Cilt 14 Sayı 3 (2026): Business & Management Studies: An International Journal
Makaleler

Dijital vizyon ve stratejinin ve dijital yönetişimin örgütsel sürdürülebilirlikle ilişkisinde beşeri dijital yetkinliğin rolü

PDF (İngilizce)
  • Adem Özdemir
Adem Özdemir
Dr. Öğr. Üyesi., Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen Üniversitesi, Ağrı, Türkiye

Yayınlanmış 25.09.2026

Anahtar Kelimeler

  • Digital Vision and Strategy, Organizational Sustainability, Digital Transformation
  • Dijital Vizyon ve Strateji, Örgütsel Sürdürülebilirlik, Dijital Dönüşüm

Nasıl Atıf Yapılır

Dijital vizyon ve stratejinin ve dijital yönetişimin örgütsel sürdürülebilirlikle ilişkisinde beşeri dijital yetkinliğin rolü. (2026). Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 14(3), 1377-1392. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v14i3.2822

Telif Hakkı (c) 2026 Adem Özdemir

Creative Commons License

Bu çalışma Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License ile lisanslanmıştır.

Nasıl Atıf Yapılır

Dijital vizyon ve stratejinin ve dijital yönetişimin örgütsel sürdürülebilirlikle ilişkisinde beşeri dijital yetkinliğin rolü. (2026). Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 14(3), 1377-1392. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v14i3.2822

Öz

Bu çalışma, dijital vizyon ve strateji (DVS) ile dijital yönetişimin (DG) örgütsel sürdürülebilirlik (OS) üzerindeki etkilerini, özellikle insan dijital yeterliliğinin (HDC) aracılık rolüne vurgu yaparak incelemektedir. Doğal kaynak temelli yaklaşım ve dinamik yetkinlikler perspektifinden yola çıkan çalışma, dijital stratejik yönelimlerin ve yönetişim mekanizmalarının, insan dijital yetkinlikleri aracılığıyla sürdürülebilirlik sonuçlarına nasıl katkıda bulunduğunu açıklayan bir çerçeve geliştirmektedir. Türkiye’de faaliyet gösteren firmalardan toplanan anket verileri (N=481), PLS-SEM yöntemi kullanılarak analiz edildi. Bulgular, DG’nin OS üzerinde olumlu bir doğrudan etkiye sahip olduğunu, buna karşın DVS’nin OS’yi doğrudan anlamlı bir şekilde etkilemediğini ortaya koymaktadır. HDC ise OS’yi olumsuz etkilemekte ve hem DVS hem de DG ile örgütsel sürdürülebilirlik arasındaki ilişkilerde aracılık rolü oynamaktadır. Bu bulgular, HDC’yi dijital vizyon, strateji ve yönetişimin sürdürülebilirlik sonuçlarına dönüştürüldüğü kilit bir mekanizma olarak konumlandırmaktadır. Bu çalışma, dijital yönetişimin sürdürülebilirlik üzerindeki doğrudan ve dolaylı etkilerini ortaya koyarak ve dijital dönüşüm ile örgütsel sürdürülebilirlik arasındaki ilişkiyi açıklamak için kaynak temelli ve dinamik yetkinlik perspektiflerini genişleterek literatüre katkı sağlamaktadır.

PDF (İngilizce)

Referanslar

  1. Aksin-Sivrikaya, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2017). Where digitalization meets sustainability: Opportunities and challenges. Sustainability in a digital world: New opportunities through new technologies, 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54603-2_3
  2. Arantes, L., & Ferreira, J. J. (2025). Innovative sustainability strategies and the role of digital transformation in organizations. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.3123
  3. Asbeetah, Z., Alzubi, A., Khadem, A., & Iyiola, K. (2025). Harnessing digital transformation for sustainable performance: Exploring the mediating roles of green knowledge acquisition and innovation performance under digital transformational leadership. Sustainability, 17(5), 2285. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17052285
  4. Aslanova, I. V., & Kulichkina, A. I. (2020). Digital maturity: Definition and model. In 2nd International Scientific and Practical Conference “Modern Management Trends and the Digital Economy: From Regional Development to Global Economic Growth” (MTDE 2020) (pp. 443–449). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200502.073
  5. Barbosa, L. S. (2017). Digital governance for sustainable development. In Digital Nations–Smart Cities, Innovation, and Sustainability: 16th IFIP WG 6.11 Conference on e-Business, e-Services, and e-Society, I3E 2017, Delhi, India, November 21–23, 2017, Proceedings 16 (pp. 85–93). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68557-1_9
  6. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
  7. Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O. A., Pavlou, P. A., & Venkatraman, N. V. (2013). Digital business strategy: Toward a next generation of insights. MIS quarterly, 37(2), 471–482. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37:2.3
  8. Charfeddine, L., & Umlai, M. (2023). ICT sector, digitization and environmental sustainability: A systematic review of the literature from 2000 to 2022. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 184, 113482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113482
  9. Cheng, Z., Jin, X., & Kwak, W. J. (2025). Using the new positive aspect of digital leadership to improve organizational sustainability: Testing moderated mediation model. Acta Psychologica, 255, 104963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104963
  10. Choi, Y., & Yu, Y. (2014). The influence of perceived corporate sustainability practices on employees and organizational performance. Sustainability, 6(1), 348–364. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6010348
  11. Clauss, T., Abebe, M., Tangpong, C., & Hock, M. (2019). Strategic agility, business model innovation, and firm performance: An empirical investigation. IEEE transactions on engineering management, 68(3), 767–784. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2019.2910381
  12. Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587
  13. Colás-Bravo, P., Conde-Jiménez, J., & Reyes-de-Cózar, S. (2021). Sustainability and digital teaching competence in higher education. Sustainability, 13(22), 12354. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212354
  14. Das, T. K., & Teng, B. S. (2000). A resource-based theory of strategic alliances. Journal of management, 26(1), 31–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600105
  15. Dijkstra, T. K., & Henseler, J. (2015). Consistent partial least squares path modeling. MIS quarterly, 39(2), 297–316. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.2.02
  16. El Hilali, W., & El Manouar, A. (2019). Unlocking digitalization's possibilities: Reaching sustainability by adopting the right digital strategy. In 2019 International Conference on Wireless Technologies, Embedded and Intelligent Systems (WITS) (pp. 1–6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/WITS.2019.8723793
  17. Eschenfelder, K. R., Shankar, K., Williams, R. D., Salo, D., Zhang, M., & Langham, A. (2019). A nine-dimensional framework for digital cultural heritage organizational sustainability: A content analysis of the LIS literature (2000–2015). Online Information Review, 43(2), 182–196. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-11-2017-0318
  18. Esses, D. (2024). People powering progress: How human resource influences your company’s digitalization and sustainable growth. Cognitive Sustainability, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.55343/CogSust.100
  19. Feroz, A. K., Zo, H., & Chiravuri, A. (2021). Digital transformation and environmental sustainability: A review and research agenda. Sustainability, 13(3), 1530. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031530
  20. Ferrari, A. (2012). Digital competence in practice: An analysis of frameworks (Vol. 10). Publications Office of the European Union.
  21. Galleli, B., Hourneaux Jr, F., & Munck, L. (2019). Sustainability and human competences: A systematic literature review. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 27(7), 1981–2004. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-12-2018-0433
  22. Gilli, K. (2023). Leadership Competencies for Digital Transformation (Doctoral dissertation, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano).
  23. Gobble, M. M. (2018). Digital strategy and digital transformation. Research-Technology Management, 61(5), 66–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2018.1495969
  24. Gregory, R. W., Keil, M., Muntermann, J., & Mähring, M. (2015). Paradoxes and the nature of ambidexterity in IT transformation programs. Information Systems Research, 26(1), 57–80. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2014.0554
  25. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7
  26. Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
  27. Helfat, C. E., Finkelstein, S., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M., Singh, H., Teece, D., & Winter, S. G. (2009). Dynamic capabilities: Understanding strategic change in organizations. John Wiley & Sons.
  28. Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P. A. (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: Updated guidelines. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(1), 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0382
  29. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modelling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
  30. Hess, T., Matt, C., Benlian, A., & Wiesböck, F. (2016). Options for formulating a digital transformation strategy. Mis quarterly executive, 15(2).
  31. Hrebiniak, L. G. (2013). Making strategy work: Leading effective execution and change. FT Press.
  32. Huang, C., Liu, W., Iqbal, W., & Shah, S. A. R. (2024). Does digital governance matter for environmental sustainability? The key challenges and opportunities under the prism of natural resource management. Resources Policy, 91, 104812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104812
  33. Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2012). Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Information Systems Management, 29(4), 258–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2012.716740
  34. Kampylis, P., Punie, Y., & Devine, J. (2015). Promoting effective digital-age learning-A European framework for digitally competent educational organizations (No. JRC98209). Joint Research Centre.
  35. Kane, G. C., Palmer, D., Nguyen-Phillips, A., Kiron, D., & Buckley, N. (2017). Achieving digital maturity. MIT sloan management review, 59(1).
  36. Kane, G. C., Palmer, D., Phillips, A. N., Kiron, D., & Buckley, N. (2015). Strategy, not technology, drives digital transformation. MIT Sloan Management Review.
  37. Khan, S., Ullah, S., & Nobanee, H. (2024). ICT diffusion, E-governance, and sustainability in the digital era. Sustainable Futures, 8, 100272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2024.100272
  38. Kinkel, S., Baumgartner, M., & Cherubini, E. (2022). Prerequisites for the adoption of AI technologies in manufacturing–Evidence from a worldwide sample of manufacturing companies. Technovation, 110, 102375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102375
  39. Klein, M. (2020). İşletmelerde dijital dönüşüm ve etmenleri, Journal of Business in the Digital Age, 3(1), 24–35.
  40. Kuzma, E. L., Doliveira, S. L. D., & Silva, A. Q. (2017). Skills for organizational sustainability: A systematic review/Competencias para a sustentabilidade organizacional: Uma revisao sistematica/Competencias para la sostenibilidad organizacional: Una revision sistematica. Cadernos EBAPE. BR, 15(SE), 428–445. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-395160726
  41. Li, J., Zhan, G., Dai, X., Qi, M., & Liu, B. (2022). Innovation and optimization logic of grassroots digital governance in China under digital empowerment and digital sustainability. Sustainability, 14(24), 16470. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416470
  42. Li, L., & Lin, J. (2024). Digital transformation for the sustainable development of firms: The role of green capability and green culture. Sustainable Development, 32(3), 1861–1875. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2756
  43. Liang, Y., Koo, J. M., & Lee, M. J. (2024). The interplay of environmental dynamism, digitalization capability, green entrepreneurial orientation, and sustainable performance. Sustainability, 16(17), 7674. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177674
  44. Linkov, I., Trump, B. D., Poinsatte-Jones, K., & Florin, M. V. (2018). Governance strategies for a sustainable digital world. Sustainability, 10(2), 440. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020440
  45. McDonald, M. P., & Rowsell-Jones, A. (2012). The digital edge. Gartner, Incorporated.
  46. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American journal of sociology, 83(2), 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550
  47. Miceli, A., Hagen, B., Riccardi, M. P., Sotti, F., & Settembre-Blundo, D. (2021). Thriving, not just surviving in changing times: How sustainability, agility and digitalization intertwine with organizational resilience. Sustainability, 13(4), 2052. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042052
  48. Mintzberg, H. (1994). Rise and fall of strategic planning. Simon & Schuster.
  49. Niu, S., Park, B. I., & Jung, J. S. (2022). The effects of digital leadership and ESG management on organizational innovation and sustainability. Sustainability, 14(23), 15639. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315639
  50. Özdemir, A., & Tan, F. Z. (2023). The impact of digital transformation on organizational agility. Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
  51. O’brien, R. M. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & quantity, 41(5), 673–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6
  52. Parviainen, P., Tihinen, M., Kääriäinen, J., & Teppola, S. (2017). Tackling the digitalization challenge: How to benefit from digitalization in practice. International journal of information systems and project management, 5(1), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm050104
  53. Parvin, B., Shayan, A., Poorebrahimi, A., & Radfar, R. (2023). Prediction of digital governance in the direction of urban smartness with sustainability approach (Case Study: Tehran). Journal of Computer & Robotics, 29(1), 61.
  54. Porter, M. E., & Heppelmann, J. E. (2014). How smart, connected products are transforming competition. Harvard Business Review, 92(11), 64–88.
  55. Sainger, G. (2018). Leadership in digital age: A study on the role of leader in this era of digital transformation. International Journal on Leadership, 6(1), 1.
  56. Saltos-Rivas, R., Novoa-Hernandez, P., & Rodriguez, R. S. (2023). Understanding university teachers’ digital competencies: A systematic mapping study. Education and Information Technologies, 28(12), 16771–16822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11669-w
  57. Sambamurthy, V., & Zmud, R. W. (1999). Arrangements for information technology governance: A theory of multiple contingencies. MIS quarterly, 261–290. https://doi.org/10.2307/249754
  58. Schlecht, L., Schneider, S., & Buchwald, A. (2021). The prospective value creation potential of Blockchain in business models: A delphi study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 166, 120601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120601
  59. Sezen-Gültekin, G., & Argon, T. (2020). Development of organizational sustainability scale. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 10(3), 507–531. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.757529
  60. Sheninger, E. (2014). Pillars of digital leadership. International Center for Leadership in Education, 1(4), 1–4.
  61. Sousa, M. J., & Rocha, Á. (2019). Skills for disruptive digital business. Journal of Business Research, 94, 257–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.051
  62. Sudaryanto, M. R., Hendrawan, M. A., & Andrian, T. (2023). The effect of technology readiness, digital competence, perceived usefulness, and ease of use on accounting students’ artificial intelligence technology adoption. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 388, p. 04055). EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202338804055
  63. Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and micro foundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic management journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
  64. Teece, D. J. (2018). Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long range planning, 51(1), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.06.007
  65. UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report, 2023: Technology in education: A tool on whose terms? UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000385723.
  66. Van Grembergen, W., & De Haes, S. (2009). Enterprise governance of information technology: Achieving strategic alignment and value. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-84882-2_1
  67. Von Krogh, G. (2012). How does social software change knowledge management? Toward a strategic research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 21(2), 154–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2012.04.003
  68. Wang, C. L., & Ahmed, P. K. (2007). Dynamic capabilities: A review and research agenda. International journal of management reviews, 9(1), 31–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00201.x
  69. Weill, P., & Ross, J. W. (2004). IT governance: How top performers manage IT decision rights for superior results. Harvard Business Press.
  70. Westerman, G., Bonnet, D., & McAfee, A. (2014). Leading digital: Turning technology into business transformation. Harvard Business Press.
  71. Yu, J., & Moon, T. (2021). Impact of digital strategic orientation on organizational performance through digital competence. Sustainability, 13(17), 9766. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179766
  72. Zhao, X., Lynch Jr, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of consumer research, 37(2), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1086/651257
  73. Zollo, M., & Winter, S. G. (2002). Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization science, 13(3), 339–351. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.3.339.2780