Cilt 7 Sayı 4 (2019): Business & Management Studies: An International Journal
Makaleler

BULANIK ÇOK KRİTERLİ KARAR VERME ORTAMINDA YEŞİL TEDARİKÇİ SEÇİMİ

Fatma Selen MADENOĞLU
Dr. Öğr. Üyesi, Abdullah Gül Üniversitesi

Yayınlanmış 2019-09-25

Anahtar Kelimeler

  • Green Supply Chain Management, Group Decision Making, Fuzzy Multi Criteria Decision Making Methods, Green Supplier Selection
  • Yeşil Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi, Grup Karar Verme, Bulanık Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yöntemleri, Yeşil Tedarikçi Seçimi

Nasıl Atıf Yapılır

MADENOĞLU, F. S. (2019). BULANIK ÇOK KRİTERLİ KARAR VERME ORTAMINDA YEŞİL TEDARİKÇİ SEÇİMİ. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 7(4), 1850–1869. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v7i4.1155

Özet

Yasal düzenlemeler ve müşterilerin artan çevre koruma bilinci, işletmeleri tedarik zinciri faaliyetlerini, yeşil tedarikçi zinciri yönetimine uygun olarak çevreye daha az zarar verecek şekilde yapılandırmaya özen gösterir hale getirmiştir. Yeşil tedarikçi seçimi, yeşil tedarik zinciri yönetiminde rol alan önemli faktörlerdendir. Yeşil tedarikçi seçiminde ekonomik ve çevresel kriterler birlikte ele alınmaktadır. Yeşil tedarikçi seçim problemleri belirsizlik içerdiğinden karar vericilerin dilsel ifadelerle görüşlerini belirtebilecekleri bulanık küme teorisi kullanılmaktadır. Yeşil tedarikçi seçim probleminde, birden fazla alternatif birden fazla kritere göre değerlendirildiğinden, çok kriterli karar verme yöntemleri bu problemin çözümü için oldukça uygundur. Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, nicel verilerin yetersiz olduğu yeşil tedarikçi seçim ortamında, önerilen çözüm yöntemini kullanarak yeşil tedarikçi seçimini gerçekleştirmektir. Önerilen modelde, yeşil tedarikçi sıralaması Bulanık TOPSİS, Bulanık Vikor, Bulanık Gri İlişkisel Analiz, Bulanık Aras yöntemleri ile elde edilmiştir. Tedarikçi seçim ve değerlendirme kriter ağırlıkları bulanık SWARA yöntemiyle belirlenmiş ve bilgi kaybının olmasını önlemek için çok kriterli karar verme problemlerinde de kriter ağırlıkları bulanık sayı olarak kullanılmıştır. Önerilen çözüm modeli, orta ölçekli şehir mobilya üretimi gerçekleştiren bir işletmenin yeşil tedarikçi seçim sürecine uygulanmıştır. Bu uygulama için yapılan hesaplamalar neticesinde dört yöntemden aynı tedarikçi sıralaması elde edilmiştir. Çalışmada kullanılan dört çok kriterli karar verme yönteminin temel ve kavramsal özellikleri değerlendirilmiştir. Bu problem için gri ilişkisel analiz yönteminin daha uygun olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır.  

İndirmeler

İndirme verileri henüz mevcut değil.

Referanslar

  1. Aissaoui, N., Haouari, M., ve Hassini, E. (2007). “Supplier Selection and Order Lot Sizing Modeling: A Review”, Computers & operations research, 34(12), 3516-3540.
  2. Agarwal, P., Sahai, M., Mishra, V., Bag, M., ve Singh, V. (2011). “A Review of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Techniques for Supplier Evaluation And Selection”, International journal of industrial engineering computations, 2(4), 801-810.
  3. Ahmadi, H. B., Petrudi, S. H. H., ve Wang, X. (2017). “Integrating sustainability into supplier selection with analytical hierarchy process and improved grey relational analysis: a case of telecom industry” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 90(9-12), 2413-2427.
  4. Akman, G. (2015). “Evaluating Suppliers to Include Green Supplier Development Programs via Fuzzy C-Means And VIKOR Methods”, Computers & industrial engineering, 86, 69-82.
  5. Amin, S. H., ve Zhang, G. (2012). “An Integrated Model for Closed-Loop Supply Chain Configuration and Supplier Selection: Multi-Objective Approach”, Expert Systems with Applications, 39(8), 6782-6791.
  6. Awasthi, A., Chauhan, S. S., ve Goyal, S. K. (2010). “A Fuzzy Multicriteria Approach for Evaluating Environmental Performance of Suppliers”, International Journal of Production Economics, 126(2), 370-378.
  7. Awasthi, A., ve Kannan, G. (2016). “Green Supplier Development Program Selection using NGT and VIKOR Under Fuzzy Environment”, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 91, 100-108.
  8. Awasthi, A., Govindan, K., ve Gold, S. (2018). “Multi-Tier Sustainable Global Supplier Selection using a Fuzzy AHP-VIKOR Based Approach”, International Journal of Production Economics, 195, 106-117.
  9. Bai, C., ve Sarkis, J. (2010). “Integrating Sustainability into Supplier Selection With Grey System And Rough Set Methodologies”, International Journal of Production Economics, 124(1), 252-264.
  10. Bali, O., Kose, E., ve Gumus, S. (2013). “Green Supplier Selection Based on IFS And GRA”, Grey Systems: Theory and Application, 3(2), 158-176.
  11. Banaeian, N., Nielsen, I. E., Mobli, H., ve Omid, M. (2014). “Green Supplier Selection In Edible Oil Production by a Hybrid Model Using Delphi Method And Green Data Envelopment Analysis (GDEA)”, Management and Production Engineering Review, 5(4), 3-8.
  12. Banaeian, N., Mobli, H., Fahimnia, B., Nielsen, I. E., ve Omid, M. (2018). “Green Supplier Selection Using Fuzzy Group Decision Making Methods: A Case Study From The Agri-Food İndustry”, Computers & Operations Research, 89, 337-347.
  13. Bottani, E., Centobelli, P., Murino, T., ve Shekarian, E. (2018). “A QFD-ANP Method for Supplier Selection with Benefits, Opportunities, Costs and Risks Considerations”, International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 17(03), 911-939.
  14. Büyüközkan, G., ve Vardaloğlu, Z. (2008). “Yeşil tedarik zinciri yönetimi”, Lojistik Dergisi, 8, 66-73.
  15. Büyüközkan, G., ve Çifçi, G. (2011). “A Novel Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Framework for Sustainable Supplier Selection With Incomplete Information”, Computers in industry, 62(2), 164-174.
  16. Büyüközkan, G., ve Çifçi, G. (2012). “A Novel Hybrid MCDM Approach Based nn Fuzzy DEMATEL, Fuzzy ANP And Fuzzy TOPSIS To Evaluate Green Suppliers”, Expert Systems with Applications, 39(3), 3000-3011.
  17. Büyüközkan, G., ve Göçer, F. (2018). “An Extension Of Aras Methodology Under Interval Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Environment for Digital Supply Chain”, Applied Soft Computing, 69, 634-654.
  18. Chai, J., Liu, J. N., ve Ngai, E. W. (2013). “Application of Decision-Making Techniques in Supplier Selection: A Systematic Review of Literature”, Expert systems with applications, 40(10), 3872-3885.
  19. Chang, D. Y. (1996). “Applications of The Extent Analysis Method on Fuzzy AHP”, European journal of operational research, 95(3), 649-655.
  20. Choi, T. M. (2013). “Optimal Apparel Supplier Selection With Forecast Updates Under Carbon Emission Taxation Scheme”. Computers & Operations Research, 40(11), 2646-2655.
  21. Deng, J. L. (1989). “Introduction to Grey Sistem”. The Journal of Grey System, 1, 1-24.
  22. Dos Santos, B. M., Godoy, L. P., ve Campos, L. M. (2019). Performance evaluation of green suppliers using entropy-TOPSIS-F. Journal of Cleaner Production, 207, 498-509.
  23. Govindan, K., Rajendran, S., Sarkis, J., ve Murugesan, P. (2015). “Multi Criteria Decision Making Approaches for Green Supplier Evaluation and Selection: A Literature Review”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 98, 66-83.
  24. Govindan, K., Shankar, M., ve Kannan, D. (2018). “Supplier Selection Based on Corporate Social Responsibility Practices”, International Journal of Production Economics, 200, 353-379.
  25. Grisi, R. M., Guerra, L., ve Naviglio, G. (2010). “Supplier Performance Evaluation for Green Supply Chain Management”, In Business performance measurement and management (pp. 149-163). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
  26. Guarnieri, P., ve Trojan, F. (2019). “Decision Making On Supplier Selection Based on Social, Ethical, and Environmental Criteria: A Study In The Textile Industry”, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 141, 347-361.
  27. Hashemi, S. H., Karimi, A., ve Tavana, M. (2015). “An Integrated Green Supplier Selection Approach with Analytic Network Process and Improved Grey Relational Analysis”, International Journal of Production Economics, 159, 178-191.
  28. Ho, W., Xu, X., ve Dey, P. K. (2010). “Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approaches for Supplier Evaluation and Selection: A Literature Review”, European Journal of operational research, 202(1), 16-24.
  29. Hwang, C. L., ve Yoon, K. (1981). “Methods for Multiple Attribute Decision Making”, In Multiple attribute decision making. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
  30. Jiang, P., Hu, Y. C., Yen, G. F., ve Tsao, S. J. (2018). “Green Supplier Selection for Sustainable Development of The Automotive Industry Using Grey Decision‐Making”, Sustainable Development, 26(6), 890-903.
  31. Junior, F. R. L., Osiro, L., ve Carpinetti, L. C. R. (2014). “A comparison between Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS methods to supplier selection”, Applied Soft Computing, 21, 194-209.
  32. Keršulıene, V., Zavadskas, E. K. ve Turskıs, Z. (2010), “Selection of Rational Dispute Resolution Method by Applying New Step-Wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA)”, Journal of Business Economics and Management, 11(2), 243–258.
  33. Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Amiri, M., Zavadskas, E. K., ve Antucheviciene, J. (2017). “Supplier Evaluation and Selection In Fuzzy Environments: A Review of MADM Approaches”, Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 30(1), 1073-1118.
  34. Kuo, M. S., ve Liang, G. S. (2011). “Combining VIKOR with GRA Techniques to Evaluate Service Quality of Airports Under Fuzzy Environment”, Expert Systems with Applications, 38(3), 1304-1312.
  35. Lee, A. H., Kang, H. Y., Hsu, C. F., ve Hung, H. C. (2009). “A Green Supplier Selection Model for High-Tech Industry”, Expert systems with applications, 36(4), 7917-7927.
  36. Liao, C. N., Fu, Y. K., ve Wu, L. C. (2016). “Integrated FAHP, ARAS-F And MSGP Methods For Green Supplier Evaluation And Selection”, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 22(5), 651-669.
  37. Lin, C. L., Lin, J. L., ve Ko, T. C. (2002). “ Optimisation of the EDM process based on the orthogonal array with fuzzy logic and grey relational analysis method”, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 19(4), 271-277.
  38. Lo, H. W., Liou, J. J., Wang, H. S., ve Tsai, Y. S. (2018). “An Integrated Model For Solving Problems in Green Supplier Selection and Order Allocation”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 190, 339-352.
  39. Mavi, R. K., Goh, M., ve Zarbakhshnia, N. (2017). “Sustainable Third-Party Reverse Logistic Provider Selection With Fuzzy SWARA and Fuzzy MOORA In Plastic İndustry”, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 91(5-8), 2401-2418.
  40. Mousakhani, S., Nazari-Shirkouhi, S., ve Bozorgi-Amiri, A. (2017). “A Novel Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Evaluation Model Based Group Decision Analysis for Green Supplier Selection Problems: A Case Study Of Battery İndustry”, Journal of cleaner production, 168, 205-218.
  41. Nielsen, I. E., Banaeian, N., Golińska, P., Mobli, H., ve Omid, M. (2014). “Green Supplier Selection Criteria: From A Literature Review to a Flexible Framework For Determination of Suitable Criteria”. In Logistics operations, supply chain management and sustainability (pp. 79-99). Springer, Cham.
  42. Opricovic, S., ve Tzeng, G. H. (2004). “Compromise Solution by MCDM Methods: A Comparative Analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS”, European journal of operational research, 156(2), 445-455.
  43. Rashidi, K., ve Cullinane, K. (2019). “A Comparison of Fuzzy DEA and Fuzzy TOPSIS in Sustainable Supplier Selection: Implications For Sourcing Strategy”, Expert Systems with Applications, 121, 266-281.
  44. Roostaee, R., Izadikhah, M., Lotfi, F. H., ve Rostamy-Malkhalifeh, M. (2012). “A Multi-Criteria İntuitionistic Fuzzy Group Decision Making Method For Supplier Selection With VIKOR Method”, International Journal of Fuzzy System Applications (IJFSA), 2(1), 1-17.
  45. Sanayei, A., Mousavi, S. F., ve Yazdankhah, A. (2010). “Group Decision Making Process For Supplier Selection With VIKOR Under Fuzzy Environment”, Expert Systems with Applications, 37(1), 24-30.
  46. Sahu, A. K., Datta, S., ve Mahapatra, S. S. (2016). “Evaluation and selection of resilient suppliers in fuzzy environment: exploration of fuzzy-VIKOR”, Benchmarking: An International Journal, 23(3), 651-673.
  47. Shen, L., Olfat, L., Govindan, K., Khodaverdi, R., ve Diabat, A. (2013). “A Fuzzy Multi Criteria Approach for Evaluating Green Supplier's Performance in Green Supply Chain With Linguistic Preferences”, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 74, 170-179.
  48. Shemshadi, A., Shirazi, H., Toreihi, M., ve Tarokh, M. J. (2011). “A Fuzzy VIKOR Method For Supplier Selection Based on Entropy Measure For Objective Weighting”, Expert Systems with Applications, 38(10), 12160-12167.
  49. Shi, H., Quan, M. Y., Liu, H. C., ve Duan, C. Y. (2018). “A Novel Integrated Approach for Green Supplier Selection with Interval-Valued İntuitionistic Uncertain Linguistic İnformation: A Case Study in the Agri-Food İndustry”, Sustainability, 10(3), 733.
  50. Srivastava, S. K. (2007). “Green Supply‐Chain Management: A State‐Of‐The‐Art Literature review”, International Journal Of Management Reviews, 9(1), 53-80.
  51. Suarez-Alvarez, M. M., Pham, D. T., Prostov, M. Y., ve Prostov, Y. I. (2012). “Statistical approach to normalization of feature vectors and clustering of mixed datasets“, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 468(2145), 2630-2651.
  52. Turskis, Z., ve Zavadskas, E. K. (2010). “A New Fuzzy Additive Ratio Assessment Method (ARAS‐F). Case Study: The Analysis of Fuzzy Multiple Criteria in Order To Select The Logistic Centers Location”, Transport, 25(4), 423-432.
  53. Tuzkaya, G., Ozgen, A., Ozgen, D., ve Tuzkaya, U. R. (2009). “Environmental Performance Evaluation of Suppliers: A Hybrid Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Approach”, International Journal of Environmental Science & Technology, 6(3), 477-490.
  54. Yazdani, M., Kahraman, C., Zarate, P., ve Onar, S. C. (2019). “A Fuzzy Multi Attribute Decision Framework With İntegration of QFD And Grey Relational Analysis”, Expert Systems with Applications, 115, 474-485.
  55. Yıldız, A., ve Yayla, A. Y. (2015). “Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods for Supplier Selection: A Literature Review”, South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 26(2), 158-177.
  56. Wang Chen, H. M., Chou, S. Y., Luu, Q. D., ve Yu, T. H. K. (2016). “A Fuzzy MCDM Approach for Green Supplier Selection From The Economic and Environmental Aspects”, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2016.
  57. Wang, T. C., ve Tsai, S. Y. (2018). “Solar Panel Supplier Selection for The Photovoltaic System Design by Using Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Approaches”, Energies, 11(8), 1989.
  58. Wang, C. N., Nguyen, V. T., Thai, H. T. N., Tran, N. N., ve Tran, T. L. A. (2018). “Sustainable Supplier Selection Process in Edible Oil Production by a Hybrid Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process and Green Data Envelopment Analysis For The Smes Food Processing Industry”, Mathematics, 6(12), 302.
  59. Weber, C. A., Current, J. R., ve Benton, W. C. (1991). “Vendor Selection Criteria And Methods”, European journal of operational research, 50(1), 2-18.
  60. Zadeh, L. A. (1965). “Fuzzy sets”, Information and control, 8(3), 338-353.
  61. Zarbakhshnia, N., Soleimani, H., ve Ghaderi, H. (2018). “Sustainable Third-Party Reverse Logistics Provider Evaluation And Selection Using Fuzzy SWARA and Developed Fuzzy COPRAS In The Presence of Risk Criteria”, Applied Soft Computing, 65, 307-319.
  62. Zhao, J., You, X. Y., Liu, H. C., ve Wu, S. M. (2017). “An Extended VIKOR Method Using Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets and Combination Weights For Supplier Selection”, Symmetry, 9(9), 169.
  63. Zimmer, K., Fröhling, M., ve Schultmann, F. (2016). “Sustainable Supplier Management–A Review of Models Supporting Sustainable Supplier Selection, Monitoring and Development”, International Journal of Production Research, 54(5), 1412-1442.