Yayınlanmış 2017-04-21
Anahtar Kelimeler
- Veri Zarflama Analizi,
- AB Ülkeleri,
- Ar-Ge Etkinliği
Nasıl Atıf Yapılır
Özet
Ülkelerin Araştırma ve Geliştirme (Ar-Ge) faaliyetleri gelişmekte olan pazarda rekabet edebilmek adına büyük önem taşımaktadır. Bu önem yaygın olarak kabul edilmesine rağmen, Ar-Ge faaliyetlerinin etkinliği literatürde nadir olarak incelenmiştir. Bu nedenle, bu çalışma Avrupa Birliği (AB) üyesi ülkelerin Ar-Ge verimliliğini incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Çalışma kapsamında, ülkeler arasındaki rekabetin çok yüksek olduğu AB ülkeleri seçilmiştir, ayrıca bu ülkeler Ar-Ge faaliyetlerine ciddi miktarda kaynak ayırmaktadırlar. Veri Zarflama Analizi (VZA) göreceli etkinlik skorlarını ölçmek için kullanılmıştır. Sonrasında, AB ülkelerinin siyasi ve düzenleyici ortamının Ar-Ge verimliliği üzerindeki etkisi hipotez testleri ile analiz edilmiştir. Göreceli etkinlik skorları ve hipotez testlerinin sonuçları, sosyal politika düzenleyiciler için Ar-Ge faaliyetlerinin planlanması konusunda karar vermede değerli bilgiler vermektedir. Çalışmanın sonuçları ayrıca Türkiye gibi, AB’ye katılmak isteyen ülkelere fayda sağlayacaktır.
İndirmeler
Referanslar
- Agutter, A.J. (1995). The Linguistic Significance of Current British Slang. (Published doctoral dissertation) Edinburgh Univesity, United Kingdom.
- Alp, İ. & Sözen, A. (2014). Turkey's Performance of Energy Consumption: A Study Making a Comparison with the EU Member States. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 9(1), 87-100. doi:10.1080/15567241003773218
- Altıntaş, H. & Mercan, M. (2015). The Relationship between Research and Development (R&D) Expenditures: Panel Cointegration Analysis Under Cross Sectional Dependency on OECD Countries. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 70(2), 345-376.
- Aristovnik, A. (2012). The Relative Efficiency of Education and R&D Expenditures in the New EU Member States. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 13(5), 832-848. doi:10.3846/16111699.2011.620167
- Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429-444. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
- Cook, W. D., Cooper, W. W.,M Seiford, L. M., & Tone, K. (2001). Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-solver Software. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- Cullmann, A., Schmidt-ehmcke, J., & ZloczystI, P. (2009). Innovation, R&D Efficiency and the Impact of the Regulatory Environment: A Two-stage Semi-parametric DEA Approach. DIW Berlin Discussion Paper, No: 883.
- Doyle, J. & Green, R. (1994). Efficiency and Cross-efficiency in DEA: Derivations, Meanings and Uses. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 45(5), 567-578. doi: 10.2307/2584392
- Dutta, S. & Lanvin, B. (2013), The Global Innovation Index 2013.
- EPO (2016). Retrived from https://www.epo.org/index.html
- Eurostat (2016). Retrived from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat
- Farrell, M.J. (1957). The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A,120, 253-290.doi: 10.2307/2343100
- Garcia-valderrama, T., Mulero-mendigorri, E., & Revuelta-bordoy, D. (2009). Relating the Perspectives of the Balanced Scorecard for R&D by Means of DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 196(3), 1177-1189. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.015
- Güngör, K. (2016). Compliance Of Candidate Countries’ Fiscal Performances To European Union Membership Criteria In Global Crisis Process/Küresel Ekonomik Kriz Sürecinde Aday Ülkelerin Mali Performanslarinin Avrupa Birliği’ne Üyelik Kriterlerine Uyumu. Business And Management Studies: An International Journal, 4(3), 273-290.
- Han, U., Asmild, M., & Kunc, M. (2014). Regional R&D Efficiency in Korea from Static and Dynamic Perspectives. Regional Studies, 1-15. doi:10.1080/00343404.2014.984670
- Holland, M. Guide to citing Internet sources (2004, November 4). Retrived from http://www.bournemouth.ac.uk/library/using/guide_to_citing_internet_sourc.html.
- Hu, J. L., Yang, C. H., & Chen, C. P. (2014). R&D Efficiency and the National Innovation System: An International Comparison Using the Distance Function Approach. Bulletin of Economic Research, 66(1), 55-71.doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8586.2011.00417.x
- Lee, H. Y. & Park, Y. T. (2005). An International Comparison of R&D Efficiency: DEA Approach. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation. 13(2), 207-222. doi: 10.1080/19761597.2005.9668614
- Lee, H., Park, Y. & Choi, H. (2009). Comparative Evaluation of Performance of National R&D Programs with Heterogeneous Objectives: A DEA Approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 196(3), 847-855. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2008.06.016
- Lee, K. & Yoon, B. (2015). The Idiosyncrasy of Research and Development Efficiency Across Types of Small‐and medium‐sized Enterprises: Evidence from Korea. R&D Management, 45(3), 250-266. doi:10.1111/radm.12082.
- Luenberger, D.G. (1973). Introduction to Linear and Nonlinear Programming. Addison-Wesley: California.
- Roman, M. (2010). Regional Efficiency of the Knowledge Economy in the New EU Countries: The Romanian and Bulgarian Case. Romanian Journal of Regional Science, 4(1), 33-53.
- Rosen, J.B. (1961). The Gradient Projection Method for Nonlinear Programming: Part II Nonlinear Constraints. Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 9, 514-532. doi:10.1137/0109044.
- Sharma, S., & Thomas, V. (2008). Inter-country R&D efficiency analysis: An application of data envelopment analysis. Scientometrics, 76(3), 483-501.
- Sherman, H. D. & Zhu, J. (2006), Service Productivity Management: Improving Service Performance Using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). Springer Science & Business Media: Boston, MA, USA.
- Thomas, V. J., Jain, S. K. & Sharma, S. (2009). Analyzing R&D Efficiency in Asia and the OECD: An Application of the Malmquist Productivity Index. In Science and Innovation Policy, 2009 Atlanta Conference on IEEE, 1-10.
- Thomas, V., J. Sharma, S. & Jain, S. K. (2011). Using Patents and Publications to Assess R&D Efficiency in the States of the USA. World Patent Information, 33(1), 4-10.doi:10.1016/j.wpi.2010.01.005
- Ulucan,A. (2002). Data Envelopment Analysis Approach in Efficiency Measurement of IS0500 Companies: Evaluations Using Different Input Output Components and Different Returns to Scale. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 57(2), 187-202.
- USPTO. (2016). Retrived from http://www.uspto.gov
- Wang, E. C. (2007). R&D Efficiency and Economic Performance: A Cross-country Analysis Using the Stochastic Frontier Approach. Journal of Policy Modeling, 29(2), 345-360. doi:10.1016/j.jpolmod.2006.12.005.
- Wu, H. C., & Liu, S. F. (2007). Evaluaton on the R&D Relative Efficiency of Different Areas in China Based on Improved DEA Model [J]. R&D Management, 2, 108-112.
- Yıldız, A. (2006). Evaluation of Portfolio Performance with Data Envelopment. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 61(2), 211-234