme ilişkisi: Seçilmiş AB ülkeleri özelinde ampirik bir analiz. Verimlilik Dergisi, 59(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.51551/verimlilik.1555668
  34. Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2011). The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and analytical issues1. Hague journal on the rule of law, 3(2), 220-246.
  35. Kardos, M. (2012). The reflection of good governance in sustainable development strategies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 58, 1166–1173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.1095
  36. Kasztelan, A. (2017). Green growth, green economy and sustainable development: terminological and relational discourse. Prague Economic Papers, 26(4), 487-499.
  37. Khan, K. A., Ahmad, W., Zubair, A. O., Subhan, M., & Shah, M. I. (2025). From invention to progress: Energy technology innovation and sustainable development in OECD economies. Plos one, 20(2), e0310104.
  38. Knox, C., & Orazgaliyev, S. (2024). Sustainable development goals and good governance nexus: Implementation challenges in central Asia. Public Administration and Development, 44(4), 237-251.
  39. Konu, A. (2025). Sürdürülebilir kalkınma ve yönetişim dinamikleri: Ampirik bir inceleme. Journal of Economics and Research, 6(2), 21-30. https://doi.org/10.53280/jer.1690200
  40. Lafferty, W. M. (2004). From environmental protection to sustainable development: The challenge of decoupling through sectoral integration. Governance for Sustainable Development. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 191-220.
  41. Lange, P., Driessen, P. P., Sauer, A., Bornemann, B., & Burger, P. (2013). Governing towards sustainability—conceptualising modes of governance. Journal of Environmental policy & planning, 15(3), 403-425.
  42. Leal Filho, W., Platje, J., Gerstlberger, W., Ciegis, R., Kääriä, J., Klavins, M., & Kliucininkas, L. (2016). The role of governance in realising the transition towards sustainable societies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 113, 755-766.
  43. Massuga, F., Larson, M. A., Kuhl, M. R., & Doliveira, S. L. D. (2024). The influence of global governance on the sustainable performance of countries. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(11), 28567-28589.
  44. McGee, R. W., & Preobragenskaya, G. G. (2006). Corporate governance in transition economies: The theory and practice of corporate governance in Eastern Europe. In Corporate governance in transition economies (pp. 239–274). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-25715-5_12
  45. Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. W. III. (1972). The limits to growth. Universe Books.
  46. Meadowcroft, J. (2007). Who is in charge here? Governance for sustainable development in a complex world. In Governance for sustainable development (pp. 107-122). Routledge.
  47. Mentes, M. (2023). Sustainable development economy and the development of green economy in the European Union. Energy, Sustainability & Society, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-023-00446-8
  48. Nauman, M., Naheed, R., & Khan, J. (2024). Navigating sustainable horizons: Exploring the dynamics of financial stability, green growth, renewable energy, technological innovation, financial inclusion, and soft infrastructure in shaping sustainable development. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 31(20), 29939–29956. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-27673-0
  49. Obobisa, E. S., & Ahakwa, I. (2024). Stimulating the adoption of green technology innovation, clean energy resources, green finance, and environmental taxes: The way to achieve net zero CO₂ emissions in Europe? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 205, 123489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123489
  50. Okunade, S. O., Alimi, A. S., & Olayiwola, A. S. (2022). Do human capital development and globalisation matter for productivity growth? New evidence from Africa. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 6(1), 100291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2022.100291
  51. Omri, A., & Mabrouk, N. B. (2020). Good governance for sustainable development goals: Getting ahead of the pack or falling behind? Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 83, 106388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106388
  52. Omer, A. M. (2008). Energy, environment and sustainable development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 12(9), 2265–2300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2007.05.001
  53. Oyebanji, M. O., Castanho, R. A., Genc, S. Y., & Kirikkaleli, D. (2022). Patents on environmental technologies and environmental sustainability in Spain. Sustainability, 14(11), 6670. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116670
  54. Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics, No. 0435. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.572504
  55. Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross‐section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265-312.
  56. Pesaran, M. H., & Yamagata, T. (2008). Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. Journal of Econometrics, 142(1), 50–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.010
  57. Sakilu, O. B., & Chen, H. (2024). Realising carbon neutrality in top-emitter countries: Do green technology innovation, renewable energy, financial development, and environmental tax matters? Sustainability, 17(1), 37.
  58. Sethi, L., Pata, U. K., Behera, B., Sahoo, M., & Sethi, N. (2025). Sustainable future orientation for BRICS+ nations: Green growth, political stability, renewable energy and technology for ecological footprint mitigation. Renewable Energy, 244, 122701.
  59. Sethi, L., Behera, B., & Sethi, N. (2023). Do green finance, green technology innovation, and institutional quality help achieve environmental sustainability? Evidence from the developing economies. Sustainable Development, 32(3), 2709–2723. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2760
  60. Smulders, S., Toman, M., & Withagen, C. (2014). Growth theory and 'green growth'. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 30(3), 423–446. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/gru027
  61. Stojanović, I., Ateljević, J., & Stević, R. S. (2016). Good governance as a tool of sustainable development. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 5(4), 558–558. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2016.v5n4p558
  62. Swamy, P. A. V. B. (1970). Efficient inference in a random coefficient regression model. Econometrica, 38(2), 311–323. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913012
  63. Şaylan, G. (2000). Kamu yönetimi disiplininde bunalım ve yeni açılımlar üzerine düşünceler. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 33(2), 1–22.
  64. Tiwari, S., & Sharif, A. (2025). Disruptive solutions for carbon neutrality and sustainable development: Evidence from CS‐ARDL approach. Sustainable Development. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2833
  65. United Nations. (1992). Agenda 21: Programme of action for sustainable development. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/outcomedocuments/agenda21
  66. van Zeijl‐Rozema, A., Cörvers, R., Kemp, R., & Martens, P. (2008). Governance for sustainable development: a framework. Sustainable Development, 16(6), 410-421.
  67. Westerlund, J., & Hosseinkouchack, M. (2016). Modified CADF and CIPS panel unit root statistics with standard chi‐squared and normal limiting distributions. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 78(3), 347-364.
  68. Westerlund, J., & Edgerton, D. L. (2008). A simple test for cointegration in dependent panels with structural breaks. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 70(5), 665–704. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2008.00513.x
  69. World Bank. (1992). Governance and development. World Bank. Erişim adresi: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/604951468739447676
  70. Xing, H., Danish, & Tolgay, S. B. (2025). Sustainable Development in OECD Countries: Articulating the Role of Natural Resources and Green Technological Innovation. Sustainable Development.
  71. Xu, R., Chen, X., & Zhang, F. (2019). Green technology innovation and sustainable development based on data fusion mining. Ekoloji Dergisi, (107), 425–433.
  72. Yikun, Z., Leong, L. W., Abu-Rumman, A., Shraah, A. A., & Hishan, S. S. (2023). Green growth, governance, and green technology innovation: How effective towards SDGs in G7 countries? Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 36(2), 576–596. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2127813
  73. Yang, H., Shahzadi, I., & Hussain, M. (2021). USA carbon neutrality target: Evaluating the role of environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity growth in limiting carbon emissions. Journal Of Environmental Management, 298, 113385.
  74. Young, A. O. (2018). Impact of labour force dynamics on economic growth in Nigeria: An empirical analysis using ARDL Bound testing approach. Journal of Resources Development and Management, 42(1), 31–46.
  75. Zahra, S., Selvanathan, E. A., Gupta, R., & Jayasinghe, M. S. (2025). Green growth transition and carbon neutrality nexus: A comparative study on the top carbon emitters. Journal of Environmental Management, 375, 124228.
  76. Zeigermann, U. (2023). Sustainable development. In Sustainable development (pp. 279–289). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800886872.00035
  77. Zhang, H., Dogan, E., Khan, Z., & Binsaeed, R. H. (2024). Do digitalisation and green innovation limit carbon emissions? Evidences from BRICS economies. Energy & Environment, 0958305X241289537.
  78. Zhao, J., Taghizadeh-Hesary, F., Dong, K., & Dong, X. (2023). How green growth affects carbon emissions in China: the role of green finance. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 36(1), 2090-2111.
  79. Zhou, D., Obobisa, E. S., & Ayamba, E. C. (2024). Achieving carbon neutrality goal in European countries: the role of green technology innovation, renewable energy, and financial development. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1-31.