Cilt 10 Sayı 4 (2022): Business & Management Studies: An International Journal
Makaleler

Analitik hiyerarşi süreci ile ergonomi-sürdürülebilirlik projelerinin maliyet-fayda analizi

PDF (English)
  • Hüseyin YENER
Hüseyin YENER
Dr. Öğretim Üyesi, Maltepe Üniversitesi, İstanbul, Türkiye
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v10i4.2115

Yayınlanmış 2022-12-25

Anahtar Kelimeler

  • Cost-Benefit Analysis, Analytic Hierarchy Process, Project Evaluation
  • Fayda-Maliyet Analizi, Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci, Proje Değerlendirme

Nasıl Atıf Yapılır

YENER, H. (2022). Analitik hiyerarşi süreci ile ergonomi-sürdürülebilirlik projelerinin maliyet-fayda analizi. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 10(4), 1218–1227. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v10i4.2115

Telif Hakkı (c) 2022 Hüseyin YENER

Creative Commons License

Bu çalışma Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License ile lisanslanmıştır.

Özet

Günümüzde, doğal kaynakların ve düzenlemelerin yetersizliği nedeniyle sürdürülebilirlik gündemin en üst sıralarında yer almaktadır. Yöneticiler, üretkenliği korurken çevreye nasıl daha az zarar verebileceğimi sorguluyorlar. Ergonominin, bütün sistem performansını ve insan memnuniyetini optimize etmek için insan ve sistemin öğeleri arasındaki ilişkileri uyumlaştırmaya çalışan bir cevabı vardır. Ergonomi ve sürdürülebilirliğin, insanı merkeze alma konusunda ortak ilgi alanlarına sahiptir. Yöneticiler her zaman üretkenliği artırmanın yollarını arar, ancak çalışanların iyiliğine yatırım yapmayı genellikle göz ardı ederler. Projede tasarruf kanıtlanana kadar ergonomi ve çevre gibi projeleri finanse etmekte tereddüt ederler. Maliyet-Fayda Analizi (MFA) ve Analitik Hiyerarşi Sürecinin (AHS) birlikte kullanıldığı bu çalışmada önerilen model, karar vericileri, başta tamamen ilave harcama olarak görülen ergonomi veya çevre projelerini kolayca onaylamaya ikna edebilir.

PDF (English)

İndirmeler

İndirme verileri henüz mevcut değil.

Referanslar

  1. Aksoy, Ç. (2013). Scale Recommendations and Implementation of Sustainability in Business in Turkey to Evaluate Performance, (Ph. D. Thesis). Istanbul, Marmara University Social Sciences Institute, https://katalog.marmara.edu.tr/eyayin/tez/eTez023847.pdf.
  2. Darnall R. & Preston M.J., (2012). Project management: from simple to complex, v. 1.1. Flatworld Knowledge Publishing. ISBN-13: 978-1453352441.
  3. David R., Ngulube P., & Dube A. (2013). A cost-benefit analysis of document management strategies used at a financial institution in Zimbabwe: A case study, South-African Journal of Information Management, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v15i2.540.
  4. Frechtling, J. (2002). The 2002 User-Friendly Handbook for Project Evaluation. Division of Research, Evaluation and Communication National Science Foundation. https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2002/nsf02057/nsf02057.pdf
  5. Johnston, P., Everard, M., Santillo, D., & Robèrt, K. H. (2007). Reclaiming the definition of sustainability. Environmental science and pollution research international, 14(1), 60–66. https://doi.org/10.1065/espr2007.01.375
  6. Haslam, R., & Waterson, P. (2013). Ergonomics and Sustainability. Ergonomics, 56(3), 343-347, https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2013.786555.
  7. Hendrick, H.W. (2003). Determining the cost-benefits of ergonomics projects and factors that lead to their success, Applied Ergonomics, 34, 419-427, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-6870(03)00062-0.
  8. Hendrick, H.W. (1997). Good ergonomics is good economics, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica. https://www.hfes.org/Portals/0/Documents/Hendrick.pdf
  9. IEA., International Ergonomics Association. (2020). Human Factors/Ergonomics (HF/E). https://iea.cc/what-is-ergonomics/.
  10. Jayawickrama, H.M.M.M., Kulatunga, A.K., & Mathavan, S. (2016). Fuzzy AHP based Plant Sustainability Evaluation Method, 14th Global Conference on Sustainable Manufacturing, GCSM 3-5 October 2016, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
  11. Goggins, R. W., Spielholz, P., & Nothstein, G. L. (2008). Estimating the effectiveness of ergonomics interventions through case studies: implications for predictive cost-benefit analysis. Journal of safety research, 39(3), 339–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2007.12.006
  12. Mani.V., Rajat A., & Vinay S. (2014). Supplier selection using social sustainability: AHP based approach in India, International Strategic Management Review 2, 98–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ism.2014.10.003
  13. Mommoh, J. (2018). Energy processing and smart grid, Wiley-IEEE Press, 978-1-119-37623-1 (ISBN), 386.
  14. Mu, E. & Pereyra-Rojas, M. (2016). Practical decision making an introduction to the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) using super Decisions v2, SpringerBriefs in Operations Research., 7-8., 2016.
  15. Pavlovic-Veselinovic, S. (2014). Ergonomics as a missing part of sustainability. Work, 49(3), 395–399. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-141875
  16. Saaty, T. & Luis G. V. (2012). Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, SpringerBriefs in Operations Research, Volume 175, 2. Edition, ISBN 978-1-4614-3596-9.
  17. Saaty, T & Luis, G. V. (2001). The Seven Pillars of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. In: Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 34. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1665-1_2.
  18. Saaty, T. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York., 1980.
  19. Soderqvist, T., Brinkhoff, P., Norberg, T., Rosen, L., Back, P., & Norrman, J. (2015), Cost-benefit analysis as a part of sustainability assessment of remediation alternatives for contaminated lands, Journal of Environmental Management, 157, 267-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.04.024
  20. Taha, Z., Abdul Salaam, H., Sin Ye, P., Tuan Ya, T. M. Y. S., & Mohamad, M. R. (2014). Application of Integrated Sustainability Assessment: Case Study of a Screw Design, International Journal of Industrial Engineering, 22(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.23055/ijietap.2015.22.1.1224
  21. Waris, M., Panigrahi, S., Mengal, A., Soomro, M.I., Mirjat, N.H., Ullah, M., Azlan, Z.S., & Khan, A. (2019). An Application of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for Sustainable Procurement of Construction Equipment: Multicriteria-Based Decision Framework for Malaysia, Hindawi Mathematical Problems in Engineering Volume, Article ID 6391431, 20 pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6391431
  22. Zavitz, B. (2019). Demystifying cost justification for ergonomics solutions, Institute of industrial and system engineers, https://www.iise.org/details.aspx?id=45628.